On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:34:34 +0100, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this carries (from a QA point of vue) a much heavier
responsibility and care than the change from 3.4.4 to 3.5.0 (which is
experimental)
The planned release date for 3.4.5 is on January 11, 2012 and
apparently
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:46:49 +0100, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
See the attached list of changes against 3.4.5-rc2.
do you mean 3.4.5-rc1 ?
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
On Sun, 13 May 2012 12:57:51 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
* bugs with patches in bugzilla (Michael)
+ unwound half a dozen or more
+ please encourage people to send patches to the mailing list
Hi,
I did a quick query concerning LibO Bugs
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:24:09 +0200, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com
wrote:
* Money offered in bugs (Joel)
+ concerned about the informality:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48729
I was the one who donated the money. P.S. did the bank transfer arrive?
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:36:28 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
mine was just a donation and has not to be intended as I PAID so you
MUST FIX IT !!!
since I have no coding skills, it was the only way I could concretely
contribute to the fixing process. I hope I did not
I hope I did
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:01:11 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Today new Version 3.6.3.2 release has been added.
BSA has also been updated
Note: 3.6.3.2 rc was changed to 3.6.3.2 release because of release notes
stating they are identical
Regards,
Joel
so, if 3.6.3.2 rc is
hi there.
I filed this regression of the 4.0 branch as a MAB
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58060
I found that regression in Version 4.0.0.0.beta1+ (Build ID:
7061f72159e38e76134bc7fefc8a75cd233889c)
while in an older Version 3.7.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: 24761a6) the bug was
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:52:40 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi there.
I filed this regression of the 4.0 branch as a MAB
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58060
I found that regression in Version 4.0.0.0.beta1+ (Build ID:
7061f72159e38e76134bc7fefc8a75cd233889c)
while
hi QA guys.
I filed this bug report.
Bug 58403 - print current page macro has different behaviour in 4.0 beta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
apart from this particular case, is anybody else noticing different
behaviour of macros from the 3.6.x branch and the 4.0 betas?
I
hi QA guys,
I'm gonna ask you one thing about correct labeling the version field in
Bugzilla.
If a bug has always been there from first LibO 3.3 release, and maybe is
inherited from OOo, which version should I choose: unspecified or 3.3.0
beta 2 ?
thanks.
is there any reason for the lack of new daily test builds since few days
ago?
last available daily is from may 16th.
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@6/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On Sun, 19 May 2013 23:06:55 +0200, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Tommy wrote
you should check X-LibreOffice which is an alternative portable package
from winPenPack.com
IMHO X-LibreOffice is much better than the PortableApps package.
Thank you for the suggestion. Just downloaded
On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:00:14 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
this is not correct... they did the 3.3.x and 3.4.x branches as well
(I'm sure because I used those versions) but probably they removed them
from the website since they are very old release.
If you are interested I can ask
On Mon, 20 May 2013 20:06:20 +0200, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Tommy wrote
I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could
be
a valuable tool for QA guys.
It is indeed. Actually it seems that the developers of wPP are more in
the
Open Source spirit than
On Mon, 20 May 2013 12:54:29 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
is there any reason for the lack of new daily test builds since few days
ago?
last available daily is from may 16th.
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@6/
nevermind... daily builds available again from
On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:26:08 +0200, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Starting from version 4.0 LibreOffice no longer supports Windows 2000
(Dropped support of Windows 2000 in
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/4-0-new-features-and-fixes/)
which makes sense since Microsoft itself doesn't
On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 03:24:17 +0200, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
* Pending Action items:
+ update visible bugzilla versions to hide ~all legacy versions (Joel)
.
will the new 3.3 3.4 all release version tags affect only new
hi there,
I still see all the old release numbers in the version field of bugzilla...
I thought to see only 3.3 all versions while I still see 3.3.0, 3.3.1,
3.3.2 and so long...
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:42:18 +0200, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi there,
I still see all the old release numbers in the version field of
bugzilla...
I thought to see only 3.3 all versions while I still see
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:51:47 +0200, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Robinson hath chiseled into stone tablets:
One option available to us in Bugzilla is to hide certain versions on
the New Bug page, but to still make them available when editing a bug.
