>> Remind me again what was the reason for numbering it this way? I'm
>> sure there was one, I just can't remember what it was.
>
> I'm not sure there was a reason, or at least I can't find anything that jogs
> my memory looking back through the logs. One possible culprit, though - the
> orderi
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Benjamin Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Remind me again what was the reason for numbering it this way? I'm
>> sure there was one, I just can't remember what it was.
>
> I'm not sure there was a reason, or at least I can't find anything that jogs
> my memory loo
> Remind me again what was the reason for numbering it this way? I'm
> sure there was one, I just can't remember what it was.
I'm not sure there was a reason, or at least I can't find anything that jogs
my memory looking back through the logs. One possible culprit, though - the
ordering of our p
There's some more strange things going on with the pyramid...
In the definition of the geometric element (src/geom/cell_pyramid5.C)
the numbering of the base is *clockwise* instead of following the
usual counter-clockwise numbering used by e.g. Hexes. The
build_side() code in the class is self-co
