Hi Sophie,
thanks for the quick answer :-)
further remarks/explanations:
Am 20.03.2013 14:46, schrieb Sophie Gautier:
On 20/03/2013 14:09, Nino Novak wrote:
Q1: Is it correct that Moztrap is ready and should be used for manual
testing? Is Litmus definitively obsolete? (there are several
On 27/02/2012 11:44, Pedro wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote
Just a note, the tests that we run under Litmus are for all systems, you
can find them here
https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/
anybody is invited to participate in English or in his mother language,
no problem.
Oops, wrong example :)
Hello,
2012.02.27 13:30, Pedro wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote
No, Litmus is an online tool to manage manual test cases.
-snip-
It's really simple to use for the tester, he just has to reproduce what
he is reading on the Litmus site into LibreOffice and then mark the test
as passed, skip or
specific tool
:)
I'm glad other people also agree on OpenID. I wish this was broadly adopted
by the LibreOffice sites and domains :)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-manual-testing-tp3774646p3781634.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
On 27/02/2012, libreoffice-qa-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org
libreoffice-qa-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
--
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:37:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Rimas Kudelis wrote
I don't know why you assume it's a
Readers,
Recent comments in the 'users' mailing list indicate that manual
testing is insufficient. What is the procedure to expand the quantity
and quality of manual tests?
To improve software quality, especially with reference to regression
of previous bugs, a selection of manual tests based
:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-manual-testing-tp3774646p3774658.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http