This would allow us to
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:16:11 +0200, Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Retiered some time ago [can't find thread]. Very sad
Ok, I was afraid that he left the project...
anyway he did a very good job here and everybody will welcome him if he
comes back.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:39:24 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
I'm just curious to know when still living 3.6 bugs will be moved to the
4.0 list.
I offer my help to revise some of those bugs and move them to the new
list if they are still
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:47:29 +0200, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
(I am sorry for duplicit posting. There was a problem in the mailing
list setting and my mail had been eaten.)
Tommy píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 20:39 +0200:
3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
I'm just curious
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:42:57 +0200, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
bfoman píše v So 27. 07. 2013 v 02:44 -0700:
Petr Mladek wrote
About 3000 bugs were fixed for LO 4.1 [...] Only small part of them
was
fixed via the MABs process.
Hi!
Code freeze for 4.0.x branch is set to end of
On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 01:02:09 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:10:40PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
As we build our team up it's becoming more and more possible to
tackle a wider array of things. I am looking for a list
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 02:56:04 +0200, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
+ Closing 3.6 MABs
* Tommy did that, thanks a lot!
not yet finished, it will take more weeks to complete...
when I started the review 62 MABs were present, actually the count is at
49
as many of you should know I'm in the process of completing mab3.6 --
mab4.0 migration.
I need some advice on this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39006
it's still reproducible but I'm not sure it relaly represents a MAB.
I mean, it affects a single file, has no duplicates
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 18:46:38 +0200, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Minutes from our QA Meeting and our Pub Chat are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_09
check this bug report:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68294
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
I think it's useless both on freedesktop and BSA.
few users use that and most of the time they use inappropriately (I
cleaned up some reports with see in summary tag but no version indicated
in the summary).
I think it should be removed from the dropdown menu,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:00:30 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
I think it's useless both on freedesktop and BSA.
few users use that and most of the time they use inappropriately (I
cleaned up some reports with see in summary tag but no version
indicated in the summary).
I think it should
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:37:59 +0200, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
I think it's useless both on freedesktop and BSA.
few users use that and most of the time they use inappropriately
snip ...
I believe
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:32:33 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Just did the following:
Changed 3.3.0 Beta2 to Inherited from OOo as this is almost certainly
the case (Brilliant idea from Florian) - then I added a new version
3.3.0 Beta2 which is empty. This means
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 08:37:30 +0200, Robert Großkopf
rob...@familiegrosskopf.de wrote:
Hello Joel,
Just did the following:
Changed 3.3.0 Beta2 to Inherited from OOo ... snip ...
The first availible version of LO is 3.3.0 beta1 snip ...
Not every bug, which appears in LO 3.3.0 beta2
is
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:22:43 +0200, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl
wrote:
Hi,
The BSA has no see in summary. It is only in Bugzilla.
When we have our own bugzilla it is possible to have different versions
for those, till then I suggest the unspecified-option.
--
Greetings,
Rob
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:31:43 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
what about new feature requests?
let's say I wanna open a Bug WXYZ - make coffee :-)
should we label this as inherited from LibO or to 3.3.0
IMHO if it's a bug right label is inherited from LibO while a new
feature should
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:32:33 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Just did the following:
Changed 3.3.0 Beta2 to Inherited from OOo as this is almost certainly
the case (Brilliant idea from Florian) - then I added a new version
3.3.0 Beta2 which is empty.
... snip
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:09:42 +0200, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Florian Reisinger has developed a Windows installer which performs a
parallel installation of LibreOffice on Windows without using the
command line. This is really useful for Windows testers or even for
immediate hurdles to creating the repo on another OS.
Tommy -- could you do some testing if I take a crack at creating a
repo?
I'd like to test it for sure.
If you need additional informations I can ping the gays at
http://www.winpenpack.com who are the authors of X-LibreOffice
After the gerrit
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:20:57 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
... snip ...
I'd like to test it for sure.
