Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Weekly Report (W42-2016)

2016-10-25 Thread Nino Novak
Thank you Xisco, for this nice human-readable report! A real advancement for LibO-QA, I believe :) Nino On 24.10.2016 09:34, Xisco Fauli wrote: What have happened in QA in the last week? [...] ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail

[Libreoffice-qa] bug #75554

2015-04-14 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, just had a glance at #75554 - could not reproduce the hanging, but kind of a slow rendering of some of the elements in the given test document (they look like ranges or graphic elements without content - or whatever those white areas are). Therefore it seems to take rather long for LibO for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Advanced Triaging - Tutorials?

2015-04-13 Thread Nino Novak
On 12.04.2015 21:25, Joel Madero wrote: There is a bug that needs some advanced QA work on it and I'm curious if anyone wants to take a stab at it and try to document the process (including screenshots and/or screen captures). https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75554

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] DLP Projects as products?

2015-02-13 Thread Nino Novak
On 13.02.2015 02:02, Robinson Tryon wrote: (I made the words BIGGER) https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi nice :) The only I'd change is the wording of the titles: - The projects you are looking for: + The projects you are probably looking for: - These are not the projects you

Re: [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.3.6 RC2 available

2015-02-12 Thread Nino Novak
On 11.02.2015 at 23:01, Christian Lohmaier wrote: A list of known issues and fixed bugs with 4.3.6 RC2 is available from our wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.3.6/RC2 the page is empty. Regards, Nino ___ LibreOffice mailing

[Libreoffice-qa] New bugzilla instance: Version information

2014-11-02 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, browsing through Thommy's UNCO bug list I felt the wish to know which was the - First (oldest) known version containing the bug - Last (youngest) version tested still containing the bug. So my question is: is it possible - does it make sense - or is it already planned to have these two

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: LibreOffice underline problem

2014-10-25 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Sooraj, Am 24.10.2014 um 11:01 schrieb sooraj kenoth: While using the LibreOffice, I have some problems with the the underline. In Malayalam we have a lot of stacked characters. In the current way of drawing underline, it strikes the stacked letters. It is annoying and it kills the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice Has Been Reviewed at ListOfFreeware

2014-10-22 Thread Nino Novak
The search on your website does not work. Regards, Nino Am 16.10.2014 um 07:44 schrieb Ubaid: Hello, I am Ubaid from www.listoffreeware.com http://www.listoffreeware.com/. This is a popular tech blog that lists best free software out there. I am sending this mail to let you know that we

Re: LibreOffice Weekly News #5 waiting for reviews

2014-09-13 Thread Nino Novak
Am 13.09.2014 um 03:25 schrieb William Gathoye: I've just finished to write the fifth edition of LOWN. [1] Very nice work, thanks :) The latter is waiting for your reviews. just one observation: citation numbers in the text go up to 58, but the last reference on the page bottom is 50, so a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] request for more boilerplate responses to bug report

2014-09-10 Thread Nino Novak
Am 10.09.2014 um 02:55 schrieb Terrence Enger: I have noticed that Urmas has been abruptly closing bug reports that are in languages other than English. What an arrogant behavior :-( How about first putting them into NEEDINFO state and asking for translation here or in the l10n list? There

[Libreoffice-qa] PT EN translation needed for bug report

2014-09-10 Thread Nino Novak
Could please someone understanding Portuguese have a look at these bugs and translate them: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83681 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83673 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83629 Thanks, Nino (proof of concept, QA + l10n lists)

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] PT EN translation needed for bug report

2014-09-10 Thread Nino Novak
Nino Novak: Could please someone understanding Portuguese have a look at these bugs and translate them: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83681 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83673 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83629 Thanks, Nino (proof of concept

Bug introduced during translation? (was: [Bug 39674] find / fix all German spellings in internal APIs)

2014-09-02 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, by chance I looked into this commit and seeing the lines cited below, I'm asking myself how many strange bugs or regressions are introduced this way. Here, the names of two variables were translated - which would be ok, but only if all of their occurences were changed accordingly. In this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bug 80220

