Hi everyone,
Blitz++ had a similar design
> to Eigen but with good support for higher order... but what's up with
> their development? Looks like there's half a dozen people still
> churning away at their CVS tree, but no tarball releases since 2005??
>
blitz++ is still alive and we are prepari
to my mind, Blitz++ is indeed the best choice for implementing tensor
calculus!
2011/6/10 Boyce Griffith
> On 6/10/11 12:05 PM, John Peterson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ataollah Mesgarnejad
> > wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> Is there a way to implement a fourth order tensor
On 6/10/11 12:05 PM, John Peterson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ataollah Mesgarnejad
> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Is there a way to implement a fourth order tensor A_ijkl using libmesh
>> native classes?
>
> Nope.
>
>> If not how do you recommend to do it ?
>
> If it has a fixed size
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, John Peterson wrote:
> If you want to bring external libraries into the mix, there is
> probably a good one out there. Don't know of one off the top of my
> head.
Boost multiarray is the best such general container I've heard of.
Eigen does some excellent work with numeric
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ataollah Mesgarnejad
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is there a way to implement a fourth order tensor A_ijkl using libmesh native
> classes?
Nope.
> If not how do you recommend to do it ?
If it has a fixed size I * J * K * L:
Real tensor[I][J][K][L];
If the size is v
Dear all,
Is there a way to implement a fourth order tensor A_ijkl using libmesh native
classes? If not how do you recommend to do it ?
Best,
Ata
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
a