If you need additional informations I can ping the gays at
http://www.winpenpack.com who are the authors of X-LibreOffice
Obviously a typing error... I meant the guys at http
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:52:12 +0200, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tommy
Tommy wrote
Window user can however do manual regression tests using the portable
X-LibreOffice version developed from winPenPack.
here's their repository including all versions they did:
http://sourceforge.net
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:21:06 +0200, bjoern
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
what about new feature requests?
let's say I wanna open a Bug WXYZ - make coffee :-)
IMHO there is 'unspecified' for that.
Best,
Bjoern
as said in another post I would probably go with inherited from OOo
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:07:26 +0200, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Florian Reisinger
flo...@libreoffice.org wrote:
Hi,
So I am going to create one for Windows, or is there a volunteer with
more Git Know-How and maybe a faster upload?
since 4.1.1.2 has been subsequently released as final I suggest to change
the label to 4.1.1.2 release as done before in previous versions.
bye, TOMMY
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
List Name
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:11:54 +0200, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Apart from keeping the number_of_unconfirmed low, I also find it useful
to try to make summaries as clear as possible: looking at the result of
a query, that helps a lot to pick the right issues to look e.g. for
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:57:43 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 01:07:26 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:13:51 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
since 4.1.1.2 has been subsequently released as final I suggest to
change the label to 4.1.1.2
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:16:18 +0200, Michael Meeks
michael.me...@collabora.com wrote:
* QA update (Robinson)
+ noticed a couple of people CC'ing developers on bugs (Joel)
+ been an issue in the past - what's the story now
+ sberg - likes to be CC'd on bugs
+ moggi -
I think it's time to remove all the 3.5.x betas and rc from the
freedesktop versions dropdown menu, like it was already done for 3.3.x and
3.4.x
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
List Name:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:59:28 +0200, Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd really like to get the process passed as official, put it on our wiki
page, and encourage people to report UX bugs.
Since none of you replied to the original message, please give input
before
next Saturday
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:55:24 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've begun the process of collapsing 3.5.x to 3.5 all releases. I've
already hidden all RC's and Beta's other than 3.5.0. Beta0 (we're still
using this as pre-bibisect version, QA still needs to figure
Bjoern, Sophie, SteveBell, Tommy, etc... before we make any
final decisions.
--R
actually you meetings are done friday from 6 to 7 PM (italian time) and
I'm still at work at that time. it would be better for me from 7 to 8 PM
(italian time) but I understand it cannot be changed just for me
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 05:49:52 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
A big thanks to all of the QA folks who have listed their hours of
availability on the Doodle or who have emailed us directly. We
received a lot of useful input and are optimistic that our new time
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 05:12:15 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
We ran into some technical difficulties during this week's QA call, so
before our next scheduled meeting, I'd like to do a test-run of our
call/Hangout setup and iron-out any problems we find.
TODOs
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 07:28:36 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hiya,
As mentioned at the QA Meeting, I've provided a first draft of the
proposal to migrate from FDO to our own install of Bugzilla:
for libo
lo makes me think about J.Lo :-)
https://twitter.com/JLo
my preference would be blo (acronym for bugs.libreoffice.org -
if this is the correct URL for the new tracker)
+1
Thank you for your suggestion
Thomas.
blo could be nice choice indeed.
tommy
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 17:47:18 +0100, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.2.0, the builds for beta1 are now
available on pre-releases
The list of fixed bugs relative to 4.2.0 alpha is here:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:52:27 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-)
...
Here's the list (in alphabetical order):
* blo
please, avoid. I don't wanna be exposed to unpolite jokes about QA is
doing blo job
as you all can see here (scroll to bottom of the page):
http://snipurl.com/287u2ky
the UNCONFIRMED bug count is again below 1000.
many thanks to all the QA volunteers who helped reaching this goal.
I think that the QA team should monitor all the other figures of the first
column (which is
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:04:10 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Last week I sent out an email congratulating the team for getting the
bug count down to 1,1,24 unconfirmed bugs (this was down nearly 100 in
just a couple weeks).
