Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-03-11 Thread wwp
Hello Mark, On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:47:49 -0500 Mark Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey wwp, > I just tried that patch. It's exactly what I needed. Has it been accepted > > into the mainline? > > Thanks for the speedy response, sorry I couldn't try it out sooner to let > you know wh

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-03-10 Thread Jon Keating
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:47:49 -0500, Mark Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey wwp, > I just tried that patch. It's exactly what I needed. Has it been accepted > into the mainline? Yeah.. sometime last month it was commited and had a fix as well. Jon -

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-03-10 Thread Mark Richards
Hey wwp, I just tried that patch. It's exactly what I needed. Has it been accepted into the mainline? Thanks for the speedy response, sorry I couldn't try it out sooner to let you know what I thought. Mark On February 15, 2005 12:07 pm, wwp wrote: > Hello Mark, Jon, > > > I've made a minima

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-16 Thread Mark Richards
wwp wrote: Also it seems none of my contacts can see me as online even though I'm not invisible (I try switching in and out of invisible mode). For icq contacts I'm seen as offline but they can msg me, for AIM contacts they get an error message when they try to msg me (the message says i'm off

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-15 Thread wwp
Hello Mark, Jon, I've made a minimalist patch that does what we planned: - add support for a command-line switch: -D (also modifies the usage text) if such switch is passed (for instance: licq -p qt-gui -- -D): - the dock icon group box that contains the dock icon settings are greyed in the op

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-14 Thread wwp
Hello Jon On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:26:17 +0900 Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On February 12, 2005 06:26 pm, wwp wrote: > > > IMO the smallest footprint patch would be to add a command-line switch > > > to DISable the dockicon feature. > > > > > > Let consider that the dockicon use is

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-14 Thread Jon Keating
> On February 12, 2005 06:26 pm, wwp wrote: > > IMO the smallest footprint patch would be to add a command-line switch to > > DISable the dockicon feature. > > > > Let consider that the dockicon use is set in the user's licq config, the > > user just has to call licq w/ this extra command-line argu

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-12 Thread Mark Richards
Disabling the icon would work for me; though ideally there would be an option for enabling the icon if it's not in the gui as well, but I can live with just one or the other. It's important that the disabling musn't write to the configuration file. This isn't a critical issue, obviously, so

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-12 Thread wwp
Hello Jon, Mark, On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:12:00 +0900 Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:16:58 -0500, Mark Richards > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I compile both the kde and qt plugins, and would be happy if there were > > some way to enable the icon JUST for KDE and

Re: [Licq-devel] Feature question or request:

2005-02-12 Thread Jon Keating
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:16:58 -0500, Mark Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I compile both the kde and qt plugins, and would be happy if there were some > way to enable the icon JUST for KDE and disable it JUST for QT as well. But > the best solution might be to provide a command-line param tha