[Lift] 1.1-M8 to 2.0-M1 behavior change

2010-01-17 Thread aw
I have this code: object Auth { def username = S.containerRequest.map( r = r.asInstanceOf [HTTPRequestServlet].req.getRemoteUser() ).openOr(UNKNOWN_USER) } The background is that I have my own Servlet Filter that performs authentication. It fits in the chain before the Lift Filter. For

Re: [Lift] 1.1: children of menu items do not appear

2010-01-16 Thread Tim Nelson
There was a bug that's been fixed. I suggest you use the newest version, which is 2.0-SNAPSHOT. 1.1 was renamed 2.0 last week. Tim On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Joachim A. wallaby.po...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I've been away from Lift for quite a time. At the moment I work on an old

Re: [Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2010-01-01 Thread Timothy Perrett
/liftweb/downloads) for both 1.1-M7 and Lift-1.1-M8-release. Both of them fail the build with the same error: C:\Users\mark\Library\Lift-1.1-M7\lift-modules\lift-jta\src\main\scala \net\liftweb\transaction\TransactionContext.scala:206: error: class TransactionContext needs to be abstract, since

[Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-31 Thread joseph hirn
Heiko, I just tried runtime scope and I get the same exception when recompiling a Scala file with jetty still running. Do you experience the same? org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Database may be already in use: Locked by another process. Possible solutions: close all other connection(s); use the

[Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-31 Thread joseph hirn
-0800 From: David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com To: liftwebliftweb@googlegroups.com Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8 ... read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift

[Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-31 Thread Java1Guy
I'm not quite understanding... I just got the zip files from the download page of the GitHub (http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/downloads) for both 1.1-M7 and Lift-1.1-M8-release. Both of them fail the build with the same error: C:\Users\mark\Library\Lift-1.1-M7\lift-modules\lift-jta\src\main\scala

[Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-30 Thread joseph hirn
? -- Jim On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:37:02AM -0800, David Pollak wrote: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:37:02 -0800 From: David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com To: liftwebliftweb@googlegroups.com Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8     The Lift Web Framework team is pleased

Re: [Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-29 Thread David Pollak
] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8 The Lift Web Framework team is pleased to announce the lift-1.1-M8 release! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

Re: [Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-28 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:37:02AM -0800, David Pollak wrote: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:37:02 -0800 From: David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com To: liftwebliftweb@googlegroups.com Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8 The Lift Web Framework team is pleased to announce the lift-1.1-M8

Re: [Lift] re: user_id has value, but get constraint exception of it being null, using JPA and Lift 1.1

2009-12-28 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
OK, I see something really odd here. The exception is complaining about a missing USER_ID column, but there's no such column in either insert statement: Hibernate: insert into users (firstName, lastName, username, id) values (?, ?, ?, ?) Hibernate: insert into address (addressLineOne, city,

[Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-28 Thread joseph hirn
get added a bit later? -- Jim On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:37:02AM -0800, David Pollak wrote: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:37:02 -0800 From: David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com To: liftwebliftweb@googlegroups.com Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8     The Lift Web Framework team

[Lift] Re: [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-27 Thread joseph hirn
@googlegroups.com Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8    The Lift Web Framework team is pleased to announce the lift-1.1-M8 release! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com

Re: [Lift] re: trying to get minimum needed for unit test to work using LIFT 1.1 and JPA

2009-12-23 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
This line is troubling: [PersistenceUnit: jpaweb] Unable to build EntityManagerFactory But I'm not sure why that would be happening and not throwing some sort of exception or logging. I'm not going to be around much over the holidays, but I can definitely help next week if you're still running

Re: [Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-18 Thread David Pollak
and it worked just fine. On Dec 18, 3:17 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Did you do an mvn clean compile? On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:27 AM, earthling_paul paul.ber...@gmail.com wrote: While compiling my samples with Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT I get

[Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-18 Thread earthling_paul
David, mvn clean compile worked. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more

