https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #49 from bentus...@yahoo.fr ---
HI there. Thanks for your work so far. i'm just a random user who has been
bored with this limitation, and opened a similar bug report, that lead to this
one as a duplicate...
I explain my
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #48 from Dieter ---
(In reply to andis.lazdins from comment #47)
> I don't understand the comment No 43. There are no such preferences in
> Expert configuration - slide to collapse.
That's right. And therefore we have
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #47 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
I don't understand the comment No 43. There are no such preferences in Expert
configuration - slide to collapse. I would be thankful for more detailed
instructions. I'm tired from this ugly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tele...@surfxs.nl
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #45 from V Stuart Foote ---
*** Bug 141952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bentus...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #42 from Apt ---
Thanks for the reply, Heiko. Here is the new ticket I submitted:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140360
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Christian Lehmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Severity|minor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #39 from Apt ---
Stuart, thank you for the work you've done so far on the underlying issue,
which as I understand it is the incorrect width calculation for the sidebar
with UI scaling applied. If the fix for this is a ways
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #38 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
Sad to hear such absolutely non-substantiated decision. Thanks' to such
decisions it becomes very hard to tempt somebody to stay with Libreoffice.
In our company will find better use for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #36 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #33)
>
>
> The Sidebar assemblage was always intended to optimize visibility of
> controls by making use of the extra horizontal space on a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #35 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #34)
> Okay, this is evidently a different weighing of priorities. Users like the
> ones on this bug discussion list, who have less than 30" monitor size
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #34 from Christian Lehmann ---
Okay, this is evidently a different weighing of priorities. Users like the ones
on this bug discussion list, who have less than 30" monitor size and need to
work with more than one Writer window
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #33 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #32)
> ...
> However, I still miss an argument why the controls cannot be arranged in two
> rows from start, esp. if the same is acceptable on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #32 from Christian Lehmann ---
Thanks for the clarification. However, why don't you take up the argument (by
myself and quite a few users by now) that the deck has double the width that it
would need? It occupies space on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #31 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #30)
> Just for clarification: It is not a just question of reducing the size of
> the icons and their spacing a bit. The point is that, in order to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #30 from Christian Lehmann ---
Just for clarification: It is not a just question of reducing the size of the
icons and their spacing a bit. The point is that, in order to display the
styles' names, at most _half_ of the width
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #29 from Christian Lehmann ---
Ad comment 27,
"No, allowing the Sidebar Deck and its Content panels to shuffle controls--to
maintain visibility but loose context--is no solution, and would be worse UX
than the simple 'slide
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #28 from Apt ---
Thanks for the reply, Stuart. If a mitigation measure like multiple rows is not
acceptable to the designers, I do hope the incorrect width fix is not too
delayed then. At the moment this is my second biggest
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #27 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #23)
> Two considerations may be added to this design decision:
>
> 1) The same reasoning obviously has not applied to the Navigation bar, whose
> width
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #26 from Apt ---
I second Christian's suggestion of multiple rows. That seems like a very
commonsensical fix which maintains visibility of the controls while providing a
lot more flexibility in the sidebar's width.
In my
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #25 from John ---
Thank you for indicating that this was a deliberate design change, not a
regression or other bug. It looks like I will be left using 6.4 for the time
being.
While I note the discussion, it never appeared to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #24 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 167803
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167803=edit
Page sidedar - much wider than the contents
In attached picture you can see that page tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #23 from Christian Lehmann ---
Two considerations may be added to this design decision:
1) The same reasoning obviously has not applied to the Navigation bar, whose
width can be shrunk such that some controls get hidden.
2)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Writer sidebar minimum |Writer sidebar minimum
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Writer sidebar minimum |Writer sidebar minimum
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #21 from John ---
Just to confirm that I see the same problem in all windows versions of 7.x up
to and including 7.1.0 beta 1. The waste of space is considerable on small
screens. When using styles, which I know well, I only
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #20 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
Still the same situation with 7.1 beta and 7.0.4.1. Is there any way I can help
to get rid of this problem without programming skills?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #19 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
The regression of non-reducible sidebar is not yet solved in 7.0.3.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #18 from Christian Lehmann ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #16)
> Understand this as a Windows bug since the sidebar width is okay on Linux.
>
> As a general comment, the design team discussed the topic. The
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andis.lazd...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze ---
Understand this as a Windows bug since the sidebar width is okay on Linux.
As a general comment, the design team discussed the topic. The initial width of
the sidebar should be defined by the deck
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caol...@redhat.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christianw_lehm...@arcor.de
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #13 from natedhee...@gmail.com ---
I am also experiencing this issue of excessive minimum width of the sidebar. I
like to have the navigator open at all times and document zoom at 120%, but the
sidebar's width overlaps with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Simon Garrett from comment #11)
> Sorry, to be clear:
>
> It seems to occur when WINDOWS text scaling is greater than 100% (not
> scaling in LibreOffice).
Yes but that is bug 128243
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #11 from Simon Garrett ---
Sorry, to be clear:
It seems to occur when WINDOWS text scaling is greater than 100% (not scaling
in LibreOffice).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #10 from Simon Garrett ---
This problem is definitely reproducable (v7.0.0.3, Windows 10 64-bit, 2004
build).
It seems to occur when text scaling is greater than 100%. The greater the
scaling above 100%, the greater the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote ---
> was concerned with in bug 131097
s/131097/bug 130197
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #7)
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130197 wanted to set
> writer sidebar to ~about all the same width, the table panel is approx 10
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #7 from Caolán McNamara ---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130197 wanted to set writer
sidebar to ~about all the same width, the table panel is approx 10 toolbar
buttons wide so this pane is also set to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103459
See
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caol...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #4 from Timur ---
Created attachment 159396
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=159396=edit
sidebar compared 6.4 7.0+
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Linux (All)
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|sidebar minimum width is|Writer sidebar minimum
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
63 matches
Mail list logo
