t; On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:39 PM, joseph hirn wrote:
> > Hello David.
>
> > It's true that if you only have the dependency marked as provided then
> > yes, it won't run. I am not advocating the use of using
> > provided. That is only if you are programming to
Glad I could help.
On Dec 31, 10:12 am, Nathan Parry wrote:
> Thanks, that cleared up the problem. It even pointed out
> LiftRules.unloadHooks which answered my second question.
>
> On Dec 31, 12:33 am, joseph hirn wrote:
>
> > Yes I had an open thread on this issue but i
Heiko,
I just tried runtime scope and I get the same exception when
recompiling a Scala file with jetty still running. Do you experience
the same?
org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Database may be already in use: Locked
by another process. Possible solutions: close all other connection(s);
use the se
framework, it can be and is a
stumbling block to those looking for a quick start into liftweb
hacking.
On Dec 29, 6:00 pm, David Pollak
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM, joseph hirn wrote:
> > Thanks for the response Indrajit. Yes this is the same issue I had
> > opened 2
Yes I had an open thread on this issue but it's not being seen as a
real issue.
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/78454f767280b4b5/d0f462593ae77072?hl=en#d0f462593ae77072
On Dec 30, 7:15 pm, Nathan Parry wrote:
> Searching turned up a few older threads similar to the p
as the
> application you would be expected to provide it as part of the war (and
> therefore not in 'provided' scope).
>
> Cheers, Indrajit
>
> On 28/12/09 1:19 AM, joseph hirn wrote:
>
> > I had started another thread about this being a derby issue but it
Hello Indrajitr,
When using archetype:generate without the command line args, why does
it not build the latest release of the archetype? I saw that 1.1-M8 is
in central but the version it builds uses lift-core 0.8.
I'm not 100% on how it chooses the archetype version from the normal
selection men
I had started another thread about this being a derby issue but it's
more related to the archetype.
Still in the M8 archetype, h2 db is dependency of the project rather
than a dependency of Jetty. It is better to have jetty declare the h2
dep because it keeps the sample app database independent. E
t.github.com/166687
>
> I don't think I've ever seen your solution, which might be a better
> way to handle it.
>
> Tim
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM, joseph hirn wrote:
> > I just started looking into lift today but I ran into an issue where I
> > could
I just started looking into lift today but I ran into an issue where I
could not make hot changes to class files without having to restart
jetty because Derby would complain it was already bound. I was
searching around on here and found this issue:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thre
10 matches
Mail list logo
