https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #15 from Christian Lohmaier ---
*THIS* is about portable, continuing ramblings about *OTHER* bugs won't change
anything.
And you can write bullshit about "dependency problems" as much as you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
--- Comment #6 from Adolfo Jayme ---
FWIW, I’ve already changed the mnemonic of this button once, because someone
found it non-intuitive:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #14 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #12)
> that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by
> TDF without dependency hell. If you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #13 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #10)
I see that you have not answered my question is it has nothing to say about it?
> the point is not about a linux
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
Laurent BP changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #12 from Christian Lohmaier ---
that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by TDF
without dependency hell. If you already had LO, you can install update. Even if
you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #11 from Hans Deragon ---
Users want to use the latest version on Linux without requiring to go to the
terminal and try to fix dependency hell. They simply want to fetch the latest
version from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #10 from Christian Lohmaier ---
the point is not about a linux version in general, but about a portable
version. Why would you need a portable version of LibreOffice for linux?
Chanches are that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
--- Comment #13 from Commit Notification
---
Laurent Balland-Poirier committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
--- Comment #12 from Commit Notification
---
Laurent Balland-Poirier committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
--- Comment #11 from Commit Notification
---
Laurent Balland-Poirier committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:5.2.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
I agree with Stuart that we should keep the first letter as accelerator. Would
be interesting, by the way, where you see a missing consistency.
Anyway, to improve the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
--- Comment #3 from Dan Dascalescu ---
@V Stuart: do you think users care more about the difference between "shortcut"
and "accelerator" (I mentioned both terms in my report BTW), or about their
muscle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #9 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #8)
> I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just
> extract the rpms using e.g.
>
> for i in
17 matches
Mail list logo