Re: [lfs-support] asm-goto support SOLVED
Am 28.10.2018 um 22:49 schrieb Ken Moffat: Thanks for coming back. I did not think that anything would be linked to libelf, so can you be more-specific about what you had moved, please, so we can save the information for the next time ? Hi Ken, the story is a little complicated. I finished my LFS-8.3 with some dificulties building Linux-4.18.5. ( make menuconfig did'nt start at all ) So I decided to take the lfskernel and System.map from my LFS-8.1 (linux-4.12.7 ) to start booting anyway my new LFS-8.3. To my surprise, the system did not boot at all, with very strange messages concerning the partition "/dev/sdb4" ( xfs ) like partition corrupted or cannot find the partition etc. At this point I decided to mount my LFS-8.1 system on this partition, and LFS-8.1 booted without problems. So, I started copying the directories from the new LFS-8.3 to the old LFS-8.1 and booting in between. During this procedure I had not yet copied the libelf files ( libelf-0.173.s0, libelf.a, libelf.so and libelf.so.1 ) to /usr/lib, with the mentioned results. BTW, my LFS-8.3, constructed in this very unusual way, is now working as expected ! I hope this information can be usefull ! Kind regards, Edgar -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] asm-goto support SOLVED
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 09:01:16PM +0100, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: > > > Am 27.10.2018 um 18:56 schrieb Ken Moffat: > > try to untar and configure a small package > > (one which uses configure, obviously). If that reports that the C > > compiler cannot create executables then one of those suggestions > > seems to apply. > hi Kenn, > > /tools is not more present in my LFS. I did ./configure on "lynx2-8-8" and I > got > "checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler > cannot create executables" > So I started to look for libelf, as you wrote, and voila, I found that for > some reasons I had moved this files from the original place. After putting > them back, the compiler started working normal. > > Thank you very much for your help. Without your hint , I would probably not > found how to proceed ! > > Kind regards, > Edgar Thanks for coming back. I did not think that anything would be linked to libelf, so can you be more-specific about what you had moved, please, so we can save the information for the next time ? Glad you are now sorted. ĸen -- Is it about a bicycle ? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] asm-goto support SOLVED
Am 27.10.2018 um 18:56 schrieb Ken Moffat: try to untar and configure a small package (one which uses configure, obviously). If that reports that the C compiler cannot create executables then one of those suggestions seems to apply. hi Kenn, /tools is not more present in my LFS. I did ./configure on "lynx2-8-8" and I got "checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables" So I started to look for libelf, as you wrote, and voila, I found that for some reasons I had moved this files from the original place. After putting them back, the compiler started working normal. Thank you very much for your help. Without your hint , I would probably not found how to proceed ! Kind regards, Edgar -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
