I got that list of commands wrong, what I typed, was
git clone g...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git
git branch wip-ol-immu
git checkout wip-ol-immu
git push origin wip-ol-immu
When I do a git branch -a, I get two wip-ol-immu
master
* wip-ol-immu
origin/1.0_maint
origin/HEAD
origin/master
Oliver,
But that's perfect! What's your problem?
There is one LOCAL wip-ol-immu branch and one REMOTE. That's how it is
expected to be for a branch you pushed.
Heiko
2009/5/29 Oliver Lambert olambo...@gmail.com
I got that list of commands wrong, what I typed, was
git clone
I have a problem with breaking a build on my first attempt of working with
git. I'm happy if I haven't, but what was concerning me was in the included
image (the network line looks like wip-ol-immu is directly next to master,
rather than on a separate branch - if this is normal, Im happy)
On Fri,
Oliver,
I very briefly looked on your code and I saw that you have your own
validator there. How would that play with the existent validattors
that Record has where each field has a list of :
type ValidationFunction = MyType = Box[Node]
Note that current MetaRecord's validator after evaluating
Hm, never looked at those images before. But I guess it is OK.
Heiko
2009/5/29 Oliver Lambert olambo...@gmail.com
I have a problem with breaking a build on my first attempt of working with
git. I'm happy if I haven't, but what was concerning me was in the included
image (the network line
I'm aware of S.error and my ValidationError uses it when I'm ready to show
errors. I've briefly looked at the ValidationFunction and the thing I might
stumble on is the errorType which I rely on.
I may be able to refactor the code to use List[FieldError] as I don't think
I rely on errorType at
I see ... still the question remains. What are we going to do with two
validators? I'd like to understand the principles of your addition
(... I know I should have dig into the code but I don't have much time
now).
I'd like to understand as I said previously if we have redundant
validators or
Oliver,
There are detailed instructions on the committer mailing list as to
how to create a remote branch for lift. For reference, I include them
here (originally from Mr Weir, so credit to him for being the git
master!):
**Creating a Remote Branch**
1. Create the remote branch
git push origin
Are there any performance implications considering closures vs annotations?
Agreed that closures are more lift like however.
Cheers, Tim
On 29/05/2009 10:21, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that would be really good. But I'd rather not use annotations.
Personally I find
We use the committer list to discuss process orientated things like
when we are going to do a release, issue management, who's working on
what tasks etc etc. Its a private - committer only group that is not
publicly viewable.
I'll touch base with you off list :-)
Cheers, Tim
On May 29, 12:35
I will try to send one, But Google API was failing while trying to load banner.
Google just released those api's.
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: liftweb@googlegroups.com [mailto:lift...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Narayanaswamy, Mohan
Sent: 28 May 2009 00:32
To: Lift
Subject:
Hi Marius,
To try and answer your question, I had to go and look at the Record code in
more detail. I hadn't recently written the Binder Validator, so it wasn't
designed to be
complementary to anything else (however, some of the naming and methodology
is very
similar in both sets of code).
What I
One thing I've been thinking about is optionally extending the Validator
Functions to also emit JavaScript that would perform the validation in the
browser... that would provide a seamless way to do client-side validation
for validators (e.g., min len, max len, regex) that only rely on client-side
No perf difference. The annotations are turned into the same exact closures.
2009/5/29 Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu:
Are there any performance implications considering closures vs annotations?
Agreed that closures are more lift like however.
Cheers, Tim
On 29/05/2009 10:21,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Narayanaswamy, Mohan
mohan.narayanasw...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
I will try to send one, But Google API was failing while trying to load
banner.
I suspect the problem is that Lift renders pages as strict XHTML and sets
the mime type of responses to be
I'd vote for closures. We use annotations for JPA because we have to, but
IMHO closures provide a nicer semantic approach because they syntactically
enclose the block where the action is occurring.
Derek
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jonas Bonér jbo...@gmail.com wrote:
No perf difference.
That would be very cool
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:37 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I've been thinking about is optionally extending the Validator
Functions to also emit JavaScript that would perform the validation in the
browser... that would provide a
I'll go for closures. Much simpler and less intrusive into Lift.
The current impl is based on Atomikos and Hibernate, I'll start with
pushing that in and we can make it pluggable later.
For example for Hibernate one need to add a line to the hibernate
config to register the
Committers can work on branches. The general solution is that if you are
working on something that is new or dangerous use a branch with the
following naming convention:
wip-name-feature
E.g. wip-tim-localization
Checkout the thread oliver started git ouch - I just posted instructions
there
Create a branch (see Oliver's recent thread) and push that. We cna look at
the branch before merging into master. Branching is preferred over forking
because it keeps things in the same stream.
