Thank you Nighat, and thanks for sharing.
Very interesting indeed!
---
Marcin de Kaminski
Policy specialist - Freedom of expression/ICT | www.sida.se
Twitter: @dekaminski
2014-11-11 05:44 skrev Nighat Dad:
Hello all,
We have just published the second detailed article, examining the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrés,
I personally work with many angel investors who do not fit the devil
with a checkbook mold. These guys are heavily involved in greentech /
cleantech, people who are scared of climate change and are investing
money in developing next gen solar
Jens,
I did speak of tangents, secants, and lines with even more
intersections between profit and common good, didn't I?
But there is a huge gap, oceans of bad or just OK between those
intersections, few and far between, isn't it?
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L. Pacheco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If it helps, think of it as a Venn diagram. There is one set, that of
profitable scalable innovation. There is another set, that of F/LOSS
that give users digital freedom. Is there an intersection between
these two sets? What will we find if look?
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/14 12:37, hellekin wrote:
*** Indeed, there's an inherent conflict of interest. But free
software, free hardware, and liberation technologies suffer a
systematic lack of resources. If the only alternative to capital
investment is
On 10 November 2014 17:49, J.M. Porup j...@porup.com wrote:
Is it possible to make money investing in privacy- or security-focused
startups?
There is certainly an interest in the related technologies, but the
obstacles are the ones you would probably expect:
1. Commercial companies don't want
Hi LibTech
I am pleased to announce a new Citizen Lab publication, Communities @ Risk:
targeted digital threats against civil society.
Communities @ Risk is the culminating report of a multi-year, multi-group study
on targeted digital threats. We define targeted digital threats as persistent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/11/2014 09:00 AM, J.M. Porup wrote:
If it helps, think of it as a Venn diagram. There is one set, that of
profitable scalable innovation. There is another set, that of F/LOSS
that give users digital freedom. Is there an intersection between
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/14 08:48, hellekin wrote:
On 11/11/2014 09:00 AM, J.M. Porup wrote:
If it helps, think of it as a Venn diagram. There is one set,
that of profitable scalable innovation. There is another set,
that of F/LOSS that give users digital
Everything Gunner said +5. The long view is critical here. I am ashamed
Aspiration wasn't the first place I pointed to as a successful model,
but I know Gunner will forgive me.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014, at 01:59 AM, Allen Gunn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Jesse,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/11/2014 10:58 AM, J.M. Porup wrote:
It's been said the hardest part of solving any problem is to state the
problem clearly. I cannot offer any answers.
At least not yet.
*** Thank you very much for tackling it though. It's a hard
Venn Diagrams are so lame that they were deprecated a long time ago as
the basis of official Math! ROFL
what I'd be interested to know regarding angel investors and Chile, is
exactly what is meant by this statement in the website originally
referenced in the email starting this thread:
We can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/14 09:36, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes wrote:
what I'd be interested to know regarding angel investors and
Chile, is exactly what is meant by this statement in the website
originally referenced in the email starting this thread:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm here at IETF 91 hanging with all the protocol nerds. I was talking
to someone about OTR and they pointed out that the object-encryption
standard for XMPP that has been put forward is about to die due to
lack of interest and engagement:
14 matches
Mail list logo
