Re: [libvirt] Plan for next release(s)

On Dec 1, 2016 6:12 AM, "Andrea Bolognani" wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 21:53 -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > > P.S. to Andrea - I will write a NEWS file entry, but I guess that can be > > safely pushed after Daniel freezes :-) > > You better! ;) Posted last night. I'm not

Re: [libvirt] Plan for next release(s)

On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 21:53 -0500, Laine Stump wrote: [...] > it was too late in  > the day to have a discussion with him about his question here: >  > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-November/msg01204.html >  > He didn't give a NACK for putting that function in now (rather than 

Re: [libvirt] Plan for next release(s)

Planning the release before flying, i.e. before you can do anything my bad I was late. Patches 1 and 2 can't seem to be able to introduce regressions. The meat is really into patches 3 and 4. if you and others feel confident about those 2 then have the series pushed between rc1 and rc2, that

Re: [libvirt] Plan for next release(s)

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:06:41PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > I'm late so I think that if we don't want to slip too much > the best would be to enter freeze tomorrow (Tuesday) then have RC2 > around Thursday and a release over the week-end. > > That said they are supposed to mess with my

Re: [libvirt] Plan for next release(s)

On 11/28/2016 03:06 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I'm late so I think that if we don't want to slip too much the best would be to enter freeze tomorrow (Tuesday) then have RC2 around Thursday and a release over the week-end. Are you saying you want to freeze tomorrow *morning* your time (ie.

[libvirt] Plan for next release(s)

I'm late so I think that if we don't want to slip too much the best would be to enter freeze tomorrow (Tuesday) then have RC2 around Thursday and a release over the week-end. That said they are supposed to mess with my internet tomorrow morning and I'm travelling till the end of the week, but