[Libreoffice-qa] Bug-Reporting: Needinfo sets confimed to 1
Hello *, could be I understand this wrong. But in the last months there are many people setting bugs to NEEDINFO which are UNCONFIRMED. So I get the feedback from bugzilla Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1 The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the bug-reporter. But with setting it to NEEDINFO (There is asked for a better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed. Example: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72391 How do we handle NEEDINFO? Regards Robert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug-Reporting: Needinfo sets confimed to 1
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Robert Großkopf rob...@familiegrosskopf.de wrote: Hello *, could be I understand this wrong. But in the last months there are many people setting bugs to NEEDINFO which are UNCONFIRMED. So I get the feedback from bugzilla Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1 The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the bug-reporter. But with setting it to NEEDINFO (There is asked for a better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed. well that is weird! Example: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72391 How do we handle NEEDINFO? Probably we hit it* with a big stick until it doesn't automatically set this 'ever-confirmed' flag. Either that, or we figure out a different way to indicate that we want information from the OP or from one of the other commenters/cc'd individuals on the bug. That might require some investment of implementation time... But (as always), this will all need to wait until after we finish the migration. Cheers, --R * i.e. the code ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug-Reporting: Needinfo sets confimed to 1
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Robert Großkopf rob...@familiegrosskopf.de wrote: could be I understand this wrong. But in the last months there are many people setting bugs to NEEDINFO which are UNCONFIRMED. So I get the feedback from bugzilla Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1 The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the bug-reporter. But with setting it to NEEDINFO (There is asked for a better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed. Interestingly, if/once the bug is set back to 'UNCONFIRMED', that flag is cleared. It's not (as many of us probably assumed) a write-once-never-change field. See an example in the activity here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_activity.cgi?id=72402 So while I question the logic of setting it at all when the status changes to NEEDINFO, at least bugzilla is cleaning it back up if/when we move status back to UNCONFIRMED. --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... I have missed ESC of nov 21st (my fault), but 'the guys doing the work should choose' is not 'the guys doing the work should organize a beauty pageant election' On the dev side we are not used to 'vote'. decisions are usually just taken. When there is some controversy, the interested parties expose the merit of their respective positions, explaining the rational for their choice (and I mean _rational_ not _feelings_). That usually lead to either a compromise to address each other points, or the parties rallying around the rational of one side (we all have 'opinions' on anything when asked... but more often than not we do not _care_ that much about a given topic, so unless we have a strong argument to offer we usually do not demand that our opinions be counted as strongly as the one of the people intimately involved with the work and problems associated with it.. iow 'pick your battle wisely' :-) )), or more often a combination of both. in 3 years we where driven to a vote only once.. and even then that was more to have each position 'on the record'. So in that light I would point out again the criteria _I_ think are relevant for the name here: 1/ short. the summary commit message is the 1st line of a commit message, and is limited to 80 chars (72 preferred), and when a commit refer to a bug we want the bug reference in that message. 2/ obvious meaning and easy to remember and type, as much as possible. The opposition I've seen so far to lo# are centered around 'it can be confused with the abbreviation of the product'. I think that is a feature not a bug. in the context of bugzilla the use will always be lo#number the # make it clear that it is a bug number and remove any ambiguity... furtheremore these _are_ libreoffice bugs.. lo = libreoffice, # = bug here. So, other abbreviation may have merit, and may prevails, but discarding lo# for that reason seems a red herring to me. for reference a quick grep of the log message give use the following uses: fdo# deb# n#n #inn# rhbz#nn CID#n cp# bnc# abi# i# #n# lp#n and a mix bag of some mistyped variations thereof (like #fdo) Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Git error with bibisect40
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Ken Biondi kenbio...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello all, While attempting bibisect I got the following error: ken@ubuntu:/media/LACIE/LO-Bibisect/Bibi4/bibisect40$ git checkout oldest error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout: opt/CREDITS.odt opt/LICENSE.odt . . . opt/program/libodbclo.so opt/pr Aborting Any ideas on how to fix this? I tried git reset --hard to no avail. git clean -fd git reset --hard should do the trick Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
