On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:49 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 24 of April 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:31 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
All switches are by default on enable state and we check for the deps.
If the damn deps are not present on the system we switch
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 13:51 +0100, Mark Stanton wrote:
We have seen that if you do a search over a form in base, the speed of
the search in the form goes very slow in the second search once you have
reached the last register of the table.
We have a Base with HSQL.
Hi Egon,
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 18:15 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 18 of April 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
We moved to using the compiler stl on windows as well. The compiler
provided list header on msvc 2008 itself triggers a warning, which is
a real pain for WaE.
What warning would
Hi. i send a patch for libreoffice (fich dociter.cxx)
thanks
From f06ff5d955df6ea445490cf502b3720c2d361991 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose Manuel jmreca...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:50:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dociter.cxx
---
core/sc/source/core/data/dociter.cxx |5 -
1
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:19:51PM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
just a short note (maybe to be discussed in the ESC call):
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/
is overloaded with obsolete repositories, making it hard for a curious
newcomer
to find
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:45:38PM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I wonder, by the way, if we really need to have all the
configurability we currently have...
As generic as the question is: probably not.
As someone who does releases on a fixed schedule, I find quite a
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.3.2 tag for 3.5.3-rc2
release. The corresponding official builds will be available within
next few days. It will be used as final if no blocker is found.
See the attached list of changes against 3.5.3-rc1.
Now, you might switch your current 3-5
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 18:29 +0200, Xavi Escriche Galindo wrote:
Basically ok, pushed. You missed to remove it from the header as well.
Though this turns out to be one of the tricky edge cases and not so easy
after all :-).
All fixed up and pushed. Can you confirm this is under our preferred
On Tuesday 24 of April 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:49 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Right now all those 100 developers have to have a long list of options,
half of them because they are needed, other half because they'd prefer
not to build repeatedly stuff they already
On Tuesday 24 of April 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 18:15 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 18 of April 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
We moved to using the compiler stl on windows as well. The compiler
provided list header on msvc 2008 itself triggers a warning,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:15:53PM +0100, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com
wrote:
Can you merge that with (the equally horrible equivalent and partial
hack) in ww8par.cxx (search for LANGUAGE_RUSSIAN) and put it someplace
shared ?
Sure - does the attached patch looks sane? It definitely
Running ./autogen.sh --with-system-libs fails as soon as it finds
one external library that does not exist system-wide (and there's pretty
much bound to be one, given what all kinds of libs we use).
build as an user which does not have additional (local) libraries installed ?
So one has to
Hey Daniel,
welcome to this years GSoC. I'm looking forward to work with you on calc.
I talked with Markus briefly, and we think that as a starter, we
should stay on the xlsx import code and make a few more improvements
there before moving on to other areas. We have already covered the
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:40 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:15:53PM +0100, Caolán McNamara
caol...@redhat.com wrote:
Can you merge that with (the equally horrible equivalent and partial
hack) in ww8par.cxx (search for LANGUAGE_RUSSIAN) and put it someplace
shared ?
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:27 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
This one has nearly killed me trying to track down because its *so*
variable, but unusably slow with large documents
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48011
First - thanks for nearly laying down your life here ! :-)
On 24/04/12 08:56, Noel Grandin wrote:
Hi
This series of patches converts various datastructures in the SW module
from SV*PTRARR to std::vector, std::set, and boost::ptr_set variously.
so the first patch, which Caolan already pushed, causes a segfault in
dbaccess_complex, because of a
Hi all,
I found an unusually overwriting assignment at index 1 in
SvxShapeCollection::getSupportedServiceNames_Static() as follows:
---
diff --git a/svx/source/unodraw/unoshcol.cxx b/svx/source/unodraw/unoshcol.cxx
index 1e02c9c..1c45081 100644
--- a/svx/source/unodraw/unoshcol.cxx
+++
--
__
José Santiago Jiménez Sarmiento
*-- AVISO --*
Mensaje confidencial. Queda terminantemente prohibido la publicación de su
contenido a terceros sin mi autorización, según obliga la Ley Orgánica de
Protección de Datos (LOPD) del 15/1999 y posterior R.D.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 19:03, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
so the first patch, which Caolan already pushed, causes a segfault in
dbaccess_complex, because of a double free in
SwXTextView::removeSelectionChangeListener: the
boost::ptr_vector::erase() actually deletes the element.
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:58 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:27 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
maybe the proposed gtk3 one is sufficient for gtk3,
definitely the alternative impl *seems* ok for gtk2 is I enable it
locally experimentally.
