On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Roy Stogner wrote:
> The Elem:: methods both look good to me. I'll add those to SVN right
> away. Thanks!
Oh, one slight change:
It's possible for an active element to have children or for an element
with children to have no active descendants. We allow the existance
of
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Gong Ding wrote:
> The boundary specify in libmesh is limited. I added more routines to support
> boundary process during my work.
>
> I hope these routines can be accepted by libmesh developers.
In the future it would be easiest for us to work with attached patch
files (th
The boundary specify in libmesh is limited. I added more routines to support
boundary process during my work.
I hope these routines can be accepted by libmesh developers.
The two member functions for elem.C
/**
* Same as the \p family_tree() member, but only adds elements
* which ar
