Thanks to all those who responded to this query. I should
have cc'd David on the original posting, so folks could have
followed up with him directly. I have forwarded your
replies to him.
Seth
Seth Johnson wrote:
(Forwarded from C-FIT Content Control Outreach discussion
list)
To OSI License Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribers,
From: Max Privus [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Let's say that the copyright display had to appear above any other
windows on the screen for 1/10th of a second per the cumulative number
of copies distributed by the licensee. Under this formula
[ Please discuss this license. -russ ]
1.
http://enetwizard.sourceforge.net/license.html
2.
My license is loosely based upon the Artistic License and the PHP
License http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt.
The Artistic License is most suitable to my wishes because I wish to
maintain some
I believe that the same legal effect can be obtained by using the
Academic Free License. Have you considered it?
The terms derivative work and combined work are defined in 17 USC
ยง101.
/Larry Rosen
-Original Message-
From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
At 02:21 30/08/2002 -0400, Robert Samuel White wrote:
- The name of the Copyright Holder may not be used to endorse or promote
products derived from this Package without specific prior written
permission from the Copyright Holder.
- The names eNetwizard and eNetwizard Content Application Server
Colin Percival scripsit:
I may be wrong here, but isn't this covered by trademark, not copyright,
law?
Only if eNetWizard is in fact a trademark, which may not be the case.
Even if one is not in trade, one may wish to avoid confusion
between one's own software and someone else's.
--
eNetWizard may not be a registered trademark, but it certainly seems as
if it is being used as a common law trademark -- and that's good enough
to get protection. /Larry Rosen
-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:47 AM
To:
Lawrence E. Rosen scripsit:
eNetWizard may not be a registered trademark, but it certainly seems as
if it is being used as a common law trademark -- and that's good enough
to get protection. /Larry Rosen
My understanding is that something can only be a trademark if it is
used in trade:
To OSI License Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribers,
From: Robert Samuel White [EMAIL PROTECTED],
http://enetwizard.sourceforge.net/license.html
Your reasoning behind using this license is quite good. The license is
both fair and equitable, and is compliant with the Open Source
9 matches
Mail list logo
