Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on why standard licenses?

2014-04-30 Thread Nuno Brito
Note that the GPL is one of the least-understood licenses around, even by some of its supporters who make the most outrageous claims about linking. :-) From professional experience I see some non-GPL supporters top the charts in outrageous claims about GPL and linking. A particularly

Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license.

2014-04-30 Thread Buck Golemon
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Gervase Markham g...@mozilla.org wrote: On 23/04/14 16:59, Buck Golemon wrote: and another package's license says modified versions cannot contain additional attribution requirements. I don't know of any licenses which say that. Can you point

[License-discuss] Open source attribution

2014-04-30 Thread William Cheung
If I am developing a commercial software that is invoking an open source platform that has Apache 2.0 licence, and that open source platform uses other open source libraries or platforms, in the attribution of the open source platform, do I need to include all attributions of the open source