ion was there: users could display or hide the
text limits; why change that?
This opinion seems somewhat shared by some others since the v.3.5
release. What people here think?
Thanks for your work and for your attention.
Best regards,
--
Jean-Francois
es: please, don't tell the new UX-ers that they'd get what they
want if they code it themselves. That's not encouraging into any further
participation, thus this is counter-productive.
All the best and thank you for your attention,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
_
essages wrt various UX topics I'm
considering important, I'd better know how things are held so that the
threads don't go wild because of respective ignorance.
Thanks for your time.
Best regards,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Hello Michael and all,
wow! At least! Some *precise* and to the point answers! Thanks!
Le 18/02/2012 09:21, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 08:50 +0100, Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
As I understand (correct me if necessary) this list goal -- which I find
excellent -- is to
would be beneficial to their users. (hence my visit here ;)
Now, back to the discussion :)
Le 18/02/2012 15:51, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 14:00 +0100, Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
Ah! Ah! I'm starting to get the real thing which has nothing to see with
what I was
Michael, Stefan,
thanks for your time and for making me feel guilty for not joining the
devs bandwagon ;-)
Le 18/02/2012 19:45, Stefan Knorr (Astron) a écrit :
On 18 February 2012 17:22, Jean-Francois Nifenecker
wrote:
In a former part of my professional life, I had been an unofficial
to grab a daily build to test it.
I won't, for sure!
Thanks for your hard work and for listening.
All the best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.
with testing and giving
feedback in an early stage :-)
Yes, for sure...
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
commit/?id=7794baf89e74fc8308c8e1505f47d60b6547465f
Don't hesitate to grab a daily build to test it.
I did!
LOdev 3.6.0alpha0+
Build ID: 9518535-d09cf17-8a74106-c695ecd-16afab
Great job Cedric! Thank you! Exactly the way I thought it should be.
All the best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifen
d apply the correct
character style (bold emphasis by default) instead of setting the bold
property to the underlying characters.
Side note: I feel a very important need for table styles in Writer.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libr
iple steps and allow a simple way of changing
dimensions proportionaly. That checkbox state should be recorded.
This has annoyed me since the very beginning when I got to use OOo 1.1.
Would the change be a big deal?
Thanks for your attention,
--
Jean-Francois
Le 28/04/2012 15:27, Regina Henschel a écrit :
The position of [ and ] depends on local. A German keyboard has it on
AltGr+8 and AltGr+9.
Yes. FR kbd has them on AltGr+5 / AltGr+)
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise
, contrary to what you're thinking.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
't see, I think it would be better to have
both presets' selection to behave consistently.
Thanks for your attention,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
htt
tween the cell contents (ie, the data bar) and the cell
(possibly invisible) border, then the large layout is the best for me.
In this case, with the small version, the user is constrained to have
some spacing which he might not want. Thus the large layout fits more
needs/tastes.
--
Jean-Fra
size is 7,398 B
-> is a 15 B difference such a big deal?
As for the users' confusion: yes, it might be. OTOH, I think it might
also help users understand a spreadsheet can hold more than one sheet.
As a result, I'd stay with the current 3 default
quot;Edit" menu, which would
obviously mostly serve to advertise our new accelerator
** Mirek's proposal of a red caret seems very good to me if we go with
either of the above two ways (but a red block would be even more
descriptive methinks)
Dunno about the red thing wrt visually impa
t the print preview is cluttered. To me, it
is too much integrated with the modules. A modal window would less
disturb the user, making things clear about what is what (eg: the page
preview in Calc displays two zoom rulers... why so? Which is the right one?)
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecke
cise
with the Format/Page dialog and that the page preview is quite
unpracticable to this regard.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma
moved, because we have them now in the
status bar.
I wanted to point that the close appearance of both items (top slider in
the Preview toolbar and bottom slider in the status bar) confuse the
user. This is why I'd prefer a modal window for page previewing.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker
is the actual font size.
And, disabling the aufit feature after having enabled it should give the
original font size back, of course.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise
continue working on his document. But, of course, this operation should
be undoable (which it is not currently).
Thanks for your comments,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.
gy is the core of the question.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
se the software.
We, as a free-software, have a responsibility: make the people
understand that, whatever tool they elect, they have to understand it
then to learn its use.
So I repeat my answer: the rulers must certainly *not* be hidden,
neither in Writer nor in Impress.
--
Jean-Fran
rd is a productivity tool, when compared
with the mouse, as it doesn't interfere with the user workflow. During
trainings, I always emphasize on that point (regardless of the tool or
operating system).
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
L
size on that and LibO rulez :)
All the best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
or underline a whole word, but uncommon for a
whole word to be a subscript or a superscript.
Would this subscript/superscript behaviour be optional?
I've seen technical docs using superscript for whole words.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
__
ssage box for that matter.
My 2 euro-cents,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
it really apply? I
haven't got a definitive answer here.
Or if devs can re-associate style to the text, then no need for
confirmation. But it should be much much more complicated !
Yep. This would be the best option and I agree it might be difficult to
implement.
which people don't really understand. That's
the cabinet icon Fitoschido was referring to.
Not everyone knows what a cabinet is because they never had one at work.
