Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

I quite often do bibisect, most often from the daily dbgutil repository for Linux, but going to older versions as needed. I have, just for the fun of it, cloned the Windows bibisect repository, and it seems to be good; however it covers such a narrow range of commits that I seldom think of using

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

jmadero wrote > On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote: >> What he was trying to find imho is a compromise between what is needed >> for QA and for users. Of course, the more granularity the better, but I >> think also that a long list of version is confusing. I think the problem here is that a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

On 12/01/2015 03:19 PM, Pedro wrote: > jmadero wrote >> On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote: >>> What he was trying to find imho is a compromise between what is needed >>> for QA and for users. Of course, the more granularity the better, but I >>> think also that a long list of version is

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

jmadero wrote >> LibreOffice/TDF absolutely needs a user friendly Bug Submission Assistant >> where users can report bugs they found in the stable releases of the live >> branches (currently 4.4, 5.0 and 5.1). This would reduce the list to less >> than 15 options... > So . . . I think this is a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote: > Hi Joel, > Le 01/12/2015 17:53, Joel Madero a écrit : >> >> > Tommy's proposal was to simplify BZ approach on a user point of view. It > is intimidating to go further when you're not sure what version you are > using, and RC, beta are not clear things for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

On 12/01/2015 08:52 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > I don't bibisect - one of the reasons being that last time I tried, > bibisecting on OSX required one to go through the pain of Gatekeeper > every *** time you start LO (08:57:21 AM) shm_get_: *jmadero 1/ you can turn off gatekeeper while

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote: > Hi Joel > > > jmadero wrote >>> If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and >>> 4.0.1, >>> a bibisect in that range should be able to find the problematic >>> commit/patch? >>> What would be the advantage to have the user install

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote: > No, I never tried bibisect on Windows. But Sophie volunteered to give me a > hand if I decided to try so I assume it is possible. > > Again, what would be the advantage to have the user install 4.0.0 Beta1, > Beta2, RC1, etc? Reducing the search range to a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Le 01/12/2015 15:56, Sophie a écrit : Hi Sophie, > Hi all, > > I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is > bibisecting on a regular basis? > You can either answer on the list or directly to me if you prefer. > Thanks a lot in advance for your feedback I try and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

Hi Joel, Le 01/12/2015 17:53, Joel Madero a écrit : > > > On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote: >> No, I never tried bibisect on Windows. But Sophie volunteered to give me a >> hand if I decided to try so I assume it is possible. >> >> Again, what would be the advantage to have the user install

[Libreoffice-qa] QA meeting tomorrow?

Hi all, Is there a QA meeting planed tomorrow and at what time will it be? Thanks! Cheers Sophie -- Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org GSM: +33683901545 IRC: sophi Co-founder - Release coordinator The Document Foundation ___ List

[Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice 5.0.4 RC1 test builds available

Hello all, For the upcoming version 5.0.4 the builds for RC1 are now available on pre-releases. It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update a previous version of LibreOffice on Windows. Linux and Mac users can install alongside LibreOffice 4.4 For the complete schedule.,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

Hi Joel, On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > > > On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote: >> Hi Joel >> >> >> jmadero wrote If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and 4.0.1, a bibisect in that range should be able to

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 5.1.0 beta1 test builds available

Hi *, for the upcoming new version 5.1.0, the builds for beta1 are now available on pre-releases. 5.1.0 is scheduled to be released beginning of February While the build is made available in all supported languages and translation templates were updated, translations may still be incomplete.

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.4.7 rc2 test builds available

Hi *, for the upcoming new version 4.4.7 the builds for RC2 are now available on pre-releases. It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update a previous version of LibreOffice on Windows. Linux and Mac users can install alongside LibreOffice 5.0 See

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

On 12/01/2015 10:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > 5.0.0.3 and 5.0.0.4 beta2: 42 > between rc3 and rc4 > > As long as the merge-to-one-version indicates what version was set > prior to the unification, I don't see the information loss, but it > should be a standardized comment, so that you

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice 5.0.4 RC1 test builds available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christian, > > For the upcoming version 5.0.4 the builds for RC1 are now available > on pre-releases. > > It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update > a previous version of LibreOffice on Windows. Linux and Mac users >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

> > I will gladly work on such a proposal. However the bugzilla modifications > were not my idea, they were from Tommy. I just said I agreed that there are > too many versions. In any case I don't see how my opinion can affect the > current policies. I'm just a user, I'm not even a QA member.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA meeting tomorrow?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Sophie wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a QA meeting planed tomorrow and at what time will it be? Hi Sophie, Yes, there'll be a QA Meeting tomorrow. Agenda/Pending Action Items here:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup

Hi Joel jmadero wrote >> If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and >> 4.0.1, >> a bibisect in that range should be able to find the problematic >> commit/patch? >> What would be the advantage to have the user install 4.0.0 Beta1, Beta2, >> RC1, etc? > > Bibisect is

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Hi Sophie, В письме от 1 декабря 2015 15:56:35 пользователь Sophie написал: > I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is > bibisecting on a regular basis? I build LO about one or two times a week. But I do not bibisect. Best regards, Lera

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Sophi, * Build on Linux but only when patching. Routinely bisect against my archive of daily pulls of Windows TBs. I don't run a bibisect git repo (though I probably should invest in setting up the Windows flavor since we seem short there). Stuart -- View this message in context:

[Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Hi all, I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is bibisecting on a regular basis? You can either answer on the list or directly to me if you prefer. Thanks a lot in advance for your feedback Cheers Sophie -- Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org GSM: