- Original Message -
> From: "Libo Chen"
> To: "Dhaval Giani"
> Cc: "Ivana Hutarova Varekova" , "Wengmeiling"
> , "Libcg Development
> list" , "Li Zefan" ,
> "Huang Qiang"
> Sent: Wednesd
On 2013/8/27 21:12, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi Libo,
>
>>> $ ls -y
>>> ls: illegal option -- y
>>> usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
>>>
>>> I would like something like this.
>>
>>
>> yes, it is the bash style. But this patch follows libcg style, this is
>> important too
Hi Libo,
>> $ ls -y
>> ls: illegal option -- y
>> usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
>>
>> I would like something like this.
>
>
> yes, it is the bash style. But this patch follows libcg style, this is
> important too?
>
I am not sure I understand the comment. Why can'
On 2013/8/15 1:34, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Libo Chen
> wrote:
>> On 2013/8/14 11:24, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Libo Chen
>>> wrote:
On 2013/8/14 4:37, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Libo C
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2013/8/6 15:15, Libo Chen wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Ivana,
>
> what do you think about this patch ?
Could you please address my comments?
Thanks,
Dhaval
--
In
On 2013/8/6 15:15, Libo Chen wrote:
Hi Ivana,
what do you think about this patch ?
>
> we should check invalite parameter, and then print a warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen
> ---
> src/tools/cgconfig.c | 10 +-
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> di
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2013/8/14 11:24, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Libo Chen
>> wrote:
>>> On 2013/8/14 4:37, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Libo Chen
wrote:
>
> we should check inval
On 2013/8/14 11:24, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Libo Chen
> wrote:
>> On 2013/8/14 4:37, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Libo Chen
>>> wrote:
we should check invalite parameter, and then print a warning
Signed-off-
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2013/8/14 4:37, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Libo Chen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> we should check invalite parameter, and then print a warning
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen
>>
>> I'm not sure this extra warning is
On 2013/8/14 4:37, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Libo Chen wrote:
>>
>> we should check invalite parameter, and then print a warning
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen
>
> I'm not sure this extra warning is needed. In most unix software, if
> you use an invalid argument, the
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Libo Chen wrote:
>
> we should check invalite parameter, and then print a warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen
I'm not sure this extra warning is needed. In most unix software, if
you use an invalid argument, the help is printed, which is exactly
what happens here
11 matches
Mail list logo