Really ? I recall reading
On 04/24/2012 10:18 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
But there is one more known problem remaining (duplicate
implementation
name='com.sun.star.comp.Draw.framework.PresenterScreenJob' that Miklos
and Arnaud ran into) that I have not yet fixed.
The cause for this should now be fixed with
Hi all,
I am looking for comments on:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/103/
which I assume will make partial builds in tail_build quite a bit faster.
Opinions most welcome.
Best,
Bjoern
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi all,
When doing changes to code that can end up as extensions, esp. bundled
ones, it is important to increment the corresponding extension version
number. This is not always obvious.
Stephan
On 04/24/2012 08:23 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
commit de562138eabd3ee3ecab28e5d1348a3fee7301e0
Hi,
an easyhack, to get a feeling of success while trying to understand
import of SVGs.
Christina
From 5b90ab4c0053c09bbd49f1bf3024d70cfb32af6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chr. Rossmanith chr.rossman...@gmx.de
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:09:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Removed unused methods
On 04/24/2012 07:03 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
it would of course be nice if the f..ine documentation would mention
that erase() will delete the element, but i can't find that fact
mentioned here:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/ptr_container/doc/ptr_sequence_adapter.html
It kind of
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:16 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Running ./autogen.sh --with-system-libs fails as soon as it finds one
external library that does not exist system-wide (and there's pretty much
bound to be one, given what all kinds of libs we use)
Aha, so I suspect this boils down to
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 19:03 +0100, José Santiago Jiménez Sarmiento
What bothers me about the unused GetNextVisPortion in editeng is that
GetPrevVisPortion is not unused, and in
EditView::SetSelection I wonder if the *second* GetPrevVisPortion should
have been GetNextVisPortion all along.
Hi Noel,
Sorry, this took too long..
On Wednesday, 2012-04-18 21:01:41 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
I've been looking at providing support for the repeating character
in number formats. I've been playing abit with the code and what I
have sofar seems to work reasonably well ( no doubt there are
You mean other than Nice work! :-)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 20:32, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for comments on:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/103/
which I assume will make partial builds in tail_build quite a bit faster.
Opinions most
Hello.
Bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31005
Patch:
=
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=60462
Patch review:
===
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=splinter.htmlbug=31005attachment=60462
Summary:
=
Extended the number of properties
Hi Caolan,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 19:03 +0100, José Santiago Jiménez Sarmiento
What bothers me about the unused GetNextVisPortion in editeng is that
GetPrevVisPortion is not unused, and in
EditView::SetSelection I
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:05:39 +0200, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Marco Cecchetti wrote:
About this last point I'd like to know if there is interest in
performing test on IE 10 that at present is supported only by
Windows 8.
If you have the means to do so - greatly
Hi:
I send you a patch in order to erase the unused code:
formula::FormulaTokenArray::AddBad(unsigned short const*).
Best Regards
Javier
patch_token
Description: Binary data
patch_token2
Description: Binary data
patch_token3
Description: Binary data
Marco Cecchetti wrote:
Btw, what is LibreOffice policy for rebasing a feature branch ?
I'd defer to Kendy here. :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp3Yvr3oKGDe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Most of the code looks to be in svgreader.cxx.
It walks the DOM tree, starting with the writeShapes method, and it
looks like it processes text nodes at around line 1471.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 22:15, Christina Roßmanith chrrossman...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm still trying to understand how SVG
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
Only 0002-WaE-Clang-unused-variable.patch and
0003-WaE-Clang-unused-variable.patch I did not push. Can you change them as
I suggested above (or just let me know if you want me to do that)?
I attached updated patches
Hi everyone,
this patch removes the unused destructor in the ImpSvtData class, as listed in
unusedcode.easy
From bdfc550685d238a62602a4f93da0ab804d77b2f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Javier Catala j_cat...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:24:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused
Hello! I am begginer in software libre colaboration.
I hope I can enter fully into this world and in the future be a good
collaborator.
Thanks.
--
__
José Santiago Jiménez Sarmiento
*-- AVISO --*
Mensaje confidencial. Queda terminantemente prohibido la
--
__
José Santiago Jiménez Sarmiento
*-- AVISO --*
Mensaje confidencial. Queda terminantemente prohibido la publicación de su
contenido a terceros sin mi autorización, según obliga la Ley Orgánica de
Protección de Datos (LOPD) del 15/1999 y posterior R.D.
