Am 24.02.2013 01:43, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de:
> In any case I concluded that firebird is above my head. I've spent an
> entire week trying to get a simple test case running, to no avail. I'm
> going to release libdbi-drivers without official firebird support
> unless someone steps up a
Am 19.02.2013 00:16, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de:
> Did you ever succeed in running the new test
> kit? Or the old one shipped with 0.8.3 fwiw?
hi,
i can't remeber on old kit passes and the new one has never pass.
christoph
--
Am 18.02.2013 10:43, schrieb Christoph Kottke:
> Am 18.02.2013 10:27, schrieb Markus Hoenicka:
>>> Classic does not require this step, but it doesn't work either. I'm
>>> sure that I miss some critical step in the procedure. What about
>>> accounts: do
Am 18.02.2013 10:27, schrieb Markus Hoenicka:
>> Classic does not require this step, but it doesn't work either. I'm
>> sure that I miss some critical step in the procedure. What about
>> accounts: do you run your queries from a regular user account? root?
>> firebird? Also, where do you create dat
Am 18.02.2013 00:51, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de:
> Christoph Kottke writes:
> > hi,
> >
> > i've installed the latest cvs revisions for libdbi and libdbi-driver and
> > when ever i try to fetch more than
> > 3 row from an firebird table it
hi,
i've installed the latest cvs revisions for libdbi and libdbi-driver and
when ever i try to fetch more than
3 row from an firebird table it's end in an segfault.
but when i revert the "bull patch" in dbi_result.c it works like a charm.
christoph
