On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:53:58PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Make a ponding of the award, and point to the contest site (if any) for
the details. Like the awarded sum. I'd find it weird to flash numbers
on our main
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
Dusseldorf (west Germany) in second half of
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:57:08AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
i suggest to discuss some communication guidelines, for example don't
say It's settled then until there's more than 1 day of discussion
and not all concerns have been addressed, even if you think that the
decision is obvious.
I
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
May I propose a workaround, just in order to mix business with pleasure:
Why not trying to have one meeting per continent at the same time,
with a daily hour on IRC with everybody?
We tried that almost a year ago:
Spent yesterday wandering around Kloten, the old town part of
Zurich, and looking at stain-glass windows. Spent this morning
walking along Uetliberg, a series of hills right next to the city.
Travel advice: skip the city and culture, just go straight to the
Alps. Ok, maybe Uetliberg isn't high
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:00:39AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Evidence? 'skip' is exactly what it says on the tin.
But we are not talking about \skip (which actually would have the
advantage of _not_ tampering with the current duration in the parser,
and
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:04:50AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote:
Hi all,
Point of information:
On 07/05/12 10:29, Graham Percival wrote:
A number of people think that is the ideal tool for a
non-duration post-event. James and I disagree; we think that a
different tool (such as a new
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:05:45AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
It's important that these things lend credibility to LilyPond.
Yes. Not necessarily time-specific, either. IMO something like
The East Anglican Choir of Upper North-West
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:54:49PM +0100, James wrote:
On 7 May 2012 20:32, Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that this is settled,
Oh that's ok then. I'll get my coat.
Yep.
I don't understand why David's proposition, which is both cheap and neat,
faced such
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
+1
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:15:59AM -0400, John Darrington wrote:
Thank you for your very comprehensive reply, which inspired me to
look at the lilypond website. It is indeed very elaborate and
certainly gives a very professional impression. (There are however
a few terminology issues which I
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:32:08PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
I made a try:
$ git rm
Documentation/it/texidocs/piano-template-with-centered-dynamics.texidoc
error:
'Documentation/it/texidocs/piano-template-with-centered-dynamics.texidoc'
has local modifications
(use --cached to keep
I have a bit more information about the terminology problems.
Although the English website is relatively ok (I remember
specifically thinking about free software vs. open source while
writing it -- but Janek should still fix the little bits I
missed), some translations are wrong.
For example,
On
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 06:19:42PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
What you'll find in the enclosed patch is an attempt to adapt
'make po-replace' in order to have an automatically well-formed .pot
included in 'make dist'.
Please upload patches to rietveld with git-cl, as specified here:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Just two instances in GSoC node that I'm not sure they should be
transformed:
fr (translation)]$ git grep -n 'open source'
web/community.itexi:930:étudiants pour écrire du code au bénéfice de
projets @emph{open
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/5/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
So I guess those shouldn't be changed, and if that's it in the
French translation then I guess you're fine.
We have in English
http://lilypond.org/freedom.html
“Gift
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:17:05PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I've no objection to the docs being changed to use an empty chord
but its semantics will need to be introduced somewhere. The best place
is probably the LM, in 2.2.4 Combining notes into chords.
I'm still not happy with an
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il 25/04/2012 12:04, Graham Percival ha scritto:
[..]
I'm trying to learn Python and I'd like to contribute to some frog
tasks requiring python (I've starred some frog issues in the tracker).
Probably this is too much
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:57:07AM +0700, Michael Pozhidaev wrote:
After the last announce I have tried the linux x86_64 binary package of
lilypond-2.15.38 to see what is going to be in 2.16. It works but I met
some regressions in midi output comparing with 2.14.2 currently I am
working with.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:05PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 4 mai 2012, at 14:29, Francisco Vila wrote:
734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work.
278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work.
Are those changes too invasive?
Yes.
I don't think it's a good idea to
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.38/Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml
rm -rf /tmp/tmpuq4W6b
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test-lily/dist-check.py, line 137, in module
main ()
File test-lily/dist-check.py, line 132, in main
check_files (tarball, repo)
File
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:42:16AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
OK, Phil, I'll take over as Bug Meister.
Is [1] still an accurate summary of the responsibilities?
Yes, but one possibly-unwritten job for the bug squad is to check
the regtest comparison whenever there's a release. That is
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:26:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Turns out I don't seem to have push privileges:
What's your github username?
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:25:56PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
What's your github username?
I don't think I have an account at github.