[Lift] re: user_id has value, but get constraint exception of it being null, using JPA and Lift 1.1

2009-12-18 Thread James Black
Hello, I have struggled with this for a few hours and hopefully someone can see what I am doing wrong. Basically, I insert into users, I then select the user, I then set that in my address and try to insert and get an error that the user_id cannot be null, but it has a value. I am including the

[Lift] Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-17 Thread earthling_paul
While compiling my samples with Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT I get this Compiler- Error: [ERROR] D:\Projekte\TestProjects\hello-lift-11\src\main\scala\net \liftweb\hello\snippet\TD.scala:76: error: object creation impossible, since method doSync in trait AnyVarTrait of type [F](= F)F is not defined [INFO

Re: [Lift] Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-17 Thread David Pollak
Did you do an mvn clean compile? On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:27 AM, earthling_paul paul.ber...@gmail.comwrote: While compiling my samples with Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT I get this Compiler- Error: [ERROR] D:\Projekte\TestProjects\hello-lift-11\src\main\scala\net \liftweb\hello\snippet\TD.scala:76

[Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-17 Thread ngocdaothanh
, 2009 at 9:27 AM, earthling_paul paul.ber...@gmail.comwrote: While compiling my samples with Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT I get this Compiler- Error: [ERROR] D:\Projekte\TestProjects\hello-lift-11\src\main\scala\net \liftweb\hello\snippet\TD.scala:76: error: object creation impossible, since method

Re: [Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-17 Thread David Pollak
...@gmail.com wrote: While compiling my samples with Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT I get this Compiler- Error: [ERROR] D:\Projekte\TestProjects\hello-lift-11\src\main\scala\net \liftweb\hello\snippet\TD.scala:76: error: object creation impossible, since method doSync in trait AnyVarTrait

[Lift] Re: Problem in Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-12-17 Thread ngocdaothanh
, 3:17 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Did you do an mvn clean compile? On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:27 AM, earthling_paul paul.ber...@gmail.com wrote: While compiling my samples with Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT I get this Compiler- Error: [ERROR] D:\Projekte

[Lift] re: trying to get minimum needed for unit test to work using LIFT 1.1 and JPA

2009-12-17 Thread James Black
I am trying to test that my entities are working properly, but I get this at the end of the surefire output for the test: 1634 [main] INFO org.hibernate.cfg.annotations.CollectionBinder - Mapping collection: jblack.resumeapp.lift.model.Author.books - Book 1639 [main] INFO

Re: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-16 Thread Xuefeng Wu
Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8 The Lift Web Framework team is pleased to announce the lift-1.1-M8 release! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-15 Thread Oleg G.
I'm wondering about scala 2.8 compatibility, is it in or when is it planned? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-15 Thread Timothy Perrett
No, it is not in yet. This is currently on the 2_8_0 branch and will be in Lift 2.0 (Scala 2.8 keeps being put back) Cheers, Tim On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:57, Oleg G. wrote: I'm wondering about scala 2.8 compatibility, is it in or when is it planned? -- You received this message because

Re: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-15 Thread Jim McBeath
14, 2009 at 11:37:02AM -0800, David Pollak wrote: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:37:02 -0800 From: David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com To: liftweb liftweb@googlegroups.com Subject: [Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8 The Lift Web Framework team is pleased to announce the lift-1.1-M8 release

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-15 Thread DMB
Hmm. A word of warning - Netbeans 6.8 requires Scala 2.8. I found out the hard way. If anyone knows a workaround on how to make Netbeans 6.8 work with Lift, do share. On Dec 15, 3:16 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: No, it is not in yet. This is currently on the 2_8_0 branch

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-15 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
Then I guess you could use an older version of Netbeans, or the 2.8 branch despite its work-in-progress status (use git and build yourself). - DMBcombust...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm. A word of warning - Netbeans 6.8 requires Scala 2.8. I found out the hard way.