2014-06-26 Thread Nino Novak
Hello Christian, Am 26.06.2014 10:06, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: But again @whoeverstartsathread: use telling summaries, give a link to click on and a small abstract about what is all about (in this case: inserted date-field loses locale/langauge-property on document reload). It makes life

[Libreoffice-qa] bug 80220 (was: Are there any germans in the house)

2014-06-25 Thread Nino Novak
Am 25.06.2014 08:47, schrieb Jay Philips: Hi All, I was going through bug 80220 and not able to reproduce it with the instructions provided bug the reporter mentions it effect writing english documents in a german system environment/localization. If someone could look at it, that would be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bug 80220

2014-06-25 Thread Nino Novak
Am 25.06.2014 10:56, schrieb Nino Novak: Am 25.06.2014 08:47, schrieb Jay Philips: Hi All, I was going through bug 80220 and not able to reproduce it with the instructions provided bug the reporter mentions it effect writing english documents in a german system environment/localization

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.2.5 RC2 available

2014-06-21 Thread Nino Novak
On 21.06.2014 11:56, Jay Philips wrote: I assume 4.2 cant become stable until 4.3 becomes fresh. :) which may be pragmatic but nevertheless sounds strange: it does not make 4.2.x more stable when 4.3.x is released. If the naming would follow quality criteria, like at least 95% of the reported

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice Bugzilla (migration) Proposal // Acronym

2013-11-11 Thread Nino Novak
Am 10.11.2013 07:24, schrieb Tommy: On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 07:28:36 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Hiya, As mentioned at the QA Meeting, I've provided a first draft of the proposal to migrate from FDO to our own install of Bugzilla:

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] UX enhancement for using styles (was: Re: LO's styles are more confusing then MSO's)

2013-09-27 Thread Nino Novak
Am 26.09.2013 22:27, schrieb Cor Nouws: I think I agree that it's not ideal. So thanks for the ideas, and let's try to work further on drafting what could be improved. I don't know if this belongs to this thread/list, but... I always wondered, why clicking on the bullet list button creates

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-users] Re: QA Triage Contest

2013-07-16 Thread Nino Novak
Am 15.07.2013 19:18, schrieb Tom Davies: Errr, that graph is rather confusing me. It's good when it dips lower, right? Although could that be bad in some way? Does it mean less bugs being reported? That's correct, so ideally the chart should simultaneously show the # of bugs reported.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Triage Contest

2013-07-15 Thread Nino Novak
Am 11.07.2013 16:36, schrieb Joel Madero: Hi All, So as you all know the contest is over and it was a great success. Just under 25% of the bug count dropped but substantially more bugs were triaged as we kept up with the daily demand on top of tackling older bug reports. Joel, can we see

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

2013-07-01 Thread Nino Novak
Am 27.06.2013 21:44, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most because of the Ubuntu issue. Can we maybe make the wording more explicit e.g. reached EOL at TDF(*)? 1) I'd

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Release configuration QA builds for Windows from 4-1 branch

2013-05-30 Thread Nino Novak
Am 30.05.2013 09:31, schrieb Fridrich Strba: ... we set a tinderbox ... Hi, where can I find these builds? Thanks, Nino ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning up QA Nabble and Archive folders from Spam?

2013-05-13 Thread Nino Novak
Am 13.05.2013 00:03, schrieb Thorsten Behrens: That's why we run it on fdo - such that you don't have to worry. ;) But in this case, IMHO we /have/ to worry a bit as there has been increasing spam impact in the last week or so. (For me personnaly it's even a bit more annoying as I'm reading

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Wiki pages cruft cleanup

2013-04-02 Thread Nino Novak
Am 02.04.2013 11:45, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: Hi, I cleaned up: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA a big +1 Nino ___ List Name:

[Libreoffice-qa] Moztrap: Test case export?

2013-03-28 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, is there an test case export feature from Moztrap? In what kind of database are the cases stored? I'm asking because I somehow feel the necessity to organize the cases according to my own preferences. Therefore I thought it would be fine to export them and experiment locally. With

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Page for BSA process in other languages

2013-03-21 Thread Nino Novak
Am 21.03.2013 18:59, schrieb Sophie Gautier: This is a process, not intended for users of the BSA but dedicated to the NL QA teams and its organization, of course l10n of the page will follow so moving the page after will be more difficult. So I would like to follow the QA project rules here.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Moztrap rights

2013-03-21 Thread Nino Novak
Thank you, Yifan. and as for your question, Am 21.03.2013 05:22, schrieb Yifan Jiang: In addition, take my question as from a curious mind, how come you need 3 different ids for different roles :) Actually the manager role will automatically cover all the permissions of Tester and Creater.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Manual testing: Litmus or Moztrap?

2013-03-20 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Sophie, thanks for the quick answer :-) further remarks/explanations: Am 20.03.2013 14:46, schrieb Sophie Gautier: On 20/03/2013 14:09, Nino Novak wrote: Q1: Is it correct that Moztrap is ready and should be used for manual testing? Is Litmus definitively obsolete? (there are several

[Libreoffice-qa] Moztrap rights

2013-03-20 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Sophie (or whoever has Admin rights over Moztrap), long ago I created 3 users to test Moztrap, nnino nnino2 nnino3 But none of them seems to have Manager rights. Could you please re-assign rights to these users and grant them the following: nnino - Tester nnino2 - Creator nnino3 -

Re: 10,000th Bug Report!

2012-10-08 Thread Nino Novak
Am 08.10.2012 19:43 schrieb Joel Madero: I just randomly did a pull on FDO of all bugs reported under LibO and saw that we've hit the 10,000 (exactly) number. Sure? Isn't it just the maximum number of bugs bugzilla lets you export in a normal query? ;-) Nino AFAIR I counted ~14k Bugs a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 10,000th Bug Report!

2012-10-08 Thread Nino Novak
Am 08.10.2012 19:43 schrieb Joel Madero: I just randomly did a pull on FDO of all bugs reported under LibO and saw that we've hit the 10,000 (exactly) number. Sure? Isn't it just the maximum number of bugs bugzilla lets you export in a normal query? ;-) Nino AFAIR I counted ~14k Bugs a

[Libreoffice-qa] Statement draft (was: minutes of the LibreOffice QA call 2012-09-26 1300UTC)

2012-09-27 Thread Nino Novak
Am 27.09.2012 00:13 schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: - better mission statement for QA: proposals? - postponed Though postponed, I drafted a first proposal on [1]. Feel free to change it according to your *own* ideas, intentions goals, as it's up to every single QA activist to bring in his/her

Re: Triage Project Update

2012-09-04 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Joel, Am 04.09.2012 19:18 schrieb Joel Madero: I have done a complete update of the google document, this being said, if you named a sheet to your name, it's gone. Noel pointed out that a lot of the bugs on the sheet were already triaged so I just started from scratch. I'm still hoping

Re: Triage Project Update

2012-09-04 Thread Nino Novak
Am 04.09.2012 21:52 schrieb Joel Madero: Basically it would be really nice to be able to group and assign bugs the way that the document does. I think bugs are much more manageable this way and we've seen a relative spike in QA triaging activity since starting the process this way. Ok, I see:

Re: Triage Project Update

2012-09-04 Thread Nino Novak
Am 04.09.2012 23:05 schrieb Joel Madero: I agree that FDO has some benefits but the limitation is really that each user is needed to query every time, the possibility of overlap is great, and no one is really responsible for an individual bug until the query is made and someone takes the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triage Project Update

2012-09-04 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Joel, Am 04.09.2012 19:18 schrieb Joel Madero: I have done a complete update of the google document, this being said, if you named a sheet to your name, it's gone. Noel pointed out that a lot of the bugs on the sheet were already triaged so I just started from scratch. I'm still hoping

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triage Project Update

2012-09-04 Thread Nino Novak
Am 04.09.2012 21:52 schrieb Joel Madero: Basically it would be really nice to be able to group and assign bugs the way that the document does. I think bugs are much more manageable this way and we've seen a relative spike in QA triaging activity since starting the process this way. Ok, I see:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Disquieting Writer bug report -- has anybody ever faced such problems?

2012-08-23 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Roman, Am 23.08.2012 13:13 schrieb Roman Eisele: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53898 Even if we ignore all of the reporter's (IMHO completely understandable) anger, this bug report is disquieting. At least it could deserve some sorting out what could be caused by bugs

QA Mission Statement (was: Re: Fwd: Re: Closing NEEDINFO bugs)

2012-08-20 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, On 20. Aug 2012 00:56, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: [...] The first goal of the QA team is [...] nice statement :-) I had the impulse to put it in a prominent place on the QA Homepage[1]. Feel free to complete it or improve wording. Nino [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] A little confused re: QA and help from users

2012-06-19 Thread Nino Novak
Not really an answer but rather some related questions/thoughts: Am 19.06.2012 09:47, schrieb Marc Paré: Like the title says, I am a little confused over QA and help from users. Do people who are on this list participate in any QA? Don't know if I understand your question - I'd assume that

[Libreoffice-qa] Bug Lifecycle diagram (was: Re: minutes of the LibreOffice QA call 2012-05-04 14:00 UTC)

2012-05-07 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, On 07.05.2012 20:47, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi all, here are the minutes of the QA call on 2012-05-04 1400UTC. Thanks. bug wrangling (Rainer): - handling needinfo bugs Question: Do we have a bug lifecylce illustration? For not-so-trained people this can be of real help in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] voortgang issue 46250 Libre office 3.5.3

2012-05-04 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 04 May 2012, 15:42:00 Frank van Lier wrote: Dear all, I want too check the issue 46250 if it is by everybody, so it can help to solve the issue in 3.5.4??? Do you help me here to solve the issue by confirm the issue. Kind regards, Frank van Lier Frank, there's no point in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Glitch in fdo Bugzilla? (attachmend assigned to wrong account)

2012-04-25 Thread Nino Novak
On Wednesday 25 April 2012, 15:37:43 dE . wrote: File a bug, but probably this's a upstream problem. done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49139 Nino ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 test builds available

2012-04-24 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, On Tuesday 24 April 2012, 10:46:16 Petr Mladek wrote: klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v So 21. 04. 2012 v 10:49 +0200: Am 20.04.2012 12:44, schrieb Fridrich Strba: Builds are now being uploaded to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage best practice: Change or not change assignee?

2012-04-24 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Guys, can we have a decision in this matter? Do we/you need more information/ more time - or is it just different heart feelings? Shall we make an operational tradeoff by defining a test period of, say, one year? For me, the matter itself is not that important, I can arrange with both

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Glitch in fdo Bugzilla? (attachmend assigned to wrong account)

2012-04-23 Thread Nino Novak
On Monday 23 April 2012, 12:38:40 Nino Novak wrote: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48329 another similar looking phenomenon: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48509 here, 2 times the same attachment upload in comments. Nino

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] pls a look at issues 48333 and 48869

2012-04-19 Thread Nino Novak
On Thursday 19 April 2012, 22:25:05 Cor Nouws wrote: Bug 48869 - Crash when dragging selected column to the left (edit) Can't ALT+drag a column under KDE as this combo moves the whole window by default. Nino ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [TESTED] Re: 3.5.1 Online Update testing

2012-03-09 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 09 March 2012, 03:57:48 Pedro wrote: ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote Works now officially with RC2. It does indeed. But the Update message is still confusing... LibreOffice 3.5.1 RC2 is available. The installed version is LibreOffice 3.5.1. Why would someone who already

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [TESTED] Re: 3.5.1 Online Update testing

2012-03-09 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Christian, On Friday 09 March 2012, 15:17:26 Christian Lohmaier wrote: it is the server that makes the decision whether there is an update, not LibreOffice. LibreOffice just displays the server's response. ah, ok, I see! thanks for clarification ;-) Bye, Nino

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

2012-03-07 Thread Nino Novak
On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 08:42:10 Nino Novak wrote: Some ideas/wishes/comments from an interested layman: just an additional thought: is there a possibility to define certain test paths? Mean, some kind of sophisticated test case which - if passed - contains a couple of simple test cases

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

2012-03-07 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Bjoern, all, On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 12:48:25 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:42:10AM +0100, Nino Novak wrote: [test case tagging] Noted. Thanks :-) We will discuss that on the call. If time allows, fine. But on the call you should (IMHO) focus on strategic

