[Lift] Re: Where to add demos/examples

Heiko, Please see here: http://is.gd/w5SB We've talked before on the committers list about renaming sites to examples or such, so I see no reason why putting any working example you want in there. POC would probably be a different matter... If its not working code, host it on your own github

[Lift] Re: Where to add demos/examples

On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Heiko, Please see here: http://is.gd/w5SB +1 We've talked before on the committers list about renaming sites to examples or such, so I see no reason why putting any working example you want in there. POC

[Lift] Re: Where to add demos/examples

Oh dear, sorry didn't realize I was butting in on committers talk. On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Heiko, Please see here: http://is.gd/w5SB +1

[Lift] Re: Where to add demos/examples

On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Your not - dont worry ;-) Heiko posted this to the main list because committers talk is only scheduling related stuff. Everything else is out in the open. If folks think that the examples should go someplace else,

[Lift] Re: Where to add demos/examples

With that being said, we're a very vocal bunch... the top posters to this list on any given month are committers... so we just can't shut up :-) Guilty as charged! lol. I think thats a real positive thing though - it means lots of community members get lots of help / talk / general

[Lift] Re: how to add object into session scope in lift

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Andrew Scherpbier and...@scherpbier.orgwrote: The Getting Started document got me hooked on Lift. :-) I guess I'll report my struggles from there. I don't know if what I did is typical. After actually running the two examples from the Getting Started

[Lift] objet vs class for snippets

Guys, I noticed that the internal lift snippets (msgs et al) have been moved to objects rather than classes - there are obvious benefits performance wise for this, but what should we be supplying to new- comers as the de-facto snippet implementation style? I know the answer is unlikely to be

[Lift] scalajpa 1.1

Question for Derek my jpa 1.1-SNAPSHOT version seems to have disappeared from the maven repo to be replaced with 1.1 But at the same time now I've done a maven clean it looks like RequestVarEM doesn't exist any more. I just got the source from git and this seems to be the case. So what do I do

[Lift] Re: scalajpa 1.1

My apologies. We had to move RequestVarEM to the lift-jpa module in order to fix a circular dependency that was preventing Lift 1.1-M1 from going out. If you're using Lift 1.0 then you should really be using ScalaJPA 1.0. Otherwise, you need to use the lift-jpa module instead of scalajpa with the

[Lift] Lift 1.1 M1 question

I'm at early stages of a fairly big project at the moment and mainly working in my domain model. Is M1 safe to use, since I doubt we'll get onto serious UI stuff for at least a month and production is likely 2-3 months after that. Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 M1 question

Tim, .m1 is indeed stable to use, go right ahead :) Cheers, Timothy On 02/05/2009 16:50, TSP tim.pig...@optrak.co.uk wrote: I'm at early stages of a fairly big project at the moment and mainly working in my domain model. Is M1 safe to use, since I doubt we'll get onto serious UI stuff

[Lift] buttons and textbox

Lifted, i'm putting together a little lift-based testharness in which to evaluate various solutions to the challenge Martin posted recently regarding scalable abstractions for a little lambda interpreter. You can get a copy of the app here http://svn.biosimilarity.com/src/open/rlambda/trunk/.