[Lift] 1.1-M7 basic archetype errors

2009-12-14 Thread glenn
The 1.1-M7 basic archetype in http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots doesn't have a dependency on lift-json and so compilation fails. Adding this dependency in the pom solves this. Also, shouldn't the pom use the SNAPSHOT repo rather than, or at least in addition to, releases? Glenn -- You

Re: [Lift] 1.1-M7 basic archetype errors

2009-12-14 Thread David Pollak
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM, glenn gl...@exmbly.com wrote: The 1.1-M7 basic archetype in http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots doesn't have a dependency on lift-json and so compilation fails. Adding this dependency in the pom solves this. Also, shouldn't the pom use the SNAPSHOT repo

[Lift] [ANN] Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-14 Thread David Pollak
The Lift Web Framework team is pleased to announce the lift-1.1-M8 release! Lift is an expressive and elegant framework for writing web applications. Lift stresses the importance of security, maintainability, scalability and performance while allowing for high levels of developer

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-14 Thread harryh
Huzzah! Welcome M8! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M8

2009-12-14 Thread Randinn
Very nice, great work guys! On Dec 15, 6:57 am, harryh har...@gmail.com wrote: Huzzah! Welcome M8! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: [Lift] Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta

2009-11-20 Thread David Pollak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: This is really funny this should crop up - I've been having a conversation at Devoxx about cluster / distributing Lift. David, one of the things i've been thinking is that it would be cool if we could potentially

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta

2009-11-20 Thread Timothy Perrett
HAHA - yup, thats exactly what I mean! There was work previously done on distributing with terracotta and it was fraught with problems and exception cases. What are your thoughts right now on serialisation (other than its a nightmare)? Cheers, Tim The only thing that is a little bit of a

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta

2009-11-20 Thread David Pollak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: HAHA - yup, thats exactly what I mean! There was work previously done on distributing with terracotta and it was fraught with problems and exception cases. What are your thoughts right now on serialisation (other

Re: [Lift] Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta

2009-11-19 Thread David Pollak
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:06 PM, jon jonhoff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Has anyone had any recent success with using Terracotta to share session state? I've tried playing around with a simple lift app (1.1-M7) and terracotta's sessions-configurator app. It doesn't just work, but I realized

Re: [Lift] Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta

2009-11-19 Thread Jonas Bonér
Hi Jon. Could you send me what you have so far and I'll try to take a look at it. I'm pretty choked right now so I can't give it too many cycles but I'll try to do my best :-) Mail it to me directly: my first name AT jonasboner.com /Jonas 2009/11/6 jon jonhoff...@gmail.com: Hi, Has anyone

[Lift] 1.1-SNAPSHOT In() with OrderBy mapper bug

2009-11-04 Thread jon
Hi, I just noticed OrderBy statements cause Inner selects to break in h2: I query such as: User.findAll(In(User.id, Dog.owner, OrderBy(Dog.name, Ascending)), MaxRows(5)) Produces: Message: org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Order by expression NAME must be in the result list in this case; SQL

[Lift] Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 less than 36 hours away

2009-11-03 Thread David Pollak
Folks, Lift 1.1 M7 is less than 36 hours away (barring some huge defect that folks uncover). It's time for everyone to do some testing of their code against SNAPSHOT. Specifically: - SNAPSHOT and M7 are compiled against Scala 2.7.7. Please update your build system and dependencies

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 less than 36 hours away

2009-11-03 Thread Neil.Lv
It sounds good, it's a good new for us! Congratulations , the M7 is coming ! Cheers, Neil On Nov 3, 10:05 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Lift 1.1 M7 is less than 36 hours away (barring some huge defect that folks uncover). It's time for everyone to do

[Lift] 1.1-M6 Mapped fields with dbColumnName always displaying defaultValue

2009-10-30 Thread Troy Noble
We are using Mapper with a legacy database with many columns that we are not allowed to rename in our database. For example CREATE_DATE for which we created the following seemingly simple mapped field in our model: object createDate extends MappedDateTime(this) { override def dbColumnName

