Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL or AGPL by default

I agree, I tend to recommend the latest version of the AGPL together with "or later" nowadays. My future projects which do practical works will also be under such license. ;) Lyberta writes: > Given how quickly SaaSS is taking over the world, should we start > recommending

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL or AGPL by default

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 07:52:42AM +0200, Nicolás Ortega Froysa wrote: > > From the legal and technical side (not the practical side where someone > simply ignores the license, which can happen with GPL as well) what does > it not solve exactly? I would not be surprised if there were some issues >

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL or AGPL by default

On 09/19/2017 10:52 PM, Nicolás Ortega Froysa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:56:23PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: >> On 09/19/2017 11:50 AM, Nicolás Ortega Froysa wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:08:00PM +, Lyberta wrote: Given how quickly SaaSS is taking over the world, should we

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL or AGPL by default

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:56:23PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 09/19/2017 11:50 AM, Nicolás Ortega Froysa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:08:00PM +, Lyberta wrote: > >> Given how quickly SaaSS is taking over the world, should we start > >> recommending releasing software under AGPL by

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL or AGPL by default

On 09/19/2017 11:08 AM, Lyberta wrote: > Given how quickly SaaSS is taking over the world, should we start > recommending releasing software under AGPL by default? Even if you wrote > a simple thing intended to be run locally, someone may put it on the > server, make SaaSS with it and then add

[libreplanet-discuss] GPL or AGPL by default

Given how quickly SaaSS is taking over the world, should we start recommending releasing software under AGPL by default? Even if you wrote a simple thing intended to be run locally, someone may put it on the server, make SaaSS with it and then add private modifications. signature.asc