Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-12 Thread John Cowan
Tzeng, Nigel H. scripsit:

 Frankly, if you aren't going to tackle the categorization issue then I'd
 just update the links to insure they are accurate and leave it alone
 because you're going to have contention over what belongs in that list of
 popular, widely used or have strong communities on the revised landing
 page.

Okay, you're against the change; the rest is off-topic for this thread.

-- 
BALIN FUNDINUL  UZBAD KHAZADDUMUco...@ccil.org
BALIN SON OF FUNDIN LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss


Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-12 Thread Lawrence Rosen
Count my vote as NO for the same reason that Nigel gave. 

Count me also as frustrated that OSI continues to silence the arguments
against your license categorizations!

/Larry

Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw  Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com)
3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482
Office: 707-485-1242


-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:co...@mercury.ccil.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 10:40 AM
To: license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize
the OSI licensing page [revisited]

Tzeng, Nigel H. scripsit:

 Frankly, if you aren't going to tackle the categorization issue then 
 I'd just update the links to insure they are accurate and leave it 
 alone because you're going to have contention over what belongs in 
 that list of popular, widely used or have strong communities on the 
 revised landing page.

Okay, you're against the change; the rest is off-topic for this thread.

-- 
BALIN FUNDINUL  UZBAD KHAZADDUMUco...@ccil.org
BALIN SON OF FUNDIN LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss


Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-12 Thread Tzeng, Nigel H.
Incorrect.  The only part I'm specifically against is the section:

The following OSI-approved licenses are popular, widely used, or have
strong communities:

[Insert the current list of popular/widely used/strong community
licenses]

The reason I am opposed to this specific part is because in my opinion it
is PART OF the categorization issue.  That itself cannot be made
off-topic unless someone is inclined to pull shenanigans.

I don't believe this to be the case but the inclusion of this section into
the proposal changes it from a simple small edit to the website into
something more, ESPECIALLY with the suggestion that the alphabetical list
could safely be done away with.

Given the issues with categorization the more neutral position would be to
ONLY retain the alphabetical list.


On 11/12/12 1:39 PM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:

Tzeng, Nigel H. scripsit:

 Frankly, if you aren't going to tackle the categorization issue then I'd
 just update the links to insure they are accurate and leave it alone
 because you're going to have contention over what belongs in that list
of
 popular, widely used or have strong communities on the revised landing
 page.

Okay, you're against the change; the rest is off-topic for this thread.

-- 
BALIN FUNDINUL  UZBAD KHAZADDUMUco...@ccil.org
BALIN SON OF FUNDIN LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss


Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-11 Thread Luis Villa
Happy to take suggestions on the in essence part- trying to capture
the basics in one sentence.

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote:
 2. REVISE /LICENSES/ : The Open Source Licensing page (replacing the
 current http://opensource.org/licenses/)  would say (hopefully all
 changes self-explanatory):

 
 Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the Open Source
 Definition[link] - in essence, they allow software to be used,
 modified, and redistributed without restriction.

 I don't agree with the in essence part.

 * In the longer term, once Drupal is upgraded, it will likely make
 sense to generate http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical and
 http://opensource.org/licenses/category programatically, rather than
 through the current manual listing, which is of course error-prone.
 (Some people have suggested doing away with the alphabetical list
 altogether, which I personally would be fine with.)

 I've actually found the alphabetical list useful at times, FWIW.

 - Richard

 ___
 License-discuss mailing list
 License-discuss@opensource.org
 http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss


Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-11 Thread Gwyn Murray
Seconding Richard's comments regarding the usefulness of the alphabetical list 
here.

G.
On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:

 On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote:
 2. REVISE /LICENSES/ : The Open Source Licensing page (replacing the
 current http://opensource.org/licenses/)  would say (hopefully all
 changes self-explanatory):
 
 
 Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the Open Source
 Definition[link] - in essence, they allow software to be used,
 modified, and redistributed without restriction. 
 
 I don't agree with the in essence part. 
 
 * In the longer term, once Drupal is upgraded, it will likely make
 sense to generate http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical and
 http://opensource.org/licenses/category programatically, rather than
 through the current manual listing, which is of course error-prone.
 (Some people have suggested doing away with the alphabetical list
 altogether, which I personally would be fine with.) 
 
 I've actually found the alphabetical list useful at times, FWIW.
 
 - Richard
 
 ___
 License-discuss mailing list
 License-discuss@opensource.org
 http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss