Re: [Libmesh-devel] More Attachable QoI Work

2012-09-19 Thread Paul T. Bauman
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > "by default, does nothing to maintain backward compatibility" should > read "by default does nothing, to maintain backward compatibility". > Sentences which reverse meaning based on comma placement are always > amusing. > Ha! > I wouldn't

Re: [Libmesh-devel] More Attachable QoI Work

2012-09-19 Thread Roy Stogner
"by default, does nothing to maintain backward compatibility" should read "by default does nothing, to maintain backward compatibility". Sentences which reverse meaning based on comma placement are always amusing. I wouldn't call the thread_join stuff "sys_qoi" in the code or "system qoi" in the

[Libmesh-devel] More Attachable QoI Work

2012-09-19 Thread Paul T. Bauman
Roy and I discussed offline how an attachable QoI should interact with the System-stored QoI. After some discussion, we converged on the idea of having a "CompositeQoI" (or whatever name you wish) that could stash multiple DifferentiableQoI objects. Then, using new virtual methods, the composite gu