2009/4/16 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:
Taking the discussion to the main list
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Jonas Bonér jo...@jonasboner.com wrote:
2009/4/16 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jonas Bonér jo...@jonasboner.com
Hi David,
thanks, this is working fine. Problem is resolved.
But dynamic binding is feature of java then why Scala don't support
this.
This is an important feature.
Thanks again
Amit Kumar Verma
On Apr 13, 10:10 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think it's best to use
Hi David,
We are using the lift-scala framework for our development and thinking
about it even more seriously. Can you please give some information on
Roadmap of development of Lift framework. It will be more useful if it
will give a brief description on areas on which framework is working
on.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.comwrote:
hey sean,
i hope you're open to other possibilities than buildr/raven :)
i myself have no real interest in messing with maven after my terrible
experiences from when i was working on java code full time..
i just
Well, maybe the archetype code could be generalized and go into sbt. We can
continue discussing that on the sbt mailing list if you are interested. The
remaining part is just dependency declarations for the hello-lift example.
Thanks,
Mark
On Thursday 16 April 2009, Alexander Kellett
1.1 thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/aca84784b81a6a2c/5539edffc1c874d1?lnk=gstq=1.1#5539edffc1c874d1
On Apr 17, 5:27 am, Amit Kumar Verma cdac.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
We are using the lift-scala framework for our development and thinking
about it
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Just in addition to this - Lift is very community driven, if there is
something you really believe should make it into Lift core then we'll
gladly
listen to people's input and discuss it openly.
That's exactly
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Amit Kumar Verma cdac.a...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi David,
thanks, this is working fine. Problem is resolved.
But dynamic binding is feature of java then why Scala don't support
this.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what dynamic binding is. Scala supports
Are there any debugging tools or techniques for stepping through
snippet code? I would be interested in hearing from anyone on this
subject.
Glenn Silverman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift
I'm currently giving AOP a try
herehttp://github.com/mighdoll/aspecting/tree/master(not in lift).
I was looking for a cleaner way to create objects with
observable properties. I like that an aspect allows for observable objects
that are idiomatic to use and write, and don't require any extra
Lee,
The reason that Lift has the richer MappedField and Field objects in Mapper
and Record is to programmatically add this kind of functionality to fields.
No, it's not PoJos, but it's as syntactically clean and a lot easier to
understand/debug.
Thanks,
David
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM,
Hello Lifters!
BTW apologies in advance if this is an obvious newbie question - I did
a fair bit of searching on the list and saw JavaRebel discussions etc.
I've been taking my first baby steps with Scala/Lift (this Scala/Lift
malarkey is starting to grow on me) so I followed the getting
Switch to the one and only great IDE: Eclipse ;-)But be sure to use the
latest Scala IDE for Eclipse (2.7.4 RC1 or later).
Then you will have lots of fun!
2009/4/17 James Strachan james.strac...@gmail.com
Hello Lifters!
BTW apologies in advance if this is an obvious newbie question - I did
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
I just can't for the life of me figure out why anyone would want to put a
Java/Scala app on GAE.
The answer to this my good fellow, is simple: Marketing.
D'oh! I'm such a dolt... I missed that one.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:57 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I've just committed a version of Lift (including the Lift Example) that
runs on the Google App Engine. You can see the running demo at:
http://liftdemo.appspot.com/
What's missing:
- Mapper and
I'm trying to play around with the StatefulSnippets and can't get it
to hold state. This is what I have for a test:
class Products {
object productVar extends RequestVar(new Product())
def selectedProduct = productVar.is
def search(xhtml: Group): NodeSeq = {
var query = ;
def
I guess it would help to mention that lift:Products.search / is on
index.html and lift:Products.selectedQuery / is on select.html.
On Apr 17, 9:45 pm, bradford fingerm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to play around with the StatefulSnippets and can't get it
to hold state. This is what I have
Welcome,welcome,welcome !
On Apr 18, 1:42 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I am pleased at announce that Atsuhiko Yamanaka has joined the Lift
committers. He did some great Google App Engine work with Lift and has been
making other enhancements to the Lift code
I'm very skeptic and reluctant to GAE right now with all due respect
for Google.I'm used to quite large apps requiring a high degree of
control, DB close to the app and tunings for the app, dedicated HW,
etc. Yeah I know Google promises lots of these things I just can't see
how they can provide
19 matches
Mail list logo
