https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
adityapratapsing...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #42 from Buovjaga ---
Code pointer was missing, so here is the dialog:
svtools/uiconfig/ui/graphicexport.ui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #41 from Dirk Munk ---
(In reply to edera from comment #40)
> Created attachment 168197 [details]
> symetrical design mockup, with %
>
> (In reply to skierpage from comment #39)
> > Well, it's for a different dialog.
>
> I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #40 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
Created attachment 168197
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168197=edit
symetrical design mockup, with %
(In reply to skierpage from comment #39)
> Well, it's for a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #39 from skierpage ---
(In reply to edera from comment #38)
> (In reply to skierpage from comment #37)
> > [...] I want to add resolution (DPI)
> > as a third way to control the displayed size of an inserted image
> But is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #38 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
(In reply to skierpage from comment #37)
> [...] I want to add resolution (DPI)
> as a third way to control the displayed size of an inserted image
Your mockup is beautiful !
But is anything missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #37 from skierpage ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #36)
> *** Bug 138765 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I reopened bug 138765. It's similar because I want to add resolution (DPI) as a
third way to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@skierpage.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #35 from Dirk Munk ---
At present exporting a writer document to a jpg file still does something
extremely annoying.
The standard resolution it gives me is 96 dpi. When I change it to 300 dpi, it
changes the size of the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #34 from Dirk Munk ---
The graphics engine of LibreOffice is not really meant for picture
manipulation, like changing ratio. I use Affinity Photo for all my picture
manipulations, and then I insert the image with the proper
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #33 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #32)
> Keep ratio? What's the use case when you don't want to keep ratio?
The question is probably about the resolution line.
For instance there are AFM
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #32 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
Keep ratio? What's the use case when you don't want to keep ratio?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #31 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #30)
> That looks pretty nice and straightforward.
Thanks !
> I guess the locked property is
> disabled as well as the vertical input when [x] keep ration is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #30 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to edera from comment #29)
> Here is a mockup for comment #21, to make it clearer.
That looks pretty nice and straightforward. I guess the locked property is
disabled as well as the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #29 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
Created attachment 160335
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=160335=edit
symetrical design mockup
Here is a mockup for comment #21, to make it clearer.
The showed use case
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #28 from Heiko Tietze ---
*** Bug 132657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #27 from Dirk Munk ---
This bug is reported on Draw, but Writer has the same problem.
Word processors like Writer work with documents made up in inch or cm / mm. So
when I design a writer document, the pages are set up in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #26 from andreas_k ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #25)
> That dialog is not suitable, because here the origin for export is a vector
> graphic. A jpg or png image already consists of a specific amount of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #25 from Regina Henschel ---
That dialog is not suitable, because here the origin for export is a vector
graphic. A jpg or png image already consists of a specific amount of pixels, a
vector graphic has no pixels at all.
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #24 from andreas_k ---
Created attachment 144664
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=144664=edit
presentation minimizer for resolution
This is the dialogue from Impress presentation minimizer (Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kain...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@home.nl
--- Comment #22
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #21 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
A symmetrical yet clear layout would be
3 groups (i.e. 3 lockers) of two numbers:
1) physical size (width, height) with a toggle to keep aspect ratio fixed
2) pixel size (width, height) with a toggle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #18)
> No... pixels have a different meaning than logical units.
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #19)
> You cannot offer pixel as length in this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #19 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #17)
> I still don't understand why we need to "lock" something. All three
> parameters are changeable, they just depend on each other.
There exists three
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #18 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #16)
> Different units are available right now via dropdown.
No... pixels have a different meaning than logical units. We can't mix them
together, or at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #17 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #13)
> I disagree with Tomaz order. I want to export so, that the png has the same
> width and height as the original vector graphic object and I want to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 142672
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=142672=edit
Mockup for the dialog
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #15)
> So please change the mockup
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #142621|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #15 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #14)
> You had the idea with the third category resp. to show all dependencies at
> FOSDEM :-).
Yes, but showing the total pixels is useless for the user.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #13)
> But I agree with Tomaz, that it would be better to have width and height for
> pixels, that is much better understandable. And for preventing to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #13 from Regina Henschel ---
I disagree with Tomaz order. I want to export so, that the png has the same
width and height as the original vector graphic object and I want to set the
DPI according the purpose of the export. I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #12 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
First of - change the "number of pixels" (as you self admitted it is
meaningless to the users) to pixel width and height as other programs do and
users are used to. Number of pixels "clever" as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #11 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10)
> <...> the new mockup has a toggle
> button that locks one of the parameters, here number of pixels.
I like this lock toggle button, its action is very
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 142621
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=142621=edit
Mockup for the dialog
Have to correct myself (the discussion with Regina and Armin was some time
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #142611|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #9 from ed...@gmx.fr ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #5)
> - There is no need for radio buttons, it should be a play between 3 values
> where you can change any of those depending on what you want to know.
That's
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #8 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> The RBs make it clear that values change depending on each other. That's the
> essence of this request.
No, the RB's do exactly the opposite. The
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #7 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
Created attachment 142619
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=142619=edit
Export as an image in Karbon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #5)
> - There is no need for radio buttons
The RBs make it clear that values change depending on each other. That's the
essence of this request.
> In almost
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #5 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
- There is no need for radio buttons, it should be a play between 3 values
where you can change any of those depending on what you want to know. In almost
all cases users only care about pixels, but
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |mentoring@documentfoundatio
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 142611
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=142611=edit
Mockup for the dialog
Hard to understand my own comments, but this mockup should make it clear. What
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
ed...@gmx.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed...@gmx.fr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||116082
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
The user expects to define the width of the output sometimes in cm but most
often as pixel. As a second step he or she wants to fine-tune the resolution
(dpi). But changing the
53 matches
Mail list logo