Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi Pedro, Le 25/11/2015 16:16, Pedro a écrit : > Hi Joel > > > jmadero wrote >>> A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other year? >>> Example: let's say 5.1 is dedicated to fixes. Then a slight change of >>> schedule would postpone 5.2.0 to some months later so that most

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice releases (was: Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday)

Hi Bjoern Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:40:37AM -0700, Pedro wrote: >> A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other year? >> Example: let's say 5.1 is dedicated to fixes. Then a slight change of >> schedule would postpone 5.2.0 to some months later

[Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice releases (was: Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday)

Hi, On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:40:37AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other year? > Example: let's say 5.1 is dedicated to fixes. Then a slight change of > schedule would postpone 5.2.0 to some months later so that most devs would > concentrate

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi Joel jmadero wrote >> A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other year? >> Example: let's say 5.1 is dedicated to fixes. Then a slight change of >> schedule would postpone 5.2.0 to some months later so that most devs >> would >> concentrate on 5.1 (of course new

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice releases (was: Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday)

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > That wouldnt help at all, "delaying the release" is just another name for > "not > making an release from master for a longer period of time" and thus would > result in _more_ regressions, not less. Let's see: If releases are slowed down there are more regressions, if

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice releases

> > Maybe my suggestion wasn't clear. I know about the "twice a year" release > branches. My suggestion was exactly to delay the second release of the year > so that developers could have more time to dedicate to a single branch (of > course they could always submit new features to the Master

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi All, > BTW would be nice listen from the candidates their opinion about concrete > matters like this one. Should have suggested. If you're really interested in knowing candidates views on specific items you may want to email [board-discuss] list :) Warmest Regards, Joel

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi There, On 11/25/2015 02:04 PM, m.a.riosv wrote: > BTW would be nice listen from the candidates their opinion about concrete > matters like this one. I would be surprised if there was any deviation for any of the candidates - we've discussed this at length on the Board. Hell I just brought it

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice releases (was: Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday)

Hi, On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > Maybe my suggestion wasn't clear. I know about the "twice a year" release > branches. My suggestion was exactly to delay the second release of the year > so that developers could have more time to dedicate to a single branch (of >

[Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of the Design Hangout: 2015-11-18

[the meeting on 11th was cancelled] * Present: Cor, Heiko, Kendy, Samuel * UI changes integrated the last two weeks: + form-related controls ta insert and tools menu (Jay) + hierarchical organization of slide transitions (Tor) + and new slide transitions (Tor, Tomaž) +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi Pedro, Thanks for bringing this matter again at discussion, even some people is bored of it. Excuse is always on developers, but I have not appreciated such attitude at least with significant devs, even always there is some exception. There is not a QA work flow for the whole. The results

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi Robinson, Robinson Tryon píše v St 25. 11. 2015 v 16:03 -0500: > It looks like the rename script got greedy and erroneously modified an > ODT (sw/qa/complex/writer/testdocuments/TESTXMLID.odt): > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=49c2b9808df8a6b197dec666dfc0cda6321a4306

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> * Further renaming in sw (Kendy/Miklos) >> + Kendy would again update the script so that Cloph can run it before >> the branch-off >> + script lives in: bin/rename-sw-abbreviations.sh > > I've pushed several

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi Robinson Robinson Tryon wrote >> Isn't 16% of Regressions something that TDF should be worried about? >> >> (713 out of 4419 open bugs, according to >> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-of-ESC-call-2015-11-19-tp4166818.html) > > I definitely would like to see that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi Joel jmadero wrote > That's unfortunate, we should talk about moving the time and/or finding > some other way to get dedicated people like yourself on live chat during > meeting. If the meeting could be one hour and a half later (14:30 UTC) I could make it, but that is probably too late for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

Hi, Le 25/11/2015 12:52, Pedro a écrit : > Hi Joel > > > jmadero wrote >> That's unfortunate, we should talk about moving the time and/or finding >> some other way to get dedicated people like yourself on live chat during >> meeting. > > If the meeting could be one hour and a half later (14:30

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: QA Meeting on Wednesday

On 11/25/2015 02:40 AM, Pedro wrote: > > > > Now that Collabora has a paid version (by the UK government) which is a 3 > year LTS some of these bugs might start to be squashed and contributed back > to the Master branch... > > A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other