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

2012-03-06 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 02:45:13 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: I would like to set up a LibreOffice QA call to streamline our QA efforts. I propose to make our first call on: Great! Some ideas/wishes/comments from an interested layman: structured manual testing: - oneshot populating

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-05 Thread Nino Novak
On Monday 05 March 2012, 10:41:06 Petr Mladek wrote: No, we already have a support for translating the test cases. I am sure that we will be able to do it even more cleanly in the future. Is it correct that the Litmus UI is not localized yet? (Is it localizable at all?) Is there (or will

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Thread on QA done by l10n teams

2012-03-02 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 02 March 2012, 18:26:32 Sophie Gautier wrote in libo-l10n: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg04226.html Hi Sophie, all, I'm not subscribed to the l10n list, so I'm trying to answer here. Also, I don't know about others, I just can tell what I'm doing myself: -

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Relase_Criteria wiki page change request

2012-02-17 Thread Nino Novak
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Petr Mladek wrote: Nino Novak píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 02:01 +0100: [Transclusion] Sounds wonderful! I was not aware of such feature. oh, there are still many unused wiki features left ;-) For conveniance, I've attached a patch, hopefully it works

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

2012-02-16 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Bjoern, could you provide a md5sum of the tar package? I'm on slow internet and after downloading more than 7 hours I get nino@chef:~/liboqa/Material/bibisect tar --lzma -xf bibisect-3.5.tar.lzma lzma: (stdin): File format not recognized tar: Child returned status 1 tar: Error is not

[Libreoffice-qa] Relase_Criteria wiki page change request

2012-02-15 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Petr, could you please update the ReleasePlan wiki page[1] and add onlyinclude tags around the table under Blocker Bug Nomination? I'd like to transclude the table into the German translated page so that it gets updated automatically there. (I've just tried it with a test page so it has

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

2012-02-04 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Cor, Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2012, 23:39:02 schrieb Cor Nouws: Today with my little QA presentation at FOSDEM, one person asked about how we give credits to people doing this work. Well, not structural/in a visible place, as far as I know. What about adding something here:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-29 Thread Nino Novak
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2012, 14:14:15 schrieb Luc Castermans: Op 27-01-12 16:17, Cor Nouws schreef: Hi Nino, Nino Novak wrote (27-01-12 15:09) Personally I have the impression / concern that Quality is getting one of the main challenges of LibreOffice as it seems to decrease more

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-27 Thread Nino Novak
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 00:05:48 schrieb Cor Nouws: Ideas, things to add? Personally I have the impression / concern that Quality is getting one of the main challenges of LibreOffice as it seems to decrease more and more - and software acceptance to a good deal depends on quality

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.0 QA ... from BHS 1 to BHS 2

2012-01-12 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, please keep in mind that I'm by no means a QA expert, but sometimes I'm good in expressing thoughts and fears of ordinary people ;-) On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 09:58:48 AM Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:20 +0100, Nino Novak wrote: ... So - I'd love to understand

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA-Team Web page

2012-01-05 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Rainer, Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 15:22:41 schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: I started a new QA-Team Page [2] why didn't you just update the existing page? (just wondering - so we now have two pages, and nobody will know which is the actual one?) Nino

Re: [Libreoffice] possible error in Wiki list of fixed bugs

2011-08-01 Thread Nino Novak
Am Montag, 1. August 2011, um 16:21:18 schrieb Korrawit Pruegsanusak: Hello all, On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 17:53, leif leiflod...@gmail.com wrote: But I agree that the issue number doesn't refer to the correct issue and we should ask the developer list (done) for better and more accurate

[Libreoffice] PM / was: Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.2 RC1 available

2011-07-18 Thread Nino Novak
Hi Petr, Am Montag, 18. Juli 2011, um 18:33:06 schrieben Sie: Nino Novak píše v Čt 14. 07. 2011 v 22:48 +0200: Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger: The list of fixed bugs in this release is here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.2 RC1 available

2011-07-14 Thread Nino Novak
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger: The list of fixed bugs in this release is here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffi ce-3-4-release-3.4.2.1.log for a clickable version, look at