Derek
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Jonas Bonér jbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll go for closures.
Thanks Tim and Derek.
I'll work in a branch. Simpler for me as well.
/Jonas
2009/5/29 Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu:
Committers can work on branches. The general solution is that if you are
working on something that is new or dangerous use a branch with the
following naming
This may be heresy on this list, but I'll ask it anyway. A general
point for discussion which I'm raising because the Lift Book mentions
AJAX early on in the PocketChange app.
How important is AJAX and all the associated Web 2.0 stuff to you and
to your projects? I'm quite happy without
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Jeremy Day jeremy@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have a slightly related question. I'm new to the list and a complete
newbie to Lift (having only discovered it a couple of days ago), so forgive
me for the potentially silly question. Can you use Lift with Flex
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Joe Wass j...@folktunefinder.com wrote:
This may be heresy on this list, but I'll ask it anyway. A general
point for discussion which I'm raising because the Lift Book mentions
AJAX early on in the PocketChange app.
How important is AJAX and all the
Appreciate you are a busy man David, but from a community perspective I
think it would be awesome if you could pour some of your brain into a
whitepaper on this subject your very right, its a key take away and an
important part of lifts ³sales pitch² as it were.
Cheers, Tim
On 29/05/2009
You can use Lift perfectly fine without Ajax, javaScript or even
cookies. If you're turning off cookies from the container relative
paths for links, forms etc. will be provided with JSESSIONID quantity
for you so you don't have to do anything. This is otherwise known as
URL rewriting. So you can
On Friday May 29 2009, Joe Wass wrote:
...
Have I missed the point of Lift entirely? Am I in a small minority?
Am I crazy?
Perhaps. Perhaps. Probably not (but who really knows?)
Seriously, my interest in Lift (and Grails before it—don't shoot me) is
in providing what I call BBIs
The thing that doesn't work, IIRC, is that application/xhtml+xml doesn't
allow document.write(). The Google code (foolishly, IMO) depends on
write() to write script elements to the page. For some things you can
work around it by simply removing the use of write and just adding the
script
I agree.
Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
I'd vote for closures. We use annotations for JPA because we have to,
but IMHO closures provide a nicer semantic approach because they
syntactically enclose the block where the action is occurring.
Derek
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jonas Bonér
Lift makes AJAX easy, but Lift has nothing to do with AJAX. Lift makes a
lot of things easy.
I've built half a dozen sites in Lift so far, with several more in the
works, and most of them use no AJAX at all.
That said, there is a lot to be said for AJAX when used properly. I
think you're way
The ant target, runappserver, is an ant macro included with the gae
sdk.
It does the same thing that dev_appserver does. The problem I'm having
is that the HelloWorld.howdy snippet is suppose to return
spana href=?login=Log in/a/span
but it doesn't. The only thing displayed is liHomeli
I can
Forget that last post. I got it working. I had template tag error
in my code.
Glenn...
On May 28, 1:39 pm, denew de...@clear.net.nz wrote:
I'm using maven for builds, so I can't help with your Ant process, but
you need to start the appengine with something like:
Is it real to create form with dependent field? Suppose whe have two
select boxes: for the country and for the city. It would be quite
good, if country selection trigger updating of the cities list.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
David,
i didn't realize the LiftOff conflicted with a long-planned participation in
a Guitar Craft course. i will definitely send good will and good wishes to
the community. i'm certain you guys will have much too much fun. Maybe i can
organize some kind of functional-computing-and-the-web event
Wow, that I would very much like to see... using for comprehensions
for transactions!
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 May 2009, at 23:54, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jonas,
i applaud the effort. i agree with DPP sentiments regarding
annotations. That said,
Joe,
i love questions like this: 'what are the real requirements?'
i have no particular interest in technology like AJAX -- except as a means
to an end. i need to be able to build sites that are the web's equivalent of
CSCW apps from the late 80s/early 90s. In the web apps i'm working on users
I, too, would like to see Transactions be monadic.
--j
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Meredith Gregory
lgreg.mered...@gmail.comwrote:
Jonas,
i applaud the effort. i agree with DPP sentiments regarding annotations.
That said, i feel pretty comfortable that transactions fit entirely in a
Rats.
Meredith Gregory wrote:
David,
i didn't realize the LiftOff conflicted with a long-planned
participation in a Guitar Craft course. i will definitely send good will
and good wishes to the community. i'm certain you guys will have much
too much fun. Maybe i can organize some kind
+30
So many pluses in fact, that we are already experimenting with this concept
at work. Unfortunately, the source may not be openable. I'd be more than
willing to contribute to an open-source JTA monadic library.
for( tx - context) {
//Do stuff
if(somethingBad)
39 matches
Mail list logo