--
__
José Santiago Jiménez Sarmiento
*-- AVISO --*
Mensaje confidencial. Queda terminantemente prohibido la publicación de su
contenido a terceros sin mi autorización, según obliga la Ley Orgánica de
Protección de Datos (LOPD) del 15/1999 y posterior R.D.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Bug 37361 depends on bug 4, which changed state.
Bug 4 Summary: Print to File creates faulty pdf
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
What|Old Value |New Value
Proposed patch attached to use the gnome-open/xdg-open URI handler,
with a mailto link, when the currently configured mailer is not
recognized.
0001-Fall-back-to-using-the-GNOME-mailto-URI-handler-if-n.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v So 21. 04. 2012 v 10:49 +0200:
Hi Fridrich, *,
this mail never reached the l10n@ and projects@ but only the LibO-QA. Is
there a problem with the mail-system or something else?
It is by purpose. We should probably update the subject to make it more
clear. What
Petr Mladek schrieb:
It is by purpose. We should probably update the subject to make it more
clear. What about the following?
[ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 builds available for pre-testing
Hi,
I believe that's a good Idea, subject for these first announcements
should be amended as
Am 24.04.2012 10:51, schrieb Pedro:
Hi Petr
The original message was sent to
LibreOfficelibreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org,
l...@global.libreoffice.org,
proje...@global.libreoffice.org,
Libreoffice-qalibreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
If it didn't reach l10n and projects, it means that
Hi,
On Tuesday 24 April 2012, 10:46:16 Petr Mladek wrote:
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v So 21. 04. 2012 v 10:49 +0200:
Am 20.04.2012 12:44, schrieb Fridrich Strba:
Builds are now being uploaded to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't
spread news too widely!) place, as soon as
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
Do we/you need more information/ more time - or is it just different heart
feelings?
Shall we make an operational tradeoff by defining a test period of, say, one
year?
For me, the matter itself is not that important, I can arrange with both
Nino Novak píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up to
you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf Board the right gremium? I don't
know)
There is strong conflicting
Roman píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Am 23.04.12 12:38, schrieb Nino Novak:
in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48329 the second attachment
(help_poster.doc) has been uploaded by user mikebgx, as shown correctly in
the
entry in the Attachments section on top.
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.3.2 tag for 3.5.3-rc2
release. The corresponding official builds will be available within
next few days. It will be used as final if no blocker is found.
See the attached list of changes against 3.5.3-rc1.
Now, you might switch your current 3-5
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:54:23PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Nino Novak píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up
to
you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf
Hi dE,
I am happy to read this because I see a nice solution from what you
wrote.
dE . píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 10:55 +0530:
On 04/23/12 20:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
Yes, absolutely, the MAB should be in a reasonable limit such that it
looks 'solvable'.
Exactly. We need to keep the 50 or
Hi dE,
thanks for the list.
dE . píše v Ne 22. 04. 2012 v 10:50 +0530:
I suggestion addition of the following bugs -
Bug 32991 -- This's farely used in doc document, and may break the
complete formatting of the document in some cases.
Yup, it is something that we really should fix.
Bug
Nino Novak wrote:
BTW - do you have actual numbers? How many downloads do we actually have and
how many does the server allow maximally? And about how many bugs have been
reported in the 24-h-period in the past?
Hi Nino,
the announcement is to be taken project-internal, i.e. addressing
Hello,
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
It's a bug reporter like this that makes me lose hope in a FOSS
project such as this one.
Best,
Kohei
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
Hello Kohei,
I believe OfficeUser had a bad day when he wrote that lousy bad and
incomplete report with wild speculations instead of reviewable facts.
We should not attach
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42473
--- Comment #13 from Michael Pappas painful...@gmail.com 2012-04-24 00:08:39
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
Can someone please report whether this persists with the released 3.5.2?