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-27 Thread David Pollak
. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-27 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
:24 PM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems of synchronizing on a master/HEAD freeze) And it makes it more complex to figure out what to merge off master

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-27 Thread David Pollak
viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems of synchronizing on a master/HEAD freeze) And it makes it more complex to figure out what to merge off master, please

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-27 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems of synchronizing on a master/HEAD freeze) And it makes it more complex to figure out what to merge off master, please it means that testing against SNAPSHOT

[Lift] Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-26 Thread David Pollak
Folks, We are scheduled to release Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 on Wednesday November 4th. We would like to release M7 against Scala 2.7.7 final if EPFL's schedule can accommodate this. We are going into code-slush on Thursday October 29th (this means we're not going to make material changes

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-26 Thread Viktor Klang
Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems of synchronizing on a master/HEAD freeze) On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:18 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, We are scheduled to release Lift 1.1

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-26 Thread David Pollak
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.comwrote: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems of synchronizing on a master/HEAD freeze) And it makes it more complex to figure out what

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-26 Thread Viktor Klang
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:34 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.comwrote: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone 7 branch and deploy from that? (It'd eliminate the potential problems

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 Milestone 7

2009-10-26 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
Could someone fix #121 (loginRedirect using S.uri; not getting part after '?') - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.comwrote: Folks, may I suggest cutting a Lift 1.1 Milestone

[Lift] 1.1

2009-10-25 Thread jack
I have been using lift 1.0. What is the best way to upgrade to 1.1? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread Timothy Perrett
moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
: Can you post an example (complete file) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread Timothy Perrett
in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
] On Oct 15, 2009, at 5:04 PM, David Pollak wrote: Can you post an example (complete file) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com mailto:my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread Timothy Perrett
an example (complete file) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread Timothy Perrett
) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
(complete file) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread Timothy Perrett
, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http:// liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread David Pollak
perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
Could you please send me a pom.xml example for lift 1.1? Cheers, GA On Oct 16, 2009, at 4:28 PM, GA wrote: Why is it getting the 2.7.1 version in first place? The pom.xml is created by maven from the archetype and repository right? Is it perhaps some environment setup that I have or I

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread David Pollak
15, 2009, at 5:04 PM, David Pollak wrote: Can you post an example (complete file) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-16 Thread GA
at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread monty chen
That is great for lift 1.1. but I suggest to improve doc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinett
Hi David, That sounds like a great list, especially (in my case) the Record, lift-json, OAuth, and REST support. Peter Robinett On Oct 14, 11:27 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, I'd like to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain.  Here's my list

[Lift] error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread GA
Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Jonathan Ferguson
confident that EPFL will have a solid 2.8 rather than a 2.8 quickly followed by a 2.8.1. Cheers, Tim On 14 Oct 2009, at 22:27, David Pollak wrote: Folks, I'd like to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain. Here's my list: - Wizard working to the same quality that SiteMap

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Jacek Furmankiewicz
Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS and JAXB? Or are you planning to not use those existing stacks and replace them with something Scala/Lift-specific? I personally like both of them as they take care of a lot of plumbing transparently (.e.g. switching output from JSON to XML depending

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread GA
...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jacek Furmankiewicz jace...@gmail.comwrote: Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS and JAXB? Or are you planning to not use those existing stacks and replace them with something Scala/Lift-specific? This thread is the discussion of the what is going to

[Lift] Re: error: not found: type IdPK in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread David Pollak
an example (complete file) of something's not working? On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, GA my_li...@me.com wrote: Hello guys, I have a Lift project working perfectly in version 1.0, but when I moved it to Lift 1.1 I am having errors with the Modeler with the type IdPK. Any ideas? Thanks, GA

[Lift] What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-14 Thread David Pollak
Folks, I'd like to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain. Here's my list: - Wizard working to the same quality that SiteMap works - Record become the primary persistence vehicle in Lift - Lift runs on Scala 2.8 - Full support for Oracle and MS SQL Server - Integrate

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-14 Thread Timothy Perrett
:27, David Pollak wrote: Folks, I'd like to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain. Here's my list: Wizard working to the same quality that SiteMap works Record become the primary persistence vehicle in Lift Lift runs on Scala 2.8 Full support for Oracle and MS SQL Server

[Lift] Lift 1.1 must use Scala 2.8.x ?

