On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Certainly at one point we assumed 1d meshes would only have x!=0, so rotating
> would be precluded.
>
> I think that is still the case, for example in defining the "normal" to a 1d
> boundary.
Double-checking fe_boundary.C... yeah, you'r
Certainly at one point we assumed 1d meshes would only have x!=0, so rotating
would be precluded.
I think that is still the case, for example in defining the "normal" to a 1d
boundary.
-Ben
On Sep 14, 2012, at 12:09 PM, "Vetter Roman" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What's the reason for asserting
>
Hi!
What's the reason for asserting
mesh.mesh_dimension() != 1
in MeshTools::Modification::rotate()? Rotating a 1D mesh seems to work for me
in opt mode, but the assertion obviously fails in dbg mode.
Best regards,
Roman