No wonder they can't understand the icon meaning.
This is why *I* don't like that one and prefer the (usual) flopp
ascertain that most of my
colleagues wouldn't know either (fortunately we're using the Windows
version with the floppy icon ;-)
And it doesn't look like any nightstand I had.
Some kind of a cultural gap, maybe?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
o remain, imo.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
to the congrats above. Really very nice. I'd also
prefer file names alone + tooltip showing the full path to the file.
Is there a maximum number of pickable files?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
L
ent *from* a template.
This is what a user wants most of the time.
I guess the words have some weight here.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
bumps when I think to the work
that was required from the poor guy who made that... err... thing.
Worse, if possible: this %$&§ is *still* in use although I trained these
people to use Draw :,(
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-
al format is, well, local.
IOW, changing a style is worth the few extra clicks, if any and setting
direct formatting is actually requiring many more clicks (you forgot to
multiply the local formatting clicks by the number of local settings).
--
Jean-Francois Nifeneck
Styles are a blessing. And no other tool
comes to par with LibreOffice for that matter. Let's claim it!
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freed
re meant to
apply. AFAIK, the current hiding mechanism do support that well.
-- Table styles
A long-time missing feature
-- Simplify the list styles
(though I do like them)
and probably others...
All the best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
_
job in their context.
Hopefully I was clear enough, that time.
All the best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
omatic behaviours, just
because it means you forget it after a (short) while and if things go
bad, you don't know how to set them back.
Having been in first level help desk for years, I can see how often
people are bitten by such automatisms (auto backup is an example).
>
> Just my
Noone wants to hear these words, but they have to be told.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
Hi Tomaž,
Le 11/09/2013 16:31, Tomaž Vajngerl a écrit :
>
> What do you think about this change?
>
A lng time dream of mine \o/
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-
press a shortcut, the software then shows a menu with all current
metadata variables, and a "Add..." entry for adding a new one).
My 2 euro-cents,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreof
there
> will be need for that.
Argh! Stop comparing LibO to MSO. Please. LibO has to get its own
personality and be itself. Promoting styles, for instance :)
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Li
Hi Mirek,
Le 14/11/2013 22:45, Mirek M. a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Jean-Francois Nifenecker
> <mailto:jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 14/11/2013 17:10, Mirek M. a écrit :
> > I would definitely vote f
more misplaced Navigation buttons ,
-- the functionality would be more visible, even if the Navigator is not
on screen,
-- Ctrl+F would call the bunch of search tools (I love shortcuts ;)
What do you think?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
s doesn't seem very
confusing to me. YMMV.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
uot;Use ODF Format"). I
fear that John Doe understands "Office" as "LibreOffice" whereas it
stands for "MS-Office".
So, IMO, the button selection is not only a question of placement.It is
also a question of clarity of contents.
Well,
o
> keep
> the bar displayed. What do you think?
This makes sense to me (yet another toolbar!), although I can't see why
the "navigation" tools couldn't be integrated within another existing
toolbar. The Search toolbar comes to mind first, of course
reover this is consistent with
the OS startup menu.
As for the "Writer Document", I don't like the "document" word because
the suite does just that: documents, whatever the module used. Writer
creates *text* documents, Calc generates *sp
quot;don't touch that" or "transfert the functionality to some
place where John Doe can find it as easily as he would now". My two
proposals above are going that route.
HTH,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
L
one.
Best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
emove that floating window since the navigator is in the
> sidebar (see bug #73151).
>
Unless I missed the obvious, the sidebar doesn't allow to view the
Navigator *and* the Stylist both at once. In this case, I much prefer
the two individual panels, anchored one above the other (on the r
the sidebar, is to put the panes into "View > Floating Panes" (and
> remove them from the toolbar).
>
Dunno how restrictive is your wording "Floating Panes", but it is
obvious to me that these panes *must* be able to be anchored.
Are you trying to
, the font drop-down *is*
used very often.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
;s
any yet. A professional writer or power user needs accessing the
Navigator and the Stylist all the time. Keeping the current shortcuts
(F5 and F11 resp.) is a requirement. BTW, having new ones for the other
Sidebar panes would ensure consistency.
Thanks,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker
chor character style instead of
hard-formatting it using superscript.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
ld also be useful
>> for many other types of objects.
>
+1000!
BTW, note that currently, the naming constraints are not consistent
across objects: some accept spaces (eg: frame name) others won't (eg:
table name).
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
ative providing the same capabilities would be
interesting to check but I can't see where the mockups you provide in
the bug report 89566 can compare to the current Navigation toolbar. Or
did I miss smthg?
Anyway, thanks for your work.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker
to notice that at first. Does the drop
down (which is not displayed in the mockup) include all the current
Navigation toolbar buttons, ie: Reminders, Controls, etc?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libr
from another one (my actual situation for the template stated
above). Well, anyway, the Paper tray option is already in the Page Style
dialog.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
Hi
Le 18/09/2015 13:23, bugzilla-dae...@bugs.documentfoundation.org a écrit :
UX: what do you think?
Agreed. But, conversely, going back to the default default template
(hard-coded?) should be easy as well.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
62 matches
Mail list logo