2009-10-14 Thread Neil.Lv
Hi all, If i want to use the lift1.1 whether the scala version must greater than 2.8 ? My lift version is 2.7.4 now, so i must change to 2.8.x ? Thanks very much ! Cheers, Neil --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 must use Scala 2.8.x ?

2009-10-14 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
No On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Neil.Lv anim...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all,  If i want to use the lift1.1 whether the scala version must greater than 2.8 ?  My lift version is 2.7.4 now, so i must change to 2.8.x ?  Thanks very much ! Cheers,  Neil

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 must use Scala 2.8.x ?

2009-10-14 Thread Wilson MacGyver
no, if you are using the current milestone or snapshot, you'll see it's still using scala 2.7.x series. I don't think lift will switch to 2.8 anytime soon. too many changes and too many unknowns. I'm not even sure if scalatest compiles at this point with 2.8 snapshot. Or in short, let mvn take

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-14 Thread David Pollak
to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain. Here's my list: - Wizard working to the same quality that SiteMap works - Record become the primary persistence vehicle in Lift - Lift runs on Scala 2.8 - Full support for Oracle and MS SQL Server - Integrate lift-json

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 must use Scala 2.8.x ?

2009-10-14 Thread Atsuhiko Yamanaka
to make sure that Lift works well with 2.8.  Currently, there's a compiler error that makes compiling Lift against 2.8 impossible. Explicitly speaking, does it mean that Lift 1.1 will also run on scala 2.7._ ? I had guessed that Lift 1.1 will run only on scala 2.8, because it will require hard work

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 must use Scala 2.8.x ?

2009-10-14 Thread David Pollak
1.0.2 or 1.1-M5/6/SNAPSHOT. We will run against Scala 2.8 and we're working with the Scala team to make sure that Lift works well with 2.8. Currently, there's a compiler error that makes compiling Lift against 2.8 impossible. Explicitly speaking, does it mean that Lift 1.1 will also run

[Lift] 1.1-SNAPSHOT and Snippet problems?

2009-10-03 Thread Thomas Rampelberg
I just synced up to main this morning and now whenever I try and use one of my snippets, I'm getting the traceback below. Any hints on what I'm doing wrong? The snippet in question is just the basic Util.in/Util.out that the tutorial has you write. div class=column span-17 last

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT under Scala 2.8 with NetBeans and the Scala plugin

2009-09-05 Thread Stuart Roebuck
David, Thanks, that's very helpfully pulled me back from the abyss :-) Stuart On Sep 4, 11:28 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Lift does not yet compile under 2.8. I just had lunch with PaulP and will be working on a Lift branch that does work under 2.8, but it's going

[Lift] Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT under Scala 2.8 with NetBeans and the Scala plugin

2009-09-04 Thread Stuart Roebuck
Being on the bleeding edge again, I'm trying to do some Lift stuff using the nice new Scala plugin for NetBeans. However, this appears to require me to be working under the latest Scala 2.8 release. So, I have downloaded the Lift sources and built 1.1-SNAPSHOT under Scala 2.8. Everything

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT under Scala 2.8 with NetBeans and the Scala plugin

2009-09-04 Thread David Pollak
Lift does not yet compile under 2.8. I just had lunch with PaulP and will be working on a Lift branch that does work under 2.8, but it's going to be a little while before it all works (we need to get ScalaCheck working first and that's on one of Paul's branches). So, please use Lift with Scala

[Lift] 1.1-SNAPSHOT issue?