Well, thanks to some incredible effort by
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 19:31:47 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the list (in alphabetical order):
* blo
* lbz
* libo
* lo
* lob
* lobz
Thanks,
--R
___
my two votes go to:
lob
lobz
please add 4.1.4.1 and 4.1.4.2 to the dropdown list
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:30:03 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Goku's power level may be over 9000[1], but I'd like to see our
UNCONFIRMED bug count drop under 900 this week!
We're almost there!
it seems the QA team is doing a great job and is close to break another
mileston.
please help us bring the count below 800
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 00:01:53 +0100, jorendc jore...@libreoffice.org
wrote:
Hi team,
Tommy schreef op 28/12/2013 23:43:
it seems the QA team is doing a great job and is close to break another
mileston.
please help us bring the count below 800
Wow, that number looks really nice
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 00:01:53 +0100, jorendc jore...@libreoffice.org
wrote:
Hi team,
Tommy schreef op 28/12/2013 23:43:
it seems the QA team is doing a great job and is close to break another
mileston.
please help us bring the count below 800
Wow, that number looks really nice
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:13:30 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Really incredible work:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets=UNCONFIRMED
Down to739! Lowest it has been in over 2 years! With this team doing the
work they're doing - plus the
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:13:30 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Really incredible work:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets=UNCONFIRMED
Down to739! Lowest it has been in over 2 years!...
see also this chart:
http://snipurl.com/28ew3u5
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:01:35 +0100, Alex Thurgood
alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 07/01/2014 13:58, Tommy a écrit :
see also this chart:
http://snipurl.com/28ew3u5
Firefox doesn't like that link. Seems to think there's a security risk
associated with snipurl.com
Alex
strange
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:22:30 +0100, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.2.0, the builds for rc4 are now
available on pre-releases (some windows helppacks still uploading)
Besides the usual builds, there are also 64bit builds for Mac
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:15:44 +0100, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.1.5, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases
...
RC2 is the second of two planned release candidates, see
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 03:07:23 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Just got done with a large FDO cleanup so apologies for any flood in the
email - any FDO mails in the last 5 minutes or so can be ignored/deleted
as they just contain a standard message for NEEDINFO bugs.
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:08:08 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure
jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
Le 02/02/2014 09:06, Joel Madero a écrit :
[...]
I can see the point of this but my suggestion is we wait until we get
our own bug tracker and can prevent the spam that will go out. Also
maybe make it so
I've recently noticed that user Stephane Guillou (aka chtfn on bugzilla)
spent several time testing all existing unfixed mab4.0 and moved them to
mab4.1 list
actually just 2 mab4.0 are still untested
Bug 36799 - If you insert an envelope into a document only the envelope is
printed (Mac
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:10:25 +0100, Jan Holesovsky ke...@collabora.com
wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=60270hide_resolved=1
* Open 4.0 MAB
+ 4/166 49/211 52/211 54/212 52/210 52/208 52/208 55/208 56/208 55/208
2%23%24%25%24%25%
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:22:56 +0100, Zeki Bildirici
zeki.ozguryazi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I made a caps to show my feelings during the bug reporting process for
LibreOffice. I share this list too to thank all the hardworking QA
team, hope you'll enjoy it :)
Caps:
bump
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:34:05 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
I've recently noticed that user Stephane Guillou (aka chtfn on
bugzilla) spent several time testing all existing unfixed mab4.0 and
moved them to mab4.1 list
actually just 2 mab4.0 are still untested
Bug 36799 - If you
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:43:01 +0100, Andras Timar ti...@fsf.hu wrote:
Bug 59613 - RTL VIEWING: Increasing size of dialogs to right or bottom
causes artifacts
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59613
This one is still there in 4.1 and 4.2. BTW you can test RTL with
en-US builds, if
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:18:54 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
I think we'll have the ability to add the additional version (branch)
once we have our own instance of bugzilla. My suggestion is three
version fields:
1. oldest version
2. latest version confirmed
3. branch
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 08:54:45 +0200, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
So I reintroduce this amended with Joel remarks:
Target: 4.3.0 beta1 on week 21 (May 19-25)
Banner on the website: week 16 (April 14-20)
First communication: week 17 (April 21-27)
Reminder: week 19 (May 5-11)
I stumbled upon this freeware application and I wonder if it may help
doing backtraces or profiling under Window.
