On 06/16/2016 04:49 AM, Luke wrote:
> You bring up a good point, there is a risk of having words twisted, but
> I think that is a price to pay for free speech.
Free speech means saying what you want to say (if it's not hate speech,
but that a different discussion) as your own opinion. Repeating
On 06/15/2016 11:24 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > 2. **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works
> > included in products of the Parabola project are [Free
> > Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition),
>
> I will fetch that page now, but if I remember
Hi,
We are quite satisfied with the performance of the Tehnoetic N300
Wireless USB Adapter for GNU/Linux-libre:
https://tehnoetic.com/tet-n300
Tiberiu
PS We have submitted this and other recently added WiFi adapters for the
RYF certification of FSF.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 25.08.2016 11:42, Christopher Waid wrote:
> I'm having a hard time taking you seriously. Wake me when you've
> actually contributed something of significance and aren't just trying to
> undermine those working on solving these problems. For some of us it
> isn't about financial gain. We
On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even
> the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be
> easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no need
> to make everyone mad at
On 26.08.2016 19:27, Ali Razeen wrote:
> I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to
> rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree. I believe you
> claim that we cannot say that the EOMA68 is “libre hardware from the
> beginning” because we
Thank you, Ali. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer my
call and share your opinion on the libreplanet-discuss mailing list.
On 26.08.2016 16:28, Ali Razeen wrote:
> If this is true in the libre hardware world,
I follow your logic, but I'm not sure there is an exact analogy libre
On 26.08.2016 21:48, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> It seems the problem is the meaning of “libre” in terms of unreleased
> hardware/software. EOMA68 certainly is aligned with libre culture and
> significant for freedom because of its modularity standard. It also is
> GPL-compliant like any
On 26.08.2016 22:47, Eric Schultz wrote:
> This isn't really my topic but you've made your point (repeatedly).
> Respectfully, please don't fill my inbox to say the same thing over and
> over when people disagree and when numerous people have asked you to
> stop and to drop them from discussions.
Ali, thanks for your arguments. Schematics don't make a hardware
free-design hardware, as PaulK has stated and as Richard's essay
explains. It's the PCB design sources. Schematics are usually PDF files.
I doubt any of the people who now hold the EOMA68-A20 computer boards
would disobey the
On 26.08.2016 23:03, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> I have to disagree here. Comparing this to GPL violation is outrageous.
You might be right and the parallelism I made is too extrapolated.
Thanks for noting that.
Tiberiu
On 26.08.2016 19:05, Josh Branning wrote:
> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic
>
> Maybe they /do/ intend to release the CAD files when they say they will.
> In which case, has it occurred to you that the kind of things you are
> saying:
>
> A) May look a bit silly once (and
On 26.08.2016 02:18, Christopher Waid wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 05:59 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>> On 25.08.2016 11:42, Christopher Waid wrote:
>>> I'm having a hard time taking you seriously. Wake me when you've
>>> actually contributed something of signific
On 26.08.2016 04:03, André Silva wrote:
> Hi guys, i let you know that our url about EOMA68 news has been changed
> [0] to fix misleading information there too.
>
> [0]:https://www.parabola.nu/news/new-ryf-seeking-hardware-crowdfunding-project-with-parabola-pre-installed/
That's a good thing.
On 26.08.2016 05:16, Christopher Waid wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 06:26 PM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>> On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>>> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>>>> This issue of "you said it is 'lib
On 26.08.2016 05:22, Christopher Waid wrote:
> The project is claiming to be a libre hardware/software project, not
> that everything has been released yet.
Then it's not a libre hardware project yet!
And need I remind you that outside your organization there is an
organization/user of an EOMA68
On 26.08.2016 01:33, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le vendredi 26 août 2016 à 01:26 +0300, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic a écrit :
>> On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>> This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even
>> the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be
>> easily
On 26.08.2016 06:22, John Sullivan wrote
> What this *should* be is a discussion among people on the same side to
> refine text and messaging such that it is accurate, approachable, and
> effective. Please make it that.
I believe your or other FSF staff member's comments on the points raised
here
5% off free software-friendly devices from ThinkPenguin" --
https://my.fsf.org/
But for you it must be as you say, just a "minor issue" you "can't
afford waste time" on it. For the rest of us, including founder of the
free software movement and the GNU project, it's not:
On
20 matches
Mail list logo
