https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #57 from Telesto ---
@Mike
Is it not possible to get some kind of unit test for png export;
Kohei did point this out: sheet 26
https://www.slideshare.net/kohei101/life-after-calc-core-change
The whole approach is currently a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
mwtjunkm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
St
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #56 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
I don't consider this bug "resolved" because the fix leaves crap behind on the
PNG output, meaning the output is just as useless as it was before, but I'll
log a "new" bug reflecting that this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #55 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #53)
> So while I cannot use the output because the fix leaves artifacts behind,
> you want that to be a new bug? The output is still very much unusable.
Bug tr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #54 from Telesto ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #53)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #51)
> > (In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #43)
> > > Getting close but we're not there yet. With Skia rendering, ..
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #53 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #51)
> (In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #43)
> > Getting close but we're not there yet. With Skia rendering, ...
>
> No that doesn't work like tha
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #52 from Telesto ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #44)
> Created attachment 164433 [details]
> Expectation of PNG output with a transparent object
>
> This is a screen shot of an LO document. There are no borders set
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #51 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #43)
> Getting close but we're not there yet. With Skia rendering, ...
No that doesn't work like that. This bug is about Skia-independent problem with
export of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #50 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #47)
> And the is what came from the link off of the Help, About
> window, so apparently that's broken too.
That is bug 135133, meanwhile correct MD5 hash sig
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #48 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
And the is what came from the link off of the Help, About
window, so apparently that's broken too.(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment
#45)
> Created attachment 164434 [details]
> PNG export
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #49 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
And the is what came from the link off of the Help, About
window, so apparently that's broken too.(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment
#45)
> Created attachment 164434 [details]
> PNG export
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #47 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
And the is what came from the link off of the Help, About
window, so apparently that's broken too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #46 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Forgot the version information. Tested 2020.08.18 with
Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID:
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 20190; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #45 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 164434
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=164434&action=edit
PNG export result with skia rendering
This is the output of using Skia rendering with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #44 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 164433
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=164433&action=edit
Expectation of PNG output with a transparent object
This is a screen shot of an LO doc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #43 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Getting close but we're not there yet. With Skia rendering, there is a
white/gray outline around a transparent box on the PNG export where there is no
border defined at all in the drawing docu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #42 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #41)
Of course - it's been several days since then.
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #41 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #40)
> I believe it's fixed by
> https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/
> bf021c369f2306ee507da9bd3cc4cd10ac5d234c
Has this hit the daily builds then
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #40 from Mike Kaganski ---
I believe it's fixed by
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/bf021c369f2306ee507da9bd3cc4cd10ac5d234c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Petr Valach changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petr.val...@libreoffice.org
--- Co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Robert Großkopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob...@familiegrosskopf.de
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||134906
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #37 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #36)
> I will not
> revert it on master, because I do not know, which problem Mike Kaganski
> wants to solve with that commit.
Please check soft edge effect
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #36 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #35)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #34)
> > (In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #33)
> >
> > > The latest fix on the July 12 daily build still
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #35 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #34)
> (In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #33)
>
> > The latest fix on the July 12 daily build still is not working for me.
>
> What fix do you m
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #34 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #33)
> The latest fix on the July 12 daily build still is not working for me.
What fix do you mean? I see no fix that is related to this bug.
--
You are re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #33 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 162922
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162922&action=edit
LO Draw comparison test 2020.07.12
First, thank you for your attention on this bug.
T
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #32 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #19)
>
> Bisected to:
> authorMike Kaganski 2020-05-28
> 20:13:50 +0200
> committer Mike Kaganski 2020-05-29
> 10:31:40
> +0200
> commit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #30 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
This bug kills. I wish I knew how to program LO. Is there anyway to get this
elevated?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #29 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Perhaps this may help --
transparent elements imported from other graphics programs (I used paint.net)
render just fine (I only tried with hardware rendering), even when the
transparent elem
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #28 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Still an issue with this
Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 9bef09cb2f0c9c9e6819f28ed8e83c0edd6eadb6
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 20152; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Local
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #27 from Telesto ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #25)
> I should have said the overall image in 162447 is blanched, but the reason
> is the same.
No need for some many examples :-) First is obvious enough.
The font
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #26 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
I've just discovered something:
In Microsoft Windows, the default photo viewing program depicts the image with
the transparent object on it as dimmer than the original.
In my Firefox browser
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #25 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
I should have said the overall image in 162447 is blanched, but the reason is
the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #24 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 162447
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162447&action=edit
inappropriate appearance of exported PNG image
This is not what an LO PNG export shoul
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #23 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 162446
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162446&action=edit
expected appearance of exported PNG image
This is what I expect any PNG export to look
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #22 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 162445
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162445&action=edit
LO ODG side-by-side transparency bug comparison
LO ODG file containing two identical s
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #21 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
The loss of detail that I mentioned when a transparent element is placed over a
picture is a real phenomenon.
I created a new template and used layers to use for transparent objects. One LO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #19 from Telesto ---
Created attachment 162440
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162440&action=edit
Bibisect log
Bisected to:
author Mike Kaganski 2020-05-28 20:13:50
+0200
committer Mike
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
--
You are recei
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #18 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #17)
> That's confusing, because the two images in the side-by-side example are
> identical in size, and in the same document just different slides, so sorry
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #17 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
That's confusing, because the two images in the side-by-side example are
identical in size, and in the same document just different slides, so sorry for
me being dense, but I'm not understandi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #15)
> https://i.imgur.com/JpyvCYG.png is a side-by-side comparison of the original
> non-transparent image next to me cutting up the image (on a new slide
> be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #15 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
https://i.imgur.com/JpyvCYG.png is a side-by-side comparison of the original
non-transparent image next to me cutting up the image (on a new slide because I
had no idea how to move layers abov
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #14 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 162438
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162438&action=edit
7.0.0b2 export to PNG with a new transparent layer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 162437
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162437&action=edit
riff on the sample document with textual elements moved into a new Draw layer,
and layers Z-o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #12 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8)
> Can't tell if this is intentional. But confirm export to PNG of transparent
> Draw shapes changed from 6.4 -> 7.0
>
> If intentional need docume
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #11 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
This is what I mean about the text not necessarily being placed within the gray
box, i.e., why the text is its own object and not an object with its area black
with a transparency applied:
ht
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #10 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #9)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7)
> > why are you not placing the cover text
> > with transparency into a layer of its own?
>
>
> The
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
--- Comment #9 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7)
> why are you not placing the cover text
> with transparency into a layer of its own?
The position of the gray box is not always going to be 1:1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134213
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisectRequest, regression
58 matches
Mail list logo