https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@disr.it
--- Comment #38 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
osnola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alo...@loria.fr
--- Comment #37 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gunilla.kar...@me.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@weldingengineer.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lrbru...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bitban...@earthlink.net
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #31 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Martin Srebotnjak from comment #30)
> Just FYI,
> I have the same problem also on two computers with 10.14.x (and I beleive
> even with previous OS), for more than a year, so this is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #30 from Martin Srebotnjak ---
Just FYI,
I have the same problem also on two computers with 10.14.x (and I beleive even
with previous OS), for more than a year, so this is probably not only Catalina
related.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||warrenfi...@mac.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||an...@polka.co.za
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevegli...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #26 from Christian Lohmaier ---
(In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #25)
>
> Oct 17 14:25:10 MACMINIMMO soffice[16610]: assertion failed: 19A602:
> libxpc.dylib + 86780 [2E9076CD-6C0E-38B6-8403-B2DDCE125FBF]: 0x89
I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #25 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #24)
In syslog, I also see multiple entries for :
Oct 17 14:25:10 MACMINIMMO soffice[16610]: assertion failed: 19A602:
libxpc.dylib + 86780
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisectRequest
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #24 from Christian Lohmaier ---
> Confirming and marking as regression.
not a regression IMHO as it never worked on Catalina and works just fine in
10.14 or 10.13.
> The question then is why the LO6322 app bundle is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
Priority|medium
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|LibreOffice does not launch |LibreOffice does not launch
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cl...@documentfoundation.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #22 from René de Hesselle ---
(In reply to Fred from comment #20)
> That appears to conflict with what I found.
Maybe we are misunderstanding each other. I am only talking about signature
verification, not the fact that you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #21 from MattJ ---
I updated with the "supplemental update" Apple provided today.
I downloaded and installed LibreOffice 6.3.2
I tried to start it by double clicking the icon and got the same dialog as
previously reported.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #20 from Fred ---
That appears to conflict with what I found.
1 - install LO. Fails to open, so forced with the ctrl-click "Open" option.
Now works.
2 - start Langpack UK/GB. Starts without any problems, executes, exits.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #19 from René de Hesselle ---
(In reply to Fred from comment #17)
> There seems to be a conflict between the MacOS command line tools reporting
> an OK status and the reality, which will then naturally get in the way of
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #18 from Fred ---
Just installed version: 6.3.2.2 (Build ID:
98b30e735bda24bc04ab42594c85f7fd8be07b9c) on MacOS Catalina 10.15 Beta (build
19A582a).
LO tripped the usual alerts, so manually activated.
However, the UK
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #17 from Fred ---
That was kinda the point of raising it early by some of us who had the beta
installed :)
There seems to be a conflict between the MacOS command line tools reporting an
OK status and the reality, which will
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #16 from Uwe Auer ---
Now Catalina has been released and number of reports in ask.libreoffice.org
about this issue is increasing as Catalina gets installed.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #15 from MattJ ---
I just tested this and installing a language pack did not make any difference.
I had previously remove the LibreOffice that I could not start.
I downloaded 6.3.2 from the Libreoffice site
I downloaded the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga ---
I am summarising thoughts and ideas from our release engineer.
Re: langpack: Langpack installer installs additional files to the app directory
and internally it triggers a launch and clause to trigger
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #13 from MattJ ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #12)
> Pete, Fred, MattJ:
> Did you install a language pack before launching LibreOffice first?
No I did not install a language pack before trying to launch LibreOffice.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@trimforspeed.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #11 from MattJ ---
This bug is still present in the public release of MacOS 10.15 Catalina.
Note that I get the same result if I right click on the app in /Application and
select "open"
Possibly useful information:
uname
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Fred changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #10 from Fred ---
Created attachment 154540
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154540=edit
MacOS Catalina warning window
Alas, still present.
File tested:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #8 from Alex Thurgood ---
Hmm, the switch back to XCode 9 for the release of LO631 seems not to allow for
proper notarization under Apple's new rules...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #7 from Fred ---
Created attachment 153934
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153934=edit
Screenshot of LangPack error message
Sorry, brain wasn't engaged on the main LO install, but the message is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Fred changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.2.5.1 rc |6.3.1.2 release
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Fred changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí ---
(In reply to Pete K. from comment #4)
> I confirmed that 6.3.0.1 (from the link that Xisco Faulí provided) launches
> and runs fine. When is 6.3 scheduled for general availability?
LibreOffice 6.3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #4 from Pete K. ---
I confirmed that 6.3.0.1 (from the link that Xisco Faulí provided) launches and
runs fine. When is 6.3 scheduled for general availability?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126409
--- Comment #1 from Alex Thurgood ---
@Pete : thanks for flagging this. If it hasn't been raised already on the qa
irc channel, I'll repost, and see if there's been any input from the dev
channel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
44 matches
Mail list logo
