I've looked at your code and it looks good - im not a couch user, but the
implementation looks good to me.
Push to master ;-)
Cheers, Tim
On 27 Jan 2010, at 16:31, Marius wrote:
I'd strongly encourage you to do it. I was planning to work on it but
I never seem to find slots for it :(
If
IMO, these are separate concerns. lift-imaging is purely for image manipulation
and caching etc does not belong there.
Cheers, Tim
On 28 Jan 2010, at 20:25, Strom wrote:
By caching I mean like EHCache, where you serve an image from the
cache (some folder on the file system) instead of
Ross,
I've just got back from Italy... taken a look at your code and it looks good to
me. Go for it :)
Cheers, Tim
On 25 Jan 2010, at 19:24, David Pollak wrote:
Ross,
Thanks for this contribution!!
I don't have the bandwidth to review it but would encourage folks from the
community
Hi,
I am building an app which needs some static data added whenever we rebuild
the database. I would like to do that using the mapper api but it looks like
I need to do it table by table by overriding dbAddTable. I would prefer to
do this in one place for the whole model, preferably using the
On 31/01/2010, at 2:57 PM, David Pollak wrote:
Scala is very, very version sensitive.
So I've read (at least from 2.7.x to 2.8).
Until there's a version of the Scala
plugin that's built with Scala 2.8 Beta1, you are going to see lots of
subtle and not so subtle issues.
Yeah I'm prepared
On 31/01/2010, at 3:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
Two possible reasons for the J that come to mind are (1) the project lost
its Scala nature; add it again via the context menu;
I had actually tried that. It still had the nature - so I tried removing and
readding. But that made no difference
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/issue/316
by using getColumnLabel I can chose between a real column name or a
alias name by the AS clause in SQL. with the getColumnName method I
don't have a choice
I wrap the DB.performQuery result to a map list in my app, and this
really hurt me.
--
You
Looks like there is also a bug with pagination on List All page. It
seems going forward with Next is fine, though I haven't tried going
all the way to the end. But I can't go back to the first page with
Previous. The farthest I can back to is second page. I'll have to
re-enter the List all to
You could in theory have some run task that just essentially executed
a bunch of mapper calls, but it sounds like you want more of a build
up and tear down approach a la:
http://code.google.com/p/scala-migrations/
Perhaps that is what you are after?
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 31, 11:59 am, Channing
I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:
Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
Welcome back, Tim!
I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in.
Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh.
Cheers, Indrajit
On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:
Running
Thanks Indrajit :)
That was my thought also, running a top level mvn clean install on
280_port_refresh results in the stack trace below, yes.
Cheers, Tim
On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:07, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
Welcome back, Tim!
I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking
The output is fine. Curious to know what puzzled you in the output.
Can you please send me the output of mvn help:effective-pom for
lift-common?
Cheers, Indrajit
On 31/01/10 11:47 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
However, the dependency tree looks like:
[INFO]
Thanks! can you throw a ship it on the issue306 RB request for
documentation purposes? Also, if you feel like reviewing issue305
which it depends on while you're there... ;-)
-Ross
On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:56 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu
wrote:
Ross,
I've just got back
I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case. So
I am completely stumped now.
See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
(http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)
- IRC
On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
That does look interesting - reminds me of liquibase but being in Scala is
more useful.
I was hoping there was a way to do this under lift's framework so that I can
work with model objects. Your idea of using a run task may be the way.
Would it make sense to have a hook in schemifier that is
Looking around MetaMapper and Schemifier, it looks like I could override
BaseMetaMapper.afterSchemifier to do what i want although I would need to
nominate a mapper to do this work (User would suffice).
I'll try it...
Timothy Perrett wrote:
You could in theory have some run task that just
Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case. So
I am completely stumped now.
See if you can
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Channing Walton channingwal...@mac.comwrote:
Looking around MetaMapper and Schemifier, it looks like I could override
BaseMetaMapper.afterSchemifier to do what i want although I would need to
nominate a mapper to do this work (User would suffice).
The
If you only initialize the database all at once, why not just put the code in
Boot?
-
Channing Waltonchanningwal...@mac.com wrote:
Looking around MetaMapper and Schemifier, it looks like I could override
BaseMetaMapper.afterSchemifier to do what i want
OK, so that really didn't help. How is it building OK on hudson?! That
makes no sense at all. I guess for the moment i'll just have to work
with the JARs built by hudson.
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 31, 8:44 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to
The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0 Beta1.
The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.
This is seriously suboptimal.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Im just doing a
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
If you only initialize the database all at once, why not just put the code
in Boot?
Because if the code's in Boot, it will be executed every time the code is
run.