You may wish to consider making one, given how many lilypond
sub-projects are there:
https://github.com
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:12:37PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Well, I can always submit patches. I don't really fancy registering
with services that claim that they can change terms of use without
announcement, with any subsequent use signifying consent to the changed
terms.
oh, I wouldn't
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:14:23AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Then we'll have hard numbers on which developers are abusing the
process. I mean, sure, we all know whose patches tend to be great
and whose patches tend to be problematic
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply
to other software
Given how things are going, it's past time that we have somebody
else that can make releases. Who's interested in learning?
Requirements:
- powerful computer
- can already compile GUB from scratch
- is well known to lilypond developers (say, at least 1 year of
lilypond development)
- familiar
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
answer about this specific case? I guess the general consensus is
go ahead and we'll figure it out
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
In fact, if you have to
do half a dozen of iterations before getting things actually right on
the somewhat more than superficial level provided by our tests, you'll
have gained lots of good Karma on the road.
I was thinking that
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply
to other software competitions in the future.
*sigh*
I'll rehash an old email.
I know that some of us would like to get paid for lilypond work.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:28:54AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
There is no reason whatsoever that this should only be done by a single
person.
Totally!
I would expect that _every_ person contributing more than two
patches per month should be able, after uploading a patch, to be running
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:19:55AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
hashtag and/or @lilypond twitter account in an iframe instead? If we
use actual twitter, we would get some publicity on twitter.com too.
It's certainly possible,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:18:23AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
I mean: I thought it was Jan.
yeah, it's Jan.
- Graham
\
\href=\http://www.ensemble101.fr\;here/a to learn more!
-
The Birmingham Amateur Theatre is presenting Penzance Pirates,
starring our documentation editor Trevor Daniels as the talking lion![1]
-
Project manager Graham Percival has successfully defended his PhD
thesis. Only two days
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:05:53AM +0100, James wrote:
Hello,
On 26 April 2012 07:55, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I have a meeting in mid-May w/ the University of Paris VIII. They're
donating a computer to LilyPond and I'll set patchy up on it.
While you can set
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:07:32AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
I am afraid that you overestimate what I have been doing. I've been
running test-patches and looking at pretty pictures.
You've done more than that; you occasionally say this looks like
a silly design or why not do XYZ instead.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:33:03PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Well then, let's have some important project news posted. I'll write a
note about GSoC,
yes.
and i think we can make an announcement when MikeJoe
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:14:24PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 4/24/12 2:31 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I see two possibilities:
- change it to projects or something like that. I think it would be
useful to have such a list
No. Such projects lists are a pain to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:28:21PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
2012/4/24 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
2) ask the LSR author to add the possibility to insert translated
titles and descriptions (the website itself could benefit from this,
since it may enable language negotiation
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 25 avr. 2012, at 11:53, Graham Percival wrote:
If you really really want to have fluff pieces on the main
lilypond website, I could imagine us using the top right-hand
corner (Mike's wasted space) for twitter-like
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
As I understand, fixxcc.py will correct that automatically, so I don't
have to bother about that? Nevertheless I'll remember that for my
future patches.
fixcc.py can correct those, but this adds noise to the git
commit
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:06:00PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I agree. Given your limited computing power, you are the very
last person who should be running Patchy.
It is not just my computing resources that make me unsuitable.
I
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:14:33PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
I know that this is not a very positive message, but I am trying
to save you yet more anguish. Â The lilypond project currently does
not even function smoothly between senior developers with more
than 100
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:52:55AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
3) Graham is wrong when he says writing snippets is not a good
introduction to lilypond. I started by doing a fair few that
documented undocumented features shown in the regtests.
Sorry, I came on too strong there. I didn't mean to
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:17:06AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
It is close to two months that I have been the only person running
test-patches, even though several volunteers claimed they would do so.
It has been the main reason I shelled out €20 for a
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:40:30PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
It's great to have you working on GSoC for LilyPond! Good job
with your perseverance in getting your project accepted!
This, especially. It's great to see that sometimes lots of effort
is rewarded!
Congratulations, Janek!
-
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:04:57AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il 21/04/2012 13:09, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Because snippets come from LSR, and that needs a texidoc to
display some text for the snippet.
So it seems that there are only two possible solutions (I'm just
daydreaming):
1
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:33:49AM +0100, James wrote:
Err.. not sure what you mean by that technically but it's complicated
enough with snippets as it is, to follow the translation method adds
even more complexity (if the CG is anything to go by).
+1
We want to encourage contributors not
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:27:20AM -0700, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Trying to anticipate future problems, I recalled guile
indentation:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4896043/
I would be happy to tackle
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 19/04/2012 21:30, Graham Percival disait :
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, other than
translators, who may merge with that if they want to and don't
break anything.
The question of whether
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
It reflects the news entries in the repository. When a new LilyPond
Report appears, it _is_ announced there.