I have tested it yesterday at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Laurent BP jumbo4...@yahoo.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jumbo4...@yahoo.fr
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48278
mournbl...@gmx.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://www.libreoffice.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48921
mournbl...@gmx.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mournbl...@gmx.us
See
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49095
Bug #: 49095
Summary: Pivot Table sort drop down shows inappropriate options
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: LibO 3.5.2 Release
Platform: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #1 from Giuliano giuliano.lo...@gmail.com 2012-04-24 00:56:57 PDT
---
Similar to bug 36379
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49097
Bug #: 49097
Summary: EDITING: Bibliography
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: LibO 3.5.1 Release
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #8 from Jaime Navarro jaime.nava...@alu.umh.es 2012-04-24
01:00:11 PDT ---
[Reproduced] with LibreOffice 3.5.2 - Debian 6.0.4 i386 English UI
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
--- Comment #1 from Ángel Luis García García angellui...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
01:06:56 PDT ---
[Reproducible] with LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 - Windows XP SP3 (32bit) Spanish UI
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46193
Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|EasyHack DifficultyBeginner |EasyHack
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49097
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44595
--- Comment #1 from Ángel Luis García García angellui...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
01:16:28 PDT ---
[Not Reproducible] with LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 - Windows XP SP3 (32bit) Spanish
UI
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49098
Bug #: 49098
Summary: idxexample.odt cleanup
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: LibO Master
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49098
Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Status Whiteboard|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49094
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49095
pharmankur pharman...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Pivot Table sort drop down |PivotTable sort drop
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49099
Bug #: 49099
Summary: Locking elements in master slides should keep them
locked in later use.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: unspecified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49076
--- Comment #1 from Jaime Navarro jaime.nava...@alu.umh.es 2012-04-24
01:37:43 PDT ---
[Not Reproduced] with LibreOffice 3.5.2 - Debian 6.0.4 i386 English UI
Only appear the number when you copy the whole sentence:
e.g: 1. aaa bbb ccc
The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47461
--- Comment #5 from Ángel Luis García García angellui...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
01:42:16 PDT ---
[Not Reproducible] with LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 - Windows XP SP3 Professional
(32bit) Spanish UI
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49091
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49101
Bug #: 49101
Summary: html.stw (default HTML template) cleanup
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: LibO Master
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49101
Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard||EasyHack DifficultyEasy
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49076
--- Comment #3 from q9 qqq...@web.de 2012-04-24 02:00:08 PDT ---
Perhaps i did not state clearly, the i format the text as list.
1. fgrecztr
2. trcztrdtz
3. trcertz
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48963
--- Comment #2 from Ángel Luis García García angellui...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
02:01:18 PDT ---
[Reproducible] with LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 - Windows XP SP3 Professional (32bit)
Spanish UI
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49100
m...@wanadoo.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |x86 (IA32)
OS/Version|All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45780
--- Comment #2 from Lionel Dricot pl...@ploum.net 2012-04-24 02:04:24 PDT ---
Could you confirm that, in order to fix this bug, there should be a new
accounting format (adding a button next to the currency format) which have
the following
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44137
--- Comment #2 from Ángel Luis García García angellui...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
02:10:09 PDT ---
[Reproducible] with LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 - Windows XP SP3 Professional (32bit)
Spanish UI
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49099
Michael Skiba opensou...@michael-skiba.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42842
--- Comment #3 from Ángel Luis García García angellui...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
02:25:03 UTC ---
[Not Reproducible] with LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 - Windows XP SP3 Professional
(32bit) Spanish UI
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48921
--- Comment #2 from David david.houl...@gmail.com 2012-04-24 02:42:07 PDT ---
Thanks for the suggestion but my resolution is 96x96 dots per inch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48278
--- Comment #2 from David david.houl...@gmail.com 2012-04-24 02:46:16 PDT ---
I am the person who raised bug 48921 and I am seeing the problem with 96 dpi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48278
David david.houl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
Bug #: 49102
Summary: Writer: Incorrect numbering when cells are merged in
the table
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: LibO 3.5.2 Release
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@orange.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||38176
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49101
Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Bug #: 49103
Summary: EDITING: Changing font colour on a bullet list does
not change the colour of bullet points or list
numbering
Classification: Unclassified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #1 from Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org 2012-04-24 03:18:36 PDT ---
Created attachment 60519
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=60519
The same document, after selecting all the text in the bullet list and changing
font
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35686
--- Comment #4 from Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org 2012-04-24 03:24:50 UTC ---
When you change the colour of a bullet list, you also expect the colour of the
bullet points to change. They don't.
Also, I have found no way to change the colour of a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35686
--- Comment #5 from Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org 2012-04-24 03:26:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
With Libre Office 3.3.3 on Win XP and Linux Mandriva 2010 x86, bullet color
can
be chosen in Format - Bullets and Numbering... - Customize -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rex.willho...@yahoo.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #3 from Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org 2012-04-24 03:28:40 PDT ---
In addition to these two problems, there is a third: I have been unable to find
any way to modify the colour of bullet points in an existing bullet list. Does
one exist?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35334
--- Comment #7 from Andy Rogers li...@andyscomp.f9.co.uk 2012-04-24 03:41:20
PDT ---
Still present in 3.5.3 RC1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
101 - 200 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