-
Channing
Yes I could do that - not sure what I need to do with connections etc to make
that happen though :wistle:
Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
If you only initialize the database all at once, why not just put the code
in Boot?
-
Channing
Please do not open tickets without a discussion on this list first.
Please close the ticket and start a discussion.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Jarod Liu liuyuan...@gmail.com wrote:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/issue/316
by using getColumnLabel I can chose between a real column
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Lachlan Deck lachlan.d...@gmail.comwrote:
On 31/01/2010, at 2:57 PM, David Pollak wrote:
Scala is very, very version sensitive.
So I've read (at least from 2.7.x to 2.8).
For every single version of Scala. The way that traits are implemented
makes this
Hi All,
I've been chasing this one for a while and found a few posts dancing
around the edge, but so far I haven't seen any solid answer on it.
Most MappedTypeField's have auto generated form fields, including
Select elements if you override the correct method.
I was hoping MappedDateTime would
Ok, this one is a bit of a beginner question, but here goes anyway.
I've got a bunch of auto generated menus as part of my top level menu
(about 2 per model element) and it's starting to look pretty
cluttered.
What I want to do, is have a crud menu, then a sub element for every
model object, and
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote:
lift-mapper's MappedPassword has a method match_?, but PasswordField in
lift-record does not, and I can't see a way around using it since salt_i is
protected, other than subclassing PasswordField.
I think a match_? method
I'm doing okay with eclipse's completion on 2.7.7. It usually works when there
are no mismatched brackets etc. or else after closing reopening the editor. But
of course I seem to be in the minority. :)
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On
I thought there was an implicit in scope that said conditionally. :)
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
If you only initialize the database all at once, why not
I'm not sure what you're asking.
You want a List and Create submenu under each model without duplicate code?
-
The Travthe.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, this one is a bit of a beginner question, but here goes anyway.
I've got a bunch of auto generated menus as
I've implemented a JSON form similar to the one described in the Lift
book. I need two submit buttons, each triggering a different action.
So how to distinguish the submits? Unfortunately, the submit buttons
themselves are not taken into account for the transferred JSON so that
something like
ok cool, sounds like a plan!
bearfeeder wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Channing Walton
channingwal...@mac.comwrote:
Looking around MetaMapper and Schemifier, it looks like I could override
BaseMetaMapper.afterSchemifier to do what i want although I would need to
nominate a
Peter,
Please keep in mind the Lift IP policy. We don't pull from other
repositories nor do we accept patches. We'll have to do the Flot 0.6
ourselves.
Thanks,
David
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Peter Robinett pe...@bubblefoundry.comwrote:
Aaron, thanks so much for taking the
I'm more than happy to submit the patch under the Lift IP policy, but I
understand if you don't feel comfortable with that. And I can submit it
anyway that works for you. I'm just looking to help give back to everyone
that's helped me out. Albeit in a very, very small way.
Sent from my iPhone
On
I'm not sure what you're asking.
You want a List and Create submenu under each model without duplicate code?
Current menu tree is:
+ Home
+ Create Foo
+ List Foo
+ Create Bar
+ List Bar
+ Create Ork
+ List Ork
+ Some Business
+ Other Business
What I want is:
+Home
- Crud
- Foo
+
Does this work?
List(Foo, Bar).map{model: CRUDify =
Menu(Loc(...), model.menus: _*)
}
Not tested.
-
The Travthe.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what you're asking.
You want a List and Create submenu under each model without duplicate code?
Current
It seems like peter will take ownership of this and make it happen
ASAP so a patch / diff should not be needed.
Peter, please confirm when you will roll this in a branch and put it
on review board?
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 31 Jan 2010, at 22:48, Aaron Valade aval...@gmail.com
HI all,
first of all, I should present myself, as it's my first post in the
group: I'm Pere Villega, a Java developer living in Dublin and
learning Scala and Lift in my spare time.
As a good newbie, I'll start with an obvious question: I've been
reading the Lift book, and I got confused on the
david,
sorry, i closed the ticket. do you accept my proposal
On Feb 1, 5:06 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do not open tickets without a discussion on this list first.
Please close the ticket and start a discussion.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Jarod Liu
Hello,
This was considered later on a defect, and not a feature. To preserve
markup attributes in your bind use -% instead of -
thanks, although the -% is missing support for the .toForm, as it returns a
Box[NodeSeq]. And for % you need an Elem. Any ideas how to deal with that? :)
Yes Lift's JavaScript stuff is mostly used when returning Ajax
response. You can also use it to serve fictive *.js files and instead
of returning a js file content you can serve the request (using
LiftRules.dispatch) and the actual JS returns is produced by
composition of JsCmd-s. We actually do
43 matches
Mail list logo