lawyer says before I push this further.
I believe I have until the last wednesday of the month before the
board meets to review the APOSSL.
cheers
dave
At 12:43 AM -0500 9/3/02, Russell Nelson wrote:
dave sag writes:
We state
4. The term pronoic should be used to endorse
At 5:23 PM -0500 5/3/02, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
in pseudocode
clause 4
if (haveNoPermissionToUseterm(pronoic))) {
if (useterm(pronoic)) {
noProblem();
} else {
notInTheSpiritOfIt();
}
} else {
At 9:48 AM -0500 6/3/02, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
APOSSL is a BSD style licence save for the following special points.
* the name of the software should not include pronoic.org or Pronoic Ltd.
That makes it like the Apache license, I think.
that's fine.
* the software should
last summer we wrote
some highly pronoic code
now just needs licence
VOTE yes to APOSSL
cheers
dave
At 9:25 AM -0800 6/3/02, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting dave sag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* the software should be described as being pronoic unless you ask
for permission to use the term pronoic
well this is way off topic but
At 3:04 PM -0500 6/3/02, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
I wrote:
Here is the response I would give you about OSI approval
for your license.
Your request will be rejected is your request will be rejected.
nice try but quines make sense. your response makes
Hi OSSL experts,
In my earlier posts to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I failed to
follow protocol and snagged myself on a couple of silly
misunderstandings. For this I apologise.
I have now followed from the list at
http://www.opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.html and hope that
this meets with
okay, sorry to be a pedant. this will be the last post on this OT
thread from me.
At 4:27 PM -0500 6/3/02, Matthew C. Weigel wrote:
On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 03:41 p, dave sag wrote:
nice try but quines make sense. your response makes no sense.
He made a small mistake: what he meant
Hi Forrest,
I think you have missed the finer points of the APOSSL comments inline below
At 11:24 AM -0500 5/3/02, Forrest J Cavalier III wrote:
snip
This is not a Free software license because clause 4 requires
promotion of derivatives I should be free to create a derivative
and keep it
III wrote:
dave sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, in part
Clause 4 does NOT require promition of derivatives at all. Should you
never obtain written permission, you never need endorse anything.
4. The names Pronoic, or pronoic.org must be used to endorse and
promote products derived from
At 12:37 PM -0500 5/3/02, Forrest J Cavalier III wrote:
pronoic is a word (albeit a made up word) meaning the opposite of
paranoic it is also a name, but so is apple, and netscape and
apache they can use their name in their own licences
Undefined words no place in legal documents
At 1:47 PM -0500 5/3/02, John Cowan wrote:
dave sag wrote:
Clause 4 does NOT require promition of derivatives at all Should
you never obtain written permission, you never need endorse
anything
# 4 The names Pronoic, or pronoicorg must be used to endorse and
# promote products derived from
Hi,
I would like to discuss the place for a licence like the APOSSL among
its peers.
The APOSSL is a licence whose goal is to encourage people to consider
being pronoic; believing in that feeling that forces are conspiring
to make life better.
This is manifest in the way software is
At 2:39 PM -0500 5/3/02, Forrest J Cavalier III wrote:
the key here is the qualifying 'before obtaining written permission'
should you NEVER obtain written permission you never need endorse
anything
Huh?
How does a court of law distinguish someone who will never
obtain permission from
At 2:36 PM -0300 5/3/02, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
I agree with your interpretation.
The text states clearly that you MUST use it, unless you get permission
for not using it.
this clause has been revised to
* 4. The term pronoic should be used to endorse and promote products derived
*from
At 3:55 PM -0500 5/3/02, Matthew C Weigel wrote:
On Tuesday, March 5, 2002, at 02:45 p, dave sag wrote:
because it puts faith in individuals and empowers them OSS is
pronoic in nature because you can simply express a need for tools
and within a
Then I don't understand the need for a 'pronoic
15 matches
Mail list logo