Yes, it is. However, in the last 20 months only
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:54:45AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
On 12-04-20 12:36 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
can you please tell me if it's normal that my patch has been ignored?
It's a very trivial patch, maybe I didn't follow the right procedure?
Hi Federico,
Please follow this procedure in
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:14:24AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
To amplify my reply to Federico: if developers create similar
tracker items and attach a trivial patch without creating a Rietveld
issue, it would be very helpful if they would update the tracker
item as patch-new or perhaps even
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
mts...@gmail.com writes:
We have a sweet plug in the project video for GNU LilyPond and I was
wondering if I could strike up a partnership with LilyPond to put a link
to the project on the LilyPond front page for the duration
We have a new release candidate, slower development, highlights on
development problems, and a vacation.
RELEASE CANDIDATE
As always, this means:
- activity on master goes on as normal.
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, other than
translators, who may merge with that if they
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:52:55PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
SLOWER DEVELOPMENT
Development has slowed to a trickle. I'm not certain if this is
I am partly responsible.
A power-law function for development work is certainly predicted
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:01:15PM +0100, James wrote:
I kept a few mails that David sent a few months back and he suggested
git fetch --depth=100
David was wrong. [correction: or rather, David was answering the
question you asked, not the question you should have been asking]
In that
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:49:11PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
The final suggestion depends on suggestions from all of you. If you
find a better idea for (UP_and_DOWN(d)), I'll do so. If you find
easier: for_UP_and_DOWN, it could be this.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:16:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Actually, with option -std=c++0x GCC would accept
for (Direction d : { UP, DOWN })
{
...
}
and that would be readable enough without having to revert to macros.
I like that solution, but I'm iffy about relying on compiler
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:37:14PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I like that solution, but I'm iffy about relying on compiler
support for elements of languages that are less than 10 years old.
I was not suggesting we use it. I just pointed
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:18:41PM +0100, James wrote:
james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ ./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py, line 56, in module
TAGS = os.listdir (in_dir)
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: ''
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:10:50PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
I've uploaded my patch without for_UP_and_DOWN, but now it's time to talk
about this #define. I'd like to make a second patch that will introduce
that, but there was no consensus.
ok, great!
If you don't know, what I am
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
On 14 April 2012 16:25, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:
oops, that should be we propose that we use these direction
loops
for (UP_and_DOWN(d
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
{ ... }
for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
{ ... }
Not yet. I just wanted to clarify what you were talking about,
since most people don't have
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:04:57AM -0500, David Nalesnik wrote:
The big issue for me, however, is that I
don't know if it's wise to install lilydev on my current computer. It's
been multiply (and for me, unfathomably) partitioned and I don't want to
add to the mess since I use the computer so
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:50:16PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
My comment relates to the need to git add as a separate step.
You _only_ need to use git add if you made your changes _manually_ in
the work directory instead of going through git.
I had to read David's email a few times, and
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 12:36:05PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
OK. I'm in the final throes of updating the LSR and have found 2
issues exemplified by a single file. In snippets/new we used to
have a file called screech-boink.ly, with a doctitle of Screech and
Boink and an LSR tag of headwords.
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
It'll be a ginormous patch - I can't imagine anyone reviewing it.
My suggestion is that I push it directly to staging, given the
number of times I'll have tested it?
I don't mind. I mean, I _will_ be looking at the patch, but I
have
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 06:26:30PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
OK. I know why the patch is broken - it doesn't contain the new
snippets (like screech-and-boink.ly). This appears to have been a
mistake when I was creating the huge patch - I had six patches to
apply to get the new one, and I
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:06:50PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I did it as a single patch because it really makes sense like that.
There's a lot of changes going on here. 63 deletions from new.
Deleting files from new has nothing to do with a full LSR import.
That is a separate change.
If I
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:56:15AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible, similar to automake, that the name of the
currently processed file gets written to stdout, and that this
behaviour is the default? In case the names are meaningless, a simple
No, because what's taking
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:04:39PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can
build it, Graham, if you're over hours.
It's already building. I've been trying to build it for the past
few days, but I can only do it after booting
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
When a countdown completes, I mark the tracker item patch-push and
Google dutifully sends the resulting email to lilypond-auto, where
it formerly went to -devel.
It formely went to bug-lilypond.
I wonder if the owners are
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:33:27AM +0100, James wrote:
If I notice one - Mike S for instance - not picking on him especially
but in the olden days when he was 'quick-patch-McMike', and when I was
checking patches manually, I'd fix the tracker myself as I could see
who was the Rietveld owner.
Sorry to butt in, but I want to confirm stuff.
1) is LSR running 2.14.2 right now?
2) how many files were uncompilable? I am aware of one file,
which I believe we deleted. Were there any other problematic
files?
3) can we do a mundane LSR import? i.e. don't touch anything in
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:29:40PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
No - that'll only tell me I've not done anything really stupid with
makelsr. I ran it without naming a tarball, so it just updates the
snippets with (I believe) anything in snippets/new.
That is correct. It also updates any
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:37:53PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Background: it seems to me the safest way to be sure that all the
updates I'm going to do to the snippets don't kill the documentation
build is to test it on a clean build (which my patchy user pretty
much is). I believe the easiest
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:53:23PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Don't worry about doing extra checks with patchy. If it passes a
doc build from scratch on your computer, then it's highly unlikely
to cause a problem at the patchy stage.
I have had a problem with this in the past, which is why I
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 06:48:00PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 04/04/2012 13:06, Janek Warchoł disait :
How did you like the colorful Credo example posted in the LilyPond
Report #25
(http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-25lang=en#the_game_of_the_month)?
Just a remark:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 05:49:24PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Peter Chubb l...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote:
One issue is that the `How to participate' webpage at
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/ doesn't point people at
Rietveld -- it just tells them
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:53:33PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
But there is a very basic problem:
If I test compiling the whole LSR and all is fine but compiling a
single file from LSR failes, means I can't trust my testing-results.
How can I continue the work? Having no chance to notice
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:06:37AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Contemporary vibrato is a total hack (it was one of the 1st things I wrote
in LilyPond). It's a miracle that it ever compiled in the first place. I
have a 2.15-friendly version I've been using lying around somewhere that is
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 06:12:27AM +, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/04/01 05:00:25, Graham Percival wrote:
it would be much nicer if there was a macro for this.
It is better to define macros for just the part inside the for(...) .
Then we can write, and auto-indenters can indent
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
Thanku you, Janek and James.
Don't add replies to the top an email.
Wouldn't it be nicer for git cl to ask for an issue number in case it
is unknown?
It does. I suggest you update your git-cl to get this addition
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:00:44AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
Wouldn't it be nicer for git cl to ask for an issue number in case
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:09:59AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Cc: k-ohara5...@oco.net; re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com;
julien.ri...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
It looked fine on Rietveld when I looked, and I couldn't find the
exceptions bit in the CG, so it's pushed to staging as is.
Oops, we were smarter than I thought -- the exceptions are built
into git-cl precisely to avoid problems of
Sure, go ahead and push.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:57:37AM +0100, James wrote:
I've updated LilyDev and been working with it this week testing the
basics - it makes the code and the doc. I've given Mike a copy of the
iso (as he was the only one I knew who used LilyDev in anger)
actually, all official lilypond
A gentle reminder that the new git-cl automatically adds a base
url for lilypond, so you can then find all lilypond items:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:31:11PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'm subscribed to -auto as a mailing list, but for stuff like this,
it fits my workflow better as a newsgroup. Bugs and devel are also
newsgroups on the gmane server, but I can't find auto. Should it be
there?
I have no objection;
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:02:50AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna vi...@dsi.unimi.it:
_All_ Unknown files are from `Documentation/snippets/new' as
requested by the Contributors Guide.
see:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:03:40AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am 30. März 2012 01:51 schrieb Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:02:50AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna vi...@dsi.unimi.it:
_All_ Unknown files
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
I locally reverted your revert and could make, make test and make
doc from scratch in the src dir after the fixes that I committed
today. Unless there is any objections I will push the revert of the
revert to staging.
Please wait a
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:34:37PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
Let's see if current master can be built ok, and fix the dist
failures. *Then* we can add back the lilypond-book thing.
oh wait, I just checked git and now see that you have a fix for
dist, and have a solution for this as well
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:29:46PM +, markpole...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want to be presumptuous here, but is there any
chance I can be credited for the original idea? Or is
that not typically done in the snippets directory?
We don't do this -- at least, we certainly don't have
ge.ja.html
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.35/Documentation/misc/browser-language.nl.html
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.35/input/regression/lilypond-book/include/example.ly
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.35/input/regression/lilypond-book/include/myvar.ily
rm
We have a new mailing list for automatic messages. All updates to
google code issues are now sent there instead of bug-lilypond.
The reply-to headers for -auto are set to -devel.
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-auto
Note that you can get direct emails for issues by starring the
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 07:44:45AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
We need a *secretary*. We need a *paper pusher*. We need a
trained monkey. I could even teach a first-year university
student how to be a perfect Frog meister, and having
501 - 600 of 5586 matches
Mail list logo
