Re: Doc: NR: 3.x Clarification for \keepWithTag and fix Typo in example (issue 279140043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2319 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2319: \tag #'D { d4 d d d

Re: Music function for arrow directions in arpeggios

Am 24.02.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Dan Eble: > Is this a case where attaching an arpeggio to a chord with ^ or _ should make > a difference, or do I misunderstand the point of those characters? That was also discussed in the old thread. Not conclusive but with more insights than I have:

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Dan Eble writes: >> On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:14 , David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> I may be nitpicking here, but is there a reason why we should keep the >>> "www." prefix in the printed URL? The actual website has never >>> required it (and it looks a bit more elegant

Re: Music function for arrow directions in arpeggios

On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:22 , Noeck wrote: > > Hi, > >> I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion >> before, but it didn't result in any core changes. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html > >> Dev Team, >> >>

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

> On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:14 , David Kastrup wrote: > >> I may be nitpicking here, but is there a reason why we should keep the >> "www." prefix in the printed URL? The actual website has never >> required it (and it looks a bit more elegant without). > > Sounds reasonable. > >

Re: Music function for arrow directions in arpeggios

Hi, > I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion > before, but it didn't result in any core changes. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html > Dev Team, > > Any reason \arpeggioArrowUp and \arpeggioArrowDown can't be defined this > way

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Valentin Villenave writes: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Noeck wrote: >> What is the tiny symbol in front of the url? A time signature but why? > > Looks like a hack/pun around the © glyph. I like it. (Reminds me of >

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi Joram, > On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Noeck wrote: > > As I wrote in my other mail, I would vote to drop the "music engraving > with" part as it is not language independent and does not provide more > information (you can probably see from the score that it is about

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi David, > On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:12 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > Paul Morris writes: > >>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:11 AM, James wrote: >>> >>> I might tweak the size or change the text slightly but only that. >> >> I like the idea of making

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Noeck wrote: > What is the tiny symbol in front of the url? A time signature but why? Looks like a hack/pun around the © glyph. I like it. (Reminds me of http://artlibre.org/wp-content/copyleft2.jpg) I may be nitpicking here, but is there a

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi, >> 1) It is in *English* ... > > So let's try cutting it down to something language independent and > short. Like > > 턵 www.lilypond.org What is the tiny symbol in front of the url? A time signature but why? >> 2) In general such a phrase looks *unprofessional* to me ... > > Shrug.

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Noeck writes: > Hi Abraham, > > I agree with you. I always change it or remove it for the following reasons: > > 1) It is in *English* and would be the only English part in my otherwise > German score – that looks just unprofessional. That's the most important > part for

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Noeck writes: > Hi > > Am 23.02.2016 um 15:00 schrieb David Kastrup: >> I do agree that it should be unobtrusive, but I >> think that the LilyPond tagline meets that bar. > > As I wrote in my other mail, I would vote to drop the "music engraving > with" part as it is not

Re: Embed LilyPond source files inside generated PDF (issue 225040043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

On 2016/02/23 18:07:39, Valentin Villenave wrote: Access source files only through LilyPond. It would be nice if we could specify an author/description for each source file... but as far as I can see, there are a bunch of "not implemented yet" in Ghostscript:

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno mar 23 feb 2016 alle 17:22, Pierre-Luc Gauthier > ha scritto: >> I am trying to show (or just explain) my LilyPond/Git/LaTeX workflow >> to my >> friends who are fully into music writing; they just don't see it >>

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

On 23.02.2016 13:56, Abraham Lee wrote: In any new score I create, it has become second nature for me to set tagline = ##f because it gets in the way of the finished product. In any new score I create, I first do \include "standard-include.ily" in order to have all default stylesheet, aliases

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

On 23.02.2016 18:42, Noeck wrote: 1) It is in*English* and would be the only English part in my otherwise German score – that looks just unprofessional. That's the most important part for me. Some time ago I made a proposal of having the \language command automatically translate this and

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi Am 23.02.2016 um 15:00 schrieb David Kastrup: > I do agree that it should be unobtrusive, but I > think that the LilyPond tagline meets that bar. As I wrote in my other mail, I would vote to drop the "music engraving with" part as it is not language independent and does not provide more

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi Abraham, I agree with you. I always change it or remove it for the following reasons: 1) It is in *English* and would be the only English part in my otherwise German score – that looks just unprofessional. That's the most important part for me. 2) In general such a phrase looks

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Il giorno mar 23 feb 2016 alle 17:22, Pierre-Luc Gauthier ha scritto: I am trying to show (or just explain) my LilyPond/Git/LaTeX workflow to my friends who are fully into music writing; they just don't see it worth the trouble. But when they see the quality of the

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Paul Morris writes: > Hi all, > >> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:11 AM, James wrote: >> >> I might tweak the size or change the text slightly but only that. > > I like the idea of making the font size smaller, to make it more > subtle. Maybe something in the

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi all, > On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:11 AM, James wrote: > > I might tweak the size or change the text slightly but only that. I like the idea of making the font size smaller, to make it more subtle. Maybe something in the ballpark of \teeny ...compare: \version "2.19.36" \header {

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Pierre-Luc Gauthier [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n187606...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Might I add, > > LilyPond is a rather exotic alternative compared to most other commercial > project. > The project as a whole needs visibility to gain recognition. > Could

Re: Music function for arrow directions in arpeggios

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 23.02.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros: > >> I'm trying to write a function to make easier for me to change arrow >> directions in arpeggios. >> > > I would prefer an event function with a tweak: > >

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Abraham Lee" > > To: "LilyPond Development Team" > > Sent: Tuesday, February 23,

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "Abraham Lee" > To: "LilyPond Development Team" > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:56 PM > Subject: Lose the tagline (permanently) > > >> Dear Dev team, > >

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

- Original Message - From: "Abraham Lee" To: "LilyPond Development Team" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:56 PM Subject: Lose the tagline (permanently) Dear Dev team, [snip] I'd vote to keep it. It's not the only program

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hi Abraham, Am 23.02.2016 um 13:56 schrieb Abraham Lee: > Dear Dev team, > > ... > > I'm not sure what prompted > Han-wen or Jan or whoever to set a default value to it, but I wonder if > it's time for it to go? > > Just some thoughts. I love the quality of LP scores. Removing the default >

Re: Lose the tagline (permanently)

Hello Abraham, On 23/02/16 12:56, Abraham Lee wrote: > Dear Dev team, > > I don't know if this discussion has come up before, but I thought I'd bring > something up that's been on my mind. I'd like to propose that we remove the > tagline variable (or at least its default value). For a while now

Lose the tagline (permanently)

Dear Dev team, I don't know if this discussion has come up before, but I thought I'd bring something up that's been on my mind. I'd like to propose that we remove the tagline variable (or at least its default value). For a while now (and spurred on by some recent comments on other forums), I've