Hi Noel, On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:32 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: On 2013-12-05 19:23, Michael Meeks wrote: + attach a callgrind profile for 'expert config' to bug (Kendy) [ could make it experimental later if necessary ] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72125 I've pushed a small cleanup related to this code to gerrit: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6956 Hey - that's cool =) thanks so much for caring about this. From what I recall of trying to make that thing scale text measuring of every row is almost as silly as creating an a11y peer for every row cell ;-) The gtk+ approach is to have a flag that assumes homogenous row heights which makes everything massively faster. I added a pointer in the bug. It's great to have some attention there ! :-) Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:31:53 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com a écrit: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mat M m...@gmx.fr wrote: You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists, then you'd been more votes. What are the 'concerned lists'? i10n? projects? website? Lots of people interact with the bugtracker, chief among them, the QA team. Well, I second on Norbert thoughts, and I was just saying, that, if you go for a vote, an announcement to the whole bunch of lists might have brought people in, like enlightning Norbert's views. For me, the abbreviation is just one small part of the bigger Bugzilla migration plan: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal The reason we're having a vote now is because Nov 8 - I mentioned abbreviation in the proposal Nov 10/11 - Discussed abbrevs on the QA list Nov 18 - QA Meeting decided to ask ESC for input Nov 21 - ESC offered suggestions; said the guys doing the work should choose. Nov 21 - Looked for consensus on QA list Dec 1 - Saw no consensus; Moving to vote on the QA list I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. You worked hard, and that was appreciated, don't misunderstand me. But if you don't find a consensus on the QA list, you might ask for wider audience, so my remark. Not a critic in any way. You did your best and we ackowledge that. FWIW, I also appreciate all the bug metrics and follow-up QA provides, it is very nice and useful. Well, if you want to mimic fdo, abbrev should be loo (libreoffice.org instead of freedesktop.org) loo is a good trade-off : more than 2, but less than 4; different of the standard lo we use to shortcut LibreOffice IIRC, in en-GB 'loo' == toilet Well, I didn't check and that was more of a friday's troll than a real proposal. (not that there aren't any piss-poor bug reports in FDO right now...) ;-) BTW, I vote also for lo# ok -- vote recorded. If the devs really want lo#, just send in enough people to vote and the outcome will be certain. --R brace yourselves, lo# is coming Mat --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice BSA
I have done some updated to the BSA fork I have on my Github. Can any one check whether it's working properly and any problems he may have since I'm not really experienced with JQuery? Any feedback, please send it to me. Sincerely, Jean Spiteri. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi Rob and All, it is not easy understand what is happening. We are voting after a right process to do it. As Robinson wrote: The reason we're having a vote now is because Nov 8 - I mentioned abbreviation in the proposal Nov 10/11 - Discussed abbrevs on the QA list Nov 18 - QA Meeting decided to ask ESC for input Nov 21 - ESC offered suggestions; said the guys doing the work should choose. Nov 21 - Looked for consensus on QA list Dec 1 - Saw no consensus; Moving to vote on the QA list I think everyone in the project can vote here if they want. IMHO, we need to finish the voting process, and communicate the results. If some in the project are not agree, it's fine, they can report to the ESC their reflections and inform their proposal. In last term The Board can take a decision about what better fits for all in the project. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugzilla-Migration-Abbreviation-to-replace-fdo-12345-tp4084355p4087058.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Character Line Break set to 0 in Tools - Options - Language Settings - Writing Aids?
Hi Thomas when I open Tools – Options – Writing Aids, and scroll down the Options part, I see the entry Characters before line break: 0 . A doubleclick on it shows a 2 instead. Is this only on my system, or can someone confirm it? You meant Tools Options Language Settings Writing Aids ;) I can confirm the same error under Windows XP Pro x86 Sp3 en_US using 4.2 Beta2 If you click on Characters before line break: 0 and then click on the Edit button you also get the Hyphenation dialog with Characters before break: 2 Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Character-Line-Break-set-to-0-in-Tools-Options-Language-Settings-Writing-Aids-tp4087004p4087066.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: FreedomSponsors, LibreOffice and Bugzilla
