Re: Updates to fret-diagrams

2009-01-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 03 January 2009 02:30:36 pm Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Thanks for the review, Joe. On 1/2/09 4:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com joenee...@gmail.com wrote: Reviewers: Carl.D.Sorensen, http://codereview.appspot.com/11857/diff/1/2 File input/regression/fret-diagrams.ly (right):

Doc patch for relative includes.

2008-12-31 Thread Joe Neeman
Here is a patch to the documentation regarding bug 391 (relative \include paths). Could a doc writer please take a quick look? Joe From 85333ead871d09ad4a40f8096b6c71a2086ceb76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 09:09:46 +1100 Subject: [PATCH

Weird doc output with @rlearning.

2008-12-31 Thread Joe Neeman
Have a look at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Including-LilyPond- files#Including-LilyPond-files Towards the bottom of the page, we have the sentences (The location of this directory is installation-dependent - see of information Other sources of information). and

Re: Page turn breaking blank pages

2008-12-14 Thread Joe Neeman
Hi Nicolas, For reducing blank pages, the short answer is that you should try increasing blank-page-force (or blank-last-page-force or blank-after-score-page-force). Perhaps it's better to name these xxx-penalty so their purpose is more clear. Some more detailed responses follow... On Sun,

Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug #218 (center staccato over stem instead of notehead)

2008-11-29 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 01:29 +0100, Maximilian Albert wrote: Hi, attached is a patch for bug #218 (see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=218). It simply tests whether the directions of stem and articulation coincide, and if so it shifts the latter sideways. Please note that

Re: * Fix DynamicTextSpanner left alignment.

2008-11-29 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 15:25 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/7763 Hey, what happened to my comment? Anyway, it was related to the fact that the engraver is not the best place for layout logic (for example, what if 'bound-details is a callback? Then the engraver might

make check fails

2008-11-14 Thread Joe Neeman
With this morning's git, I get a musicxml2ly error when running make check: /usr/bin/python ../../../scripts/musicxml2ly.py -o out-test/00a-Basics-Pitches.ly 00a-Basics-Pitches.xml Reading MusicXML from 00a-Basics-Pitches.xml ... Converting to LilyPond expressions... Traceback (most recent call

Re: [PATCHES] Re: Remarks about the building process

2008-11-08 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 16:59 -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: 2008/11/5 John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]: See also the other attached patch. +#define EPSNULL 1e-12 static void print_buildings (listBuilding const b) @@ -215,6 +216,9 @@ Skyline::internal_merge_skyline (listBuilding

Re: Trouble getting my page layout just right

2008-11-03 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 21:53 +1100, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: In short, I'm stumped! Any ideas? So I had a look at the file you sent off-list and it turns out that the unevenness is being caused by poor extent-estimates. A workaround is to set VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent to #'(-4 . 4).

Re: KeyboardStaff?

2008-10-08 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 00:21 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: Hey everyone, I agree with Valentin. I think it makes sense to just get rid of PianoStaff. Semantically, it's redundant; and removing an entire context would simplify the learning process for newbies, among other things. Is keeping

Re: a couple of bugs with lyrics

2008-09-11 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 22:26 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Perhaps we could add a default for minimum-X-extent in define-grobs.scm. [...] Sounds like a good idea. Joe seems to be on vacation, though... I just moved to a different continent to start a Ph.D, so I've been a bit preoccupied.

Re: Code review tool?

2008-09-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:42 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Hi guys, What do you think of using codereview.appspot for code reviews? Looks good. It would be nice if it didn't default to git-svn head, though. Actually, I see that they have some TODOs in their source regarding this... Joe

Re: [PATCH] Fix dimensions for several output variables

2008-09-06 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 20:19 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: Hello, Attached is a patch to fix the interpretation of dimensions for a few output variables. Currently, no matter the unit specified, the dimensions for the variables listed in the patch are converted to millimeters, but are

Re: [PATCH] Add property harmonicDots to allow dots to be visible on harmonics

2008-08-27 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 23:39 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: Hello, Attached is a patch to give the option of showing dots on harmonics by setting harmonicDots = ##t OK to apply? Looks good to me. Joe ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: [PATCH] Fix #666 - Setting 'avoid-slur to 'