-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Wraith was heard to say:
What
should give one pause is how four people who many regard as great
legal minds could, given the
CLEAR history of the Founders/Framers intentions come to such a
badly mistaken conclusion.
I
in the extreme as a fight strategy. But Rand was
antecedent to Smith in this matter.
- Original Message -
From: Curt Howland
To: LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. was heard to say:
No Ayn Rand was prophetic.
She was the first to identify, explicitly, that granting ANY
portion of a statists premise results in a backdoor for the statist
to walk thru.
El Neil formulated that one beautifully. Great quote. Thanks Curt.
- Original Message -
From: Curt Howland
To: LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible
-BEGIN PGP
Quoting Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. was heard to say:
What I find extraordinary if I don't need a permit for speaking why
do I need a permit for carrying?
Answer me that Supreme Court
:45 PM
Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible
Quoting Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. was heard to say:
What I find extraordinary if I don't need a permit
Curt Howland wrote:
It is moral weakness, rather than villainy, that accounts for
most of the evil in the universe -- and feeble-hearted allies, far
rather than your most powerful enemies, who are likeliest to do you
an injury you cannot recover from.
I see no reason for the from at all.
goat! wrote:
It which case wording would have been better.
Ooo Ooo! I could be a Grammar Nazi!
In which case your wording would have been better.
I swear that is what I wrote, till it zoomed away.
Goat
Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote:
The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the attorney
hadn't conceded the point.
He was just doing his job well.
Goat
!
To: LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible
Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote:
The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the attorney
hadn't conceded the point.
He was just
At 03:42 PM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
--- In
mailto:LibertarianEnterprise%40yahoogroups.comLibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com,
Robert D. Silvetz,
M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whose giving up. All I have pointed out is that this historic
decision is mostly laughable and won't do a whole
At 06:15 PM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote:
The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the
attorney hadn't conceded the point.
He was just doing his job well.
Goat
Keep in mind that this was a VERY split decision. If not given that
out, it could
is a good cause reason for having a CCW since
it is not clear to me that I can open-carry in Cali.
- Original Message -
From: Wraith
To: LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible
13 matches
Mail list logo