2009-08-26 Thread E. Biggs
Hi there, I just did a mvn -U jetty:run and my site that I know was working fine before is now broken with this error displayed in the browser for any url: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: schema_reference.4: Failed to read schema document 'http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/xhtml1-

[Lift] 1.1-SNAPSHOT broken in Google App Engine

2009-08-16 Thread Mark Tye
First, I want to say that I'm really impressed with Lift. It's a pleasure to work with (now that I've figured it out) and it keeps getting better. I'm working on a Lift project that runs on Google App Engine. After an extended period of development on a local dev server, I uploaded my app and

[Lift] Lift 1.1 M1 question

2009-05-02 Thread TSP
I'm at early stages of a fairly big project at the moment and mainly working in my domain model. Is M1 safe to use, since I doubt we'll get onto serious UI stuff for at least a month and production is likely 2-3 months after that. Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

[Lift] Re: Lift 1.1 M1 question

2009-05-02 Thread Timothy Perrett
Tim, .m1 is indeed stable to use, go right ahead :) Cheers, Timothy On 02/05/2009 16:50, TSP tim.pig...@optrak.co.uk wrote: I'm at early stages of a fairly big project at the moment and mainly working in my domain model. Is M1 safe to use, since I doubt we'll get onto serious UI stuff

[Lift] 1.1-SNAPSHOT API docs

2009-04-28 Thread Andrew Scherpbier
Are the 1.1-SNAPSHOT API docs online somewhere? If not, can I generate them myself using maven2? (As an aside, I'm new to maven... How the !#$#$ do you figure out what commands are available in maven? I'm used to ant -projecthelp to give me a hint as to what is available) --Andrew

[Lift] Re: **IMPORTANT** Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT now compiled against Scala 2.7.4

2009-04-25 Thread sailormoo...@gmail.com
Hi : Can you detail what exactly needs to change ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[Lift] Re: **IMPORTANT** Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT now compiled against Scala 2.7.4

2009-04-25 Thread David Pollak
In your pom.xml, change the Scala Version from 2.7.3 to 2.7.4 On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:26 AM, sailormoo...@gmail.com sailormoo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi : Can you detail what exactly needs to change ? -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala

[Lift] Re: **IMPORTANT** Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT now compiled against Scala 2.7.4

2009-04-25 Thread Timothy Perrett
Sweet! Well done Jorge / David for getting this out so quickly with the announcement of 2.7.4 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Re: **IMPORTANT** Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT now compiled against Scala 2.7.4

2009-04-25 Thread Jorge Ortiz
I had nothing to do with it. David beat me to it. --j On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Sweet! Well done Jorge / David for getting this out so quickly with the announcement of 2.7.4 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

[Lift] Re: **IMPORTANT** Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT now compiled against Scala 2.7.4

2009-04-25 Thread Timothy Perrett
Ah right! I only pointed praise in your direction because I thought you were the appointed scala-trunk tracker! Haha. Either way, well done DPP ­ a splendid effort. Cheers, Tim On 25/04/2009 20:28, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote: I had nothing to do with it. David beat me to it.

[Lift] Re: **IMPORTANT** Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT now compiled against Scala 2.7.4

2009-04-25 Thread David Pollak
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Ah right! I only pointed praise in your direction because I thought you were the appointed scala-trunk tracker! Haha. Either way, well done DPP – a splendid effort. Yeah, changing 2.7.3 to 2.7.4 in 3 or 4 pom

[Lift] Re: The Lift 1.1 list

2009-04-05 Thread Timothy Perrett
Just looking back over the list - where are we too with the current Record implementation? I want to factor out some localization functionality into a ProtoTranslation style system, but for Record rather than mapper; i'm not sure Record is sufficiently mature however? Cheers, Tim

  1   2   >