Re: [lfs-support] Alsa Drivers Keep loading, even blacklisted

2016-02-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:20:21PM -0600, Rob wrote: > Thanos Baloukas wrote: > >On 3.19.1 kernel the module name is snd-hda-intel with `-', not `_' > >Are you sure you are using the correct module name? > It doesn't matter. Modprobe.d automatically replaces dashes and

Re: [lfs-support] tftp

2016-02-05 Thread Paul Rogers
> It's general use in the past has been for loading the kernel on a thin > client on a secure network. If you don't need it, then there is no > need to keep it. May one conclude from the lack of any mention of another compelling use, there is none? Nothing involving some of the new-fangled

[lfs-support] (brief) p.s. -- Re: Find /bin /usr /var - package manager

2016-02-05 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:23:21 + > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > To: LFS Support List > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Find /bin /usr /var - package manager > > > Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:13:41 + (UTC) > > From: > > To: Lfs

Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs

2016-02-05 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:47:20 + > From: Ken Moffat > To: LFS Support List > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:39:33AM +, akhiezer wrote: > > . .

Re: [lfs-support] Find /bin /usr /var - package manager

2016-02-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Paul Rogers wrote: git had a few minor short-comings, IMO, and some of the syntaxes it used fail with modern versions of the utilities. pio only exists on my computers, I don't have a place to host it. I *think* if I attached it, it might be available, but I wouldn't do so without permission

Re: [lfs-support] Alsa Drivers Keep loading, even blacklisted

2016-02-05 Thread Rob
Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 3.19.1 kernel the module name is snd-hda-intel with `-', not `_' Are you sure you are using the correct module name? It doesn't matter. Modprobe.d automatically replaces dashes and underscores, according to the man page. Just to be sure, however,

[lfs-support] Alsa Drivers Keep loading, even blacklisted

2016-02-05 Thread Rob
I ask here because module blacklisting is mentioned in the lfs book. I have 3 cards on my system: an onboard and two PCI cards. I want the onboard one to not load. It is too quiet and I can barely hear it; so it is therefore useless for my purposes. It is an Intel board, so in

Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs

2016-02-05 Thread Richard Melville
On 5 February 2016 at 17:47, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:39:33AM +, akhiezer wrote: >> >> Don't let 'em (2ndary-os's) fk around with your main os - at least, at >> (2ndary-os) install time - don't let them even see it: perhaps - if using >> a single

Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs

2016-02-05 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 04-02-2016 19:09, Ken Moffat escreveu: > This time, I would like to be able to use distros (different from > what other people are using to test) to build release candidates. > > Ideally, I want to be able to install/replace these in the future, > telling them to only use their own partition,

Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs

2016-02-05 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:09:09 + > From: Ken Moffat > To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Subject: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs > > Sorry for asking an O/T question here, but -chat seems to be full of > people who don't actually use LFS

Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs

2016-02-05 Thread Richard Melville
On 5 February 2016 at 05:29, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> >> Sorry for asking an O/T question here, but -chat seems to be full of >> people who don't actually use LFS (judging from replies I've seen >> there in the past few months). >> >> I've got a new