Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Hello everybody,
I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able to
connect to their own virtual machines via VNC. Is there any way to do so?
The VNC authentication
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Hello everybody,
I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able to
connect to their own virtual machines
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Hello everybody,
I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able to
connect to their own virtual machines
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:28:51PM -0400, Hany Fahim wrote:
Hey Daniel,
Here is the output of 'xm list' from both machines:
I wanted the 'xm info' output actually
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o-
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
What about the VNC password?
That's per-VM, isn't it?
That is true by I don't really consider VNC password to be useful. It is
utterly insecure. ...
Garry Dolley wrote:
With KVM/QEMU, you can set a VNC password per VM.
But I think it is either/or though; you
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Hello everybody,
I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Hello everybody,
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200,
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:45:43AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:39PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
This patch is purely re-factoring without any functional changes
to make way for the next patch.
The main thing achieved by the refactoring is that we now have
easier access to the parenthesised string that KVM folks seem
to
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
The KVM version string can be one of the following:
- qemu-kvm-x.y.z in stable releases
- kvm-XX for kvm versions up to kvm-85
- qemu-kvm-devel-XX for kvm version kvm-86 and later
There are only a few of places where
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:50:25PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
I've been working quite extensively with kvm on CentOS 5.3 lately.
If you are interested in the latest rpm of kvm-kmod-2.6.30-rc8,
qemu-kvm-0.10.5 and libvirt-0.6.4 you can temporary
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:28:00AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
This patch adds a new function virFindFileInPath() and uses it to find
where a binary lives in the PATH environment variable. Using this, we
can dynamically find where utility functions exist (and if they even
exists). So such we
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
ACK, though the 'is_kvm' flag is a little redundant, since it is
implied by kvm_version being != 0.
Nope, kvm_version won't be available after kvm-85 unless we start
parsing qemu-kvm-devel-86.
The reason I didn't do that is that
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:14 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
..
The test program is only built if WITH_QEMU is defined, so ...
...
this source file conditional is redundant.
...
And can kill this dummy main() too
I didn't dream this up myself, you know ... take a look at
qemuxml2argvtest
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:23:27PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:14 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
..
The test program is only built if WITH_QEMU is defined, so ...
...
this source file conditional is redundant.
...
And can kill this dummy main() too
I
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:39PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
This patch is purely re-factoring without any functional changes
to make way for the next patch.
The main thing achieved by the refactoring is that we now have
easier access to the parenthesised string that KVM folks seem
to
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
The KVM version string can be one of the following:
- qemu-kvm-x.y.z in stable releases
- kvm-XX for kvm versions up to kvm-85
- qemu-kvm-devel-XX for kvm version kvm-86 and later
Any chance to secure an API in the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:41PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
---
src/qemu_conf.c| 10 +-
src/qemu_conf.h|6 ++
tests/Makefile.am |9 ++-
tests/qemuhelpdata/kvm-74
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:53:15PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
The KVM version string can be one of the following:
- qemu-kvm-x.y.z in stable releases
- kvm-XX for kvm versions up to kvm-85
- qemu-kvm-devel-XX for
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 15:49 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
+#define QEMU_VERSION_STRQEMU PC emulator version
+#define KVM_VER_PREFIX (kvm-
+
+static int qemudParseHelpStr(const char *help,
+ unsigned int *flags,
+
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 15:53 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
The KVM version string can be one of the following:
- qemu-kvm-x.y.z in stable releases
- kvm-XX for kvm versions up to kvm-85
- qemu-kvm-devel-XX for kvm
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:20:08PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:18:14PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
---
src/node_device_conf.c |5 +
src/node_device_conf.h |1 +
src/node_device_hal.c |1 +
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 05:31:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There are currently far too many cases where a correct URI returns an
generic 'failed to connect to hypervisor' error message. This gives the
user no idea why they could not connect. Of particular importance is
that they
Hello,
if the guest is powered off and I run the following command to attach a
CD-ROM
virsh attach-disk QEmu-fedora-i686-3 myCDROM.iso hdc --driver file --type
cdrom --mode readonly
I got error:
libvir: QEMU error : internal error cannot attach device on inactive domain
Is it a requirement
2009/6/10 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org:
This patch adds a new function virFindFileInPath() and uses it to find
where a binary lives in the PATH environment variable. [...]
+/*
+ * Finds a requested file in the PATH env. e.g.:
+ * kvm-img will return /usr/bin/kvm-img
+ *
+ * You must
My apologies. Here it is:
Xen 3.3:
[r...@node1 ~]# xm info
host : node1
release: 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5xen
version: #1 SMP Thu May 7 11:51:15 EDT 2009
machine: i686
nr_cpus: 2
nr_nodes : 1
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:13:17PM -0400, Hany Fahim wrote:
My apologies. Here it is:
Xen 3.3:
[r...@node1 ~]# xm info
total_memory : 3063
free_memory: 128
node_to_cpu: node0:0-1
node_to_memory : node0:128
xen_major : 3
xen_minor
Thanks Daniel,
Is it fair to assume this fix may appear in the next release of libvirt?
Hany
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:13:17PM -0400, Hany Fahim wrote:
My apologies. Here it is:
Xen 3.3:
[r...@node1 ~]# xm
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:50:25PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
I've been working quite extensively with kvm on CentOS 5.3 lately.
If you are interested in the latest rpm of kvm-kmod-2.6.30-rc8,
qemu-kvm-0.10.5
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:17:06PM +0200, Gerrit Slomma wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:50:25PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
I've been working quite extensively with kvm on CentOS 5.3 lately.
If you are
Hi,
I have libvirt 0.6.4 running kvm instances on a headless server.
I'm using virt-manager 0.7.0 to manage them. In the past, I would SSH
in and run virt-manager as root. Since running GTK apps as root is no
good, I've switched to policykit authentication. By default, the
libvirt policy only
32 matches
Mail list logo
