Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:31:18 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:03:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:37:44 -0600 (GMT+6)
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Note: No drive overlay was present through all of these tests.
Re-installing Windows 98:
* Booted 110 from FDD, and reformatted primary C: partition
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:24:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
After a several approaches at resolving the problem of W98 on C: 8GB not
seeing files folders properly on a 8GB G: partition without EZ-Drive
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:52:39 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:56:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:57:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
--- Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I did allow scandisk to repair a couple of these errors last week
before switching C: from
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:20:58 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:22:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:56:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
--- Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what happened on you Lib is that initially scandisk got confused
because of the 0b setting
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:22:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Philip,
Thought I'd 1st try a quick and easy route of addressing the problems I've
been having by trying converting partition types as you had
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:04:55 -0800
From: carr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
HI
Nero ver 6.0.0 and up has Virtual CD incorprated to it, they call them
(you get 2) Image Drive
I used to use Daemon, but use Nero now, one less program
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:28:01 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
long snip
I did download the Ranish Partition Editor some time back for some reason,
but never used it. I'll check it out
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:08:10 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:40:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:40:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
--- Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But FAT32 partitions in the extended partition beyond 8 GB need to be
type 0c (Win95 FAT32 LBA
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:27:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Drouillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
2. I don't know if this could have been a factor,
though I doubt it. I
installed the old Farstone 'Virtual CD' software on
both XP and 98 so
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:26:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
--- Jim Drouillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not familiar with Farstone but I'd recommend
trying the free Daemon-Tools (www.daemon
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:46:06 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:59:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:47:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
I need help recovering the ability to boot W2K.
I've been having all kinds of FAT32 file system problems after finally
deciding to install W2K on a D:
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:33:52 -0600 (GMT+6)
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
What it looks like to me is a couple three things. 1) the hibernation
partition may be in the wrong spot. 2) wrong disk driver. 3) you are
booting
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:24:22 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:47:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: When EZ-Drive is a must for W98
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:05:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Hey Philip... Have read through yours and John's replies and have archived
them for reference. Will be very busy for the next few days, so I'm
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 00:41:23 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:05:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
20 matches
Mail list logo
