Re: [Libguestfs] libnbd | Failed pipeline for master | 0b587f8a

2023-09-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:52:07PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 04:49:53PM +, GitLab wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Pipeline #996353812 has failed!
> > 
> > Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd )
> > Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master )
> > 
> > Commit: 0b587f8a ( 
> > https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/0b587f8a4f3e61e27985b8a3f66a3d7da45c00ef
> >  )
> > Commit Message: info: Prefer NBD_OPT_INFO when possible
> > 
> > Now th...
> > Commit Author: Eric Blake ( https://gitlab.com/ebblake )
> > 
> > 
> > Pipeline #996353812 ( 
> > https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/pipelines/996353812 ) triggered by Eric 
> > Blake ( https://gitlab.com/ebblake )
> > had 2 failed jobs.
> > 
> > Job #5039934820 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/5039934820/raw )
> > 
> > Stage: builds
> > Name: x86_64-fedora-rawhide-clang-prebuilt-env
> > Job #5039934815 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/5039934815/raw )
> > 
> > Stage: builds
> > Name: x86_64-fedora-rawhide-prebuilt-env

Sorry, somehow I didn't see this email yesterday.

> Expected transient failures; we haven't quite finished packaging
> nbdkit 1.35.12 and pushing it out to rawhide.
>
> Should I do another patch that widens the version check to cover
> 1.35.11 in addition to 1.34.[012]?  Or can we just live with this on
> the grounds that rawhide suffers from being bleeding edge, and it will
> clear up soon?

I did a release today of:

nbdkit 1.35.12
   1.34.3

libnbd 1.17.5
   1.16.4

No "live" versions of nbdkit should be affected by the crashing bug.
However it'll take a while to work their way into the system.

I would just ignore it TBH, unless we're still getting failures after
a few more weeks in which case we can think about what to do.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs



Re: [Libguestfs] libnbd | Failed pipeline for master | 0b587f8a

2023-09-07 Thread Eric Blake
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 04:49:53PM +, GitLab wrote:
> 
> 
> Pipeline #996353812 has failed!
> 
> Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd )
> Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master )
> 
> Commit: 0b587f8a ( 
> https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/0b587f8a4f3e61e27985b8a3f66a3d7da45c00ef
>  )
> Commit Message: info: Prefer NBD_OPT_INFO when possible
> 
> Now th...
> Commit Author: Eric Blake ( https://gitlab.com/ebblake )
> 
> 
> Pipeline #996353812 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/pipelines/996353812 
> ) triggered by Eric Blake ( https://gitlab.com/ebblake )
> had 2 failed jobs.
> 
> Job #5039934820 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/5039934820/raw )
> 
> Stage: builds
> Name: x86_64-fedora-rawhide-clang-prebuilt-env
> Job #5039934815 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/5039934815/raw )
> 
> Stage: builds
> Name: x86_64-fedora-rawhide-prebuilt-env

Expected transient failures; we haven't quite finished packaging
nbdkit 1.35.12 and pushing it out to rawhide.

Should I do another patch that widens the version check to cover
1.35.11 in addition to 1.34.[012]?  Or can we just live with this on
the grounds that rawhide suffers from being bleeding edge, and it will
clear up soon?

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libguestfs.org
___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs