Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no fixed disks present

2000-08-24 Thread neil barnes
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:28:58 GMT From: "neil barnes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no fixed disks present Fubar, It looks awfully as if the bios is seeing *nothing* where a disk ought to be...I know this is a long shot, but if you wake up the bios (lots of escs as

Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no fixed disks present

2000-08-24 Thread Fubar Libretto
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:31:08 GMT From: "Fubar Libretto" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no fixed disks present Hello Galliform Sapients, Chickens, and anyone else who is reading It looks awfully as if the bios is seeing *nothing* where a disk ought to be...I know this

Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no fixed disks present

2000-08-24 Thread neil barnes
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:52:16 GMT From: "neil barnes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no fixed disks present Below... From: "Fubar Libretto" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Libretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Libretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lib.HD problem - FDISK=no

fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread Cooper, Greg
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:08:30 -0400 From: "Cooper, Greg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) Here's one for the gallery: I want to partition a drive with 2 FAT16 partitions but I want the second partition to be at the end of the disk. I want 2.047GB for C:, an empty

Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on.

2000-08-24 Thread Jim Ferguson
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:23:29 -0400 From: Jim Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on. I replaced the original Win95 OS with Win98 (98Lite) and converted to FAT32. All Toshiba utility and driver files were loaded. Everything works well except for one thing. When

RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread Cooper, Greg
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:37:14 -0400 From: "Cooper, Greg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) I was afraid someone would ask. Here's the short version of it: My automated/unattended installation of NT4 requires a fat16 primary partition. No problem except that

RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread andy
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) Why not just create an fat 16 partition, install NT, Get everything working, convert it to NTFS after NT has been installed and working. Then run partition magic and extend the

RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread Cooper, Greg
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:58:05 -0400 From: "Cooper, Greg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) This is supposed to be a rather automated install for the masses who don't have the hardware to install Win2000. I can't justify buying 5,000 copies of PartMagic for an OS

RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread Berlant, Michael S
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:01:55 -0400 From: "Berlant, Michael S" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) I see two problems with that. First, one of the original premises is not to have to purchase Partition Magic or any other paid software utility. Second, isn't

Re: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on.

2000-08-24 Thread Lawrence Young
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:06:53 -0400 From: "Lawrence Young" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on. - Original Message - From: "Jim Ferguson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Libretto" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 11:28 AM Subject: Libretto

RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread andy
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:16:52 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) Well in that case you just need 1 copy of ghost enterprise edition. It will expand the partition and dump NT. Takes 15-30 minutes per operating system. That way you just pay for

RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread andy
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) You have a point with the libretto. But you can use NTFSPro to repair NT partitions. Can't say its perfect but I guess it would be easier with Fat16 on a libretto. I guess you

Re: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on.

2000-08-24 Thread Jim Ferguson
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:39:09 -0400 From: Jim Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on. I did update the bios. Installation was Not Win98SE. (regular Win98) Jim Lawrence Young wrote: Did you updated your L100 BIOS to make it ACPI compliant with Win98

Re: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on.

2000-08-24 Thread Digby Tarvin
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:55:54 +0100 (GMT/BST) From: Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Libretto 100-On/Off LED stays on. I replaced the original Win95 OS with Win98 (98Lite) and converted to FAT32. All Toshiba utility and driver files were loaded. Everything works well except

Re: fdisk question (non-Lib specific)

2000-08-24 Thread neil barnes
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:03:44 GMT From: "neil barnes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fdisk question (non-Lib specific) Well, you *could* do it with a bit of hex editing... Or make three partitions, delete the middle one? Or fdisk from most linuxes let you specify start and end cylinders, then

Re: Memory upgrade

2000-08-24 Thread David Chien
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:38:00 -0700 (PDT) From: David Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Memory upgrade They must have given you a 8MB RAM module instead of a 16MB module. Libretto 50 CT but memory checking and Windows 95 read only 24 Mb and not 32Mb. What is wrong? Could anybody help me?

RE: Lib.HD problem - BIOS says No Drive

2000-08-24 Thread Paul D. J. Davila
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:30:34 -0400 From: "Paul D. J. Davila" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Lib.HD problem - BIOS says No Drive someone remind me again how do I access the bios on a lib50 Paul D. J. Davila www.geocities.com/bronco7794 http://www.geocities.com/bronco7794 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Memory upgrade

2000-08-24 Thread Miki
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:53:01 +0200 From: "Miki" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Memory upgrade Hi David. They must have given you a 8MB RAM module instead of a 16MB module. I don't tink so. The P/N is correct and the QC code of RAM is the same of the QC reported on packaging. Windows hangs