[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 dolez...@cvut.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |dolez...@cvut.cz

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #39 from dolez...@cvut.cz --- This is way overdue for fixing. Currently most reasonable solution seems to be: add a flag to specify new NBSP behaviour is to be used, and for documents that have it interpret NBSP as a

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #38 from Ultimate Apparels --- It's not only with technical text or numbers where non-breaking spaces are useful. https://bit.ly/3lsU5Vz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #37 from Maciej Kotliński --- Everybody understand that the compatibility should be preserved. Unfortunately most of texts in Polish, Czech and probably some other languages looks ugly... very ugly. I know that other word

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 gawkla changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaw...@gmail.com --- Comment #36 from

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 Leroy changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||129434 Referenced Bugs:

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|129434 | Referenced Bugs:

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 László Németh changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||129434 CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #35 from Shriramana Sharma --- I would be happy with a per-document option for how to treat NBSP-s, but the default behaviour for new documents should be configured where? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #34 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to dohnp5a1 from comment #33) > At first introduce incompatibility by breaking unknown number of millions of > existing documents of our users, to allow *some other* users to do what they

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #33 from dohnp...@gmail.com --- At first set the default behaviour of LO strictly according the Unicode definitions – it is about time after 8 years (!). As a supplement later there could be some extension with more features

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #32 from Mike Kaganski --- Unicode has that "non-breaking" property only set to some of its different spaces. But in reality, different typographic rules of countries/bodies/times, as noted, may require full repertoire of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #31 from rysson --- Yes, yes, yes! This bug was reported in 2010. Please, I think it's time to fix it. I know I still can use LaTeX or pure HTML to write documents. But using LibreOffice for

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #30 from Shriramana Sharma --- The Unicode standard document http://unicode.org/reports/tr14/ clearly states that: When expanding or compressing interword space according to common typographical practice,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #29 from Jan --- Dear friends, If I have understood the discussion well, the compatibility with standards and other software is a problem. But if we limit the solution to two cases: - printing

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #28 from brecha...@gmail.com --- I managed to work around it! Now I can do book-publishing in LibreOffice in the Slovak language. I use the U+2060 (WORD JOINER [WJ]) character for a non-breakable relative-width space. Does it

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #27 from vhais...@gmail.com --- Microsoft does what Microsoft does. I can tell you as native Czech language speaker and writer that the fixed size of the /U+0160 characters is contrary to Czech typography.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #26 from rysson --- > It stopped commiting to modern standards for whatever reasson (probably the > whining of long‐term users). Yeah. But it's not good reason to stop fixing it in

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #25 from Fimicjus --- (In reply to rysson from comment #22) > Hi. > Web browsers use U+00A0 as non-breaking not-fixed-width space too. > Also MS Office changed the behavior: > > With the introduction of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 brecha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brecha...@gmail.com ---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #23 from vhais...@gmail.com --- This is biting me as well. It makes Libreoffice Writer basically unusable for any serious Czech language text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #22 from rysson --- Hi. Web browsers use U+00A0 as non-breaking not-fixed-width space too. Also MS Office changed the behavior: With the introduction of Word 2013, MS changed the behaviour of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #21 from Zenaan Harkness --- Anecdote from a 100-year old legal book in Australia (our "Annotated Constitution"): - nbsp between name components such as "Mr. Smith" contain a narrow non-breaking space -

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #20 from jkl --- (In reply to dohnp5a1 from comment #0) > Created attachment 52184 [details] > The preposition “s” may not stand in the end of line in Czech, thus no-break > space is used after that It's

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #19 from Stanislav Horacek --- Created attachment 122957 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=122957=edit non breaking space interpreted as fixed width space Yes, this

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] "NO-BREAK SPACE" (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #18 from Chris Sherlock --- Question: is this occurring in .ODT *and* .DOCX files? And chance of uploading a test document? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #16 from QA Administrators qa-ad...@libreoffice.org --- ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #17 from dohnp...@gmail.com --- The bug is still present in LibreOffice 4.4.4.3, on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, its behavior did not undergo any changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 Simo Kaupinmäki isoku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||46770 -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 dohnp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|Other |All Severity|enhancement

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #15 from Roman Eisele b...@eikota.de --- (In reply to comment #5) Jan_J (bug 49674 comment 2) proposed to use the Unicode word joiner U+2060 with a normal space to get a non-fixed-width non-breakable space. But U+2060 is a zero

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #14 from Roman Eisele b...@eikota.de --- (In reply to comment #13) We all more or less seem to agree that the rendering of U+00A0 as a fixed-width space is basically a bug. Yes. But a special kind of bug: a bug which has been

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #13 from Simo Kaupinmäki isoku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #12) We all more or less seem to agree that the rendering of U+00A0 as a fixed-width space is basically a bug. Therefore it is a somewhat perverted situation that

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #11 from stfhell stfh...@googlemail.com --- (re Comment #10) I don't think it makes much sense to discuss the merits of various spaces or typography issues, Simo, especially on LO Bugzilla. The characters exist, people can use them,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #12 from stfhell stfh...@googlemail.com --- (In reply to comment #10) Using the Unicode fixed-width spaces for manual justifying in digital typesetting would be awkward and anachronistic. I consider a good support for Unicode

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #10 from Simo Kaupinmäki isoku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #9) I can direct you to the orthographic German Duden (following DIN 5008 for letter-writing): With office documents and e-mails use a space after abbreviation

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #9 from stfhell stfh...@googlemail.com --- (In reply to comment #7) It is easy to agree with Stfhell's notion that the intervening space in expressions such as Dr Freud and 5 % should be non-breaking, but I can't quite see the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 --- Comment #8 from Simo Kaupinmäki isoku...@gmail.com --- Oh, the two dictionary links included in my previous comment should incorporate the final period, which apparently has been interpreted as sentence-ending punctuation by the Bugzilla

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 Simo Kaupinmäki isoku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||isoku...@gmail.com

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 stfhell stfh...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stfh...@googlemail.com

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41652] NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0) interpreted as fixed-width space

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652 Roman Eisele b...@eikota.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement --- Comment #6