I like the idea. Samuel Am 05.12.2013 17:13, schrieb Sophie: Hi all, I'm fowarding a mail from FreedomSponsors asking about an add on our bugzilla system that links to FreedomSponsors site which is a crouwndfounding plateform. That means that some bugs could be crowdfounded for their fix (and it seems it already happened for a LibreOffice bug). I let you discuss if you're interested or not and will inform Tony of our decision. Thanks ! Cheers Sophie Original Message Subject:FreedomSponsors, LibreOffice and Bugzilla Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:33:22 -0200 From: Tony França tonylamp...@gmail.com To: i...@documentfoundation.org Hi, my name is Tony, I'm the founder of freedomsponsors.org http://freedomsponsors.org - a crowdfunding website for Free/Open Source Software projects. In case you never heard of it yet, here's a brief explanation: FreedomSponsors is a crowdfunding platform for Free and Open Source projects. Specifically, open source project's _issues_. It lets anyone place money bounties for open issues that they are interested, for which payment is required only after the issue is resolved. If the sponsors are happy with the solution, they pay it directly to the developer. We believe our site can help the Free Software cause and bring more people closer to the developers' communities. That's the short story. The long story is here [1] http://freedomsponsors.org/faq. LibreOffice is driving a decent traction on FreedomSponsors [2] http://freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/?page=1project_id=149s=project_name=LibreOffice/[3] http://blog.freedomsponsors.org/wine-support-for-libreoffice/, and I think that's pretty awesome. We have developed a plugin for Bugzilla [4] https://github.com/freedomsponsors/freedomsponsors-bugzilla-plugin, that when installed, will add a nice, discrete Sponsor this link on Bugzilla's bug pages, just below the Importance bit. Just to illustrate, here's an example of a similar plugin on Jenkins JIRA - [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13000. I'm hoping that LibreOffice will consider adopting it. Do you think that's a good idea? If you need anything from FreedomSponsors, just let me know. :-) Cheers! Tony [1] - http://freedomsponsors.org/faq [2] - http://freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/?page=1project_id=149s=project_name=LibreOffice [3] - http://blog.freedomsponsors.org/wine-support-for-libreoffice/ [4] - https://github.com/freedomsponsors/freedomsponsors-bugzilla-plugin [5] - https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13000 ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug-Reporting: Needinfo sets confimed to 1
Robinson Tryon wrote Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1 The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the bug-reporter. But with setting it to NEEDINFO (There is asked for a better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed. well that is weird! Hi! This is Bugzilla's default code. Moving an unconfirmed bug to an open state that isn't UNCONFIRMED will confirm the bug. Moving a confirmed bug to UNCONFIRMED will change everconfirmed. It is used internally for checking who can confirm bugs (has canconfirm permission) or by voting extension (confirming by popular vote). Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bug-Reporting-Needinfo-sets-confimed-to-1-tp4087006p4087091.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels... Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... I have missed ESC of nov 21st (my fault), but 'the guys doing the work should choose' is not 'the guys doing the work should organize a beauty pageant election' IMHO 'the guys doing the work should choose' means 'we're going to leave it up to the best judgment of those people to decide'. I thought that we had a bunch of okay abbreviations, and aside from tdf# (which I wanted to reserve for future use), all of the other names seemed good enough to me, and didn't raise any red flags when I checked-in with the ESC. So, with that information in hand, I figured that I would ask for input from QA, first in the form of searching for consensus, and second (if need be) as a voting process. QA doesn't get to make decisions like this very often, so I thought it would be something fun for us to decide as a team. Alternatively, if we want to interpret this message as ' *only* the guys doing the work should choose', then that's fine with me, too. By my reckoning, that list includes - Cloph (for fixing bots and websites, creating DNS redirects, and generally putting up with all of my requests) - Dennis Roczek (for a bunch of detailed bot work translating urls on the wiki) - Andras Timar (for updating urls in the translations and core git repos) - Tollef (Doing all of the work on the FDO end) - Me (for doing a lot of legwork on the migration) - Some others I've undoubtedly forgotten On the dev side we are not used to 'vote'. decisions are usually just taken. When there is some controversy, the interested parties expose the merit of their respective positions, explaining the rational for their choice (and I mean _rational_ not _feelings_). ok That usually lead to either a compromise to address each other points, or the parties rallying around the rational of one side (we all have 'opinions' on anything when asked... but more often than not we do not _care_ that much about a given topic, so unless we have a strong argument to offer we usually do not demand that our opinions be counted as strongly as the one of the people intimately involved with the work and problems associated with it.. iow 'pick your battle wisely' :-) )), or more often a combination of both. in 3 years we where driven to a vote only once.. and even then that was more to have each position 'on the record'. ok So in that light I would point out again the criteria _I_ think are relevant for the name here: 1/ short. the summary commit message is the 1st line of a commit message, and is limited to 80 chars (72 preferred), and when a commit refer to a bug we want the bug reference in that message. 