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/simple_program_debugger.html
unfortunately I have no experience to judge if the output of this software
may be useful or not for QA and developers.
On Sun, 04 May 2014 18:45:23 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept
3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of before bibisect).
I see no 3.6 all release it was added for 3.4 and 3.5
Two
On Sun, 04 May 2014 18:45:23 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept
3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of before bibisect).
Two questions:
1. Can I do the same for 4.0 or should I wait longer ?
On Fri, 09 May 2014 16:52:11 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Esp. When we are about to change the stable to mature.
Best,
Charles.
IMHO not a good idea... the mature term would be prone to jokes..
try type mature in google and see all the
On Mon, 12 May 2014 16:03:29 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
...
Some experimentation suggests mellow might be a choice -- it
seems to suggest boring without saying obsolete or other negative
conotations:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mellow
Not
On Mon, 12 May 2014 17:10:12 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
...
Please let me know what you prefer ASAP so we can gauge what's best.
...
Best,
Joel
unfortunately I cannot join the QA calls anymore...
it's not a matter of time... when I'm at work I have to work
take a look at them we could finally close
the mab4.1 list.
it would be nice if the job could be finished by the end of the month.
thanks 4 your attention
Tommy
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
List Name
On Fri, 16 May 2014 07:13:38 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi guys,
please take some time to help me finishing the mab4.1 to mab4.2
migration.
of the initial 76 MABs I have now just 15 left that I have troubles to
reproduce.
here's the list:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org
On Wed, 21 May 2014 19:33:49 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 07:13:38 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi guys,
please take some time to help me finishing the mab4.1 to mab4.2
migration.
here's the list:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id
On Mon, 26 May 2014 06:44:37 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Can someone take a look at this one:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79194
Looks pretty nasty - if confirmed IMHO should be on mab4.3 list.
Thanks!
Joel
I think it's a dup of
On Fri, 23 May 2014 14:04:45 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 19:33:49 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi guys,
please take some time to help me finishing the mab4.1 to mab4.2
migration.
here's the list:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id
hi QA guys,
I've created a new mab4.4 page at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641
moreover I ask confirmation of the last surviving mab4.1 at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59613 so we can finally close
that meta-issue
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 07:16:44 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Tommy - I moved that one - leaving the pleasure of closing 4.1 mab to
you :)
Best,
Joel
P.S. Thanks for your incredible work
closed. :-)
___
List Name: Libreoffice
I'd like to try debugging and obtaining a trace.
I was told that I need a build with symbols.
where can I find one 4.4.x master build for Windows?
I took a look at this link:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/symbols/
but it looks confusing to me what should I
Hi, I need some Linux user to confirm and then profile this nasty
performance regression of the autocorrect engine in 4.4 master
Bug 79761 - autocorrect slow-down got worse
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79761
I tried debugging and profiling with Windows tools but Micheal Meeks
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:12:51 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 4.2.5. The upcoming 4.2.5 will be the fifth
in a sequence of frequent bugfix releases for our
4.2.x still is in the fresh category
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:56:46 +0200, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tommy,
I assume 4.2 cant become stable until 4.3 becomes fresh. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
that makes sense.
___
List Name
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 05:20:52 +0200, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Just noticed that 4.2 and 4.3 havent gotten new builds since the 23rd.
it seems to me that the issue is limited to Linux TB 45 which has last
build available from 23rd.
other TB are up to date
as all of you should know, 4.1.x reached end of life few months ago
I thinks it's time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions from bugzilla version
dropdown menu and leave just the final releases like it has already been
done in previous dead branches
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:44:33 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
I believe we agreed to give it 6 months from EOL to give time for
transition. I could be wrong though ;)
Best,
Joel
ok, maybe you are right... I now remember that 6 months embargo too.
hi there
I wonder if it's possible to have this bugzilla weekly stat page on a
monthly or yearly basis
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html
is there any place I can tweak the time period which is actually limited
to last week?
--
Using Opera's revolutionary
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
