On 18.10.2014 21:47, David Brodie wrote:
On 18/10/14 19:06, Andrei Banu wrote:
Hello,
I have covered the entire LFS 7.6 but upon final reboot
it is not restarting. Grub normal shell (not rescue) appears.
I have tried to restart it manually but it doesn't boot properly.
I suppose the reason
On 18.10.2014 21:53, Dan McGhee wrote:
On Oct 18, 2014, at 13:06, Andrei Banu andrei.b...@redhost.ro wrote:
So I built the no-kmods version but I get this error when I try to
boot:
The device /dev/mapper/vg_i5linux-lv_lfs which is supposed to
contain the root file system, does not exist.
+++
Le 19/10/2014 11:50, Andrei Banu a écrit :
David
Hi,
Thank you for your answer. Just to make sure (I was not 100% certain), I have
recompiled the kernel and made sure that Device Mapper Support is built-in
(not as a module). However I have the same problems:
- mkinitramfs returns the same
I am not sure: is the kernel meant to create the /dev/mapper LVM logical
volumes or it's the initrd's job?
And how can I fix the mkinitramfs errors?
The kernel creates /dev/mapper. So, with or without an initrd the devices
should be listed under /dev, providing, of course, that the kernel
On 19.10.2014 11:00, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Hi,
beginning atop just to tell that I answer inside your message.
Le 18/10/2014 20:06, Andrei Banu a écrit :
Hello,
I have covered the entire LFS 7.6 but upon final reboot
it is not restarting. Grub normal shell (not rescue) appears.
I have tried
Hi,
/dev/mapper is created but it is virtually empty (except for a char device).
I was asking what populates /dev/mapper with the LV devices.
I do have a separate /boot partition (it's /dev/sda1). And I have a second
partition /dev/sda2 of LVM type on which I have 4 LVs.
Thanks!
On 19.10.2014
On 19 October 2014 11:37, Andrei Banu andrei.b...@redhost.ro wrote:
Hi,
/dev/mapper is created but it is virtually empty (except for a char
device).
I was asking what populates /dev/mapper with the LV devices.
OK, that's all you get from the kernel, the other devices are created by
you
On 19.10.2014 14:54, Richard Melville wrote:
On 19 October 2014 12:15, Andrei Banu andrei.b...@redhost.ro
mailto:andrei.b...@redhost.ro wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build the classic LFS 7.6 with the only difference
that it's on LVM
instead of normal partitions. I am quite fuzzy
On 10/19/14 12:42, 이승범 wrote:
Hello, everyone..
I have a trouble while building 6.13. BInutils-2.24 in LFS 7.6 stable
version.
Are there any hints please..?
Thank you for your reading..
--8--8--8--8--8--
root:/sources/7.6# tar -xjf
Below was understood as top post...
Sorry about that..
root:/sources/7.6# tar -xjf binutils-2.24.tar.bz2
root:/sources/7.6# cd binutils-2.24
root:/sources/7.6/binutils-2.24# expect -c spawn ls
spawn ls
root:/sources/7.6/binutils-2.24# rm -fv etc/standards.info
removed 'etc/standards.info'
Hello, everyone..
I have a trouble while building 6.13. BInutils-2.24 in LFS 7.6 stable
version.
Are there any hints please..?
root:/sources/7.6# tar -xjf binutils-2.24.tar.bz2
root:/sources/7.6# cd binutils-2.24
root:/sources/7.6/binutils-2.24# expect -c spawn ls
spawn ls
On 19 October 2014 14:53, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.org wrote:
On Oct 19, 2014, at 6:15, Andrei Banu andrei.b...@redhost.ro wrote:
I am trying to build the classic LFS 7.6 with the only difference that
it's on LVM
instead of normal partitions. I am quite fuzzy about systemd so
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:19:57 +0900
이승범 mach...@gmail.com wrote:
It's looks like that email server filter part of email as top post.
root:/sources/7.6/binutils-2.24# patch -Np1 -i
../binutils-2.24-load_gcc_lto_plugin_by_default-1.patch
patching file binutils/ar.c
patching file binutils/nm.c
On 19/10/14 17:14, 이승범 wrote:
Dejagnu treats this as an error, but the summary report shows
clearly that it is not a test failure. It is an unresolved
testcase. In other words, there is something about your system that
prevented the test from giving a clear result. That does not
On Oct 19, 2014, at 6:15, Andrei Banu andrei.b...@redhost.ro wrote:
I am trying to build the classic LFS 7.6 with the only difference that it's
on LVM
instead of normal partitions. I am quite fuzzy about systemd so I probably
gave
a wrong answer regarding systemd on a previous reply.
On Oct 19, 2014, at 9:35, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com
wrote:
He says he's *not* building systemd.
Richard
Ah classic LFS. I’m sorry. Still make sure LVM2 is installed.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
16 matches
Mail list logo