2/ obvious meaning and easy to remember and type, as much as possible. The opposition I've seen so far to lo# are centered around 'it can be confused with the abbreviation of the product'. I think that is a feature not a bug. in the context of bugzilla the use will always be lo#number the # make it clear that it is a bug number and remove any ambiguity... furtheremore these _are_ libreoffice bugs.. lo = libreoffice, # = bug here. So, other abbreviation may have merit, and may prevails, but discarding lo# for that reason seems a red herring to me. for reference a quick grep of the log message give use the following uses: fdo# deb# n#n #inn# rhbz#nn CID#n cp# bnc# abi# i# #n# lp#n and a mix bag of some mistyped variations thereof (like #fdo) Up at the top of your email you said: I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This is clearly not a bikeshed decision, or you and Mat would (hopefully) not be so invested in what abbreviation is chosen. If it's a big deal, then yes, I agree we should pay more attention to it. If it's not a big deal, then we go ahead and pick from the list. I just need to get a clear message, one way or the other. I'm sympathetic to input from the developers, even at a late stage in this process, which is precisely why I listened to Eike's comments and wrote The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages). Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Up at the top of your email you said: I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This is clearly not a bikeshed decision, or you and Mat would (hopefully) not be so invested in what abbreviation is chosen. A bikeshed is when we have very long discusion about something due to the fact that it is a 'simple' problem, hence everyone feel is his qualified to give some input... see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality And yes, I'm guilty of it here... so I'll leave it be for now... if we end up with xkcd# or lobz# I'll be annoyed, but I'll get over it :-D Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug-Reporting: Needinfo sets confimed to 1
Robinson Tryon wrote Either that, or we figure out a different way to indicate that we want information from the OP or from one of the other commenters/cc'd individuals on the bug. That might require some investment of implementation time... Hi! You can do it by using needinfo extension used on bugzilla.mozilla.org - code at http://bzr.mozilla.org/bmo/4.2/files/head:/extensions/Needinfo/. This is a customized Specifically Requestable flag (cleared when in +/- states), which can be set to request additional information from anyone, reporter, assignee, etc. It will be autocleared when a comment is added. Beeing a flag it can be searched for using quicksearch query flag:needinfo. It has some actions displayed in the UI, customized email notes etc. (please browse the code) . See it live at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917278 for an example (you need to be logged in to see additional UI parts). Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bug-Reporting-Needinfo-sets-confimed-to-1-tp4087006p4087107.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ftp: URLs
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 16:35 -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote: Greetings, all, Where in LibreOffice, I wonder, should you be able to use a URL? (This could stop me before I file a bunch of bugs which turn out to be NOTABUG.) Do you have 'LibreOffice dialogs' enabled? I do now, thank you. And it changes the situation from nothing seems to be working to such a mixture of working and failing that I cannot be sure what I am seeing. I will be smarter tomorrow. Well, maybe. I hope. grin / Terry. https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/Opening_Documents You need those enabled to use WebDAV urls, but it looks like ftp/http is good to go with native dialogs... Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ftp: URLs
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 16:35 -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote: Greetings, all, Where in LibreOffice, I wonder, should you be able to use a URL? (This could stop me before I file a bunch of bugs which turn out to be NOTABUG.) Do you have 'LibreOffice dialogs' enabled? I do now, thank you. And it changes the situation from nothing seems to be working to such a mixture of working and failing that I cannot be sure what I am seeing. I will be smarter tomorrow. Well, maybe. I hope. grin / You don't know the half of it! (well, actually you do -- the half you're experiencing is probably similar to the half *I'm* currently experiencing :-) What I've found so far: - I can't get LO to access an ftp server running on localhost - We have links to non-existent pages on the Help Wiki Just monitor your original bug and I'll fill you in :-) Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Character Line Break set to 0 in Tools - Options - Language Settings - Writing Aids?
Good morning Pedro, *, On Samstag, 7. Dezember 2013 16:45 Pedro wrote: when I open Tools – Options – Writing Aids, and scroll down the Options part, I see the entry Characters before line break: 0 . A doubleclick on it shows a 2 instead. Is this only on my system, or can someone confirm it? You meant Tools Options Language Settings Writing Aids ;) oh, yes. Forgot to mention it here, sorry ... :( I can confirm the same error under Windows XP Pro x86 Sp3 en_US using 4.2 Beta2 Thank you for confirming :) If you click on Characters before line break: 0 and then click on the Edit button you also get the Hyphenation dialog with Characters before break: 2 It is now https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72464. Would you be so kind to confirm it, please? TIA Thomas. -- Zymurgy's Law of Volunteer Labor: People are always available for work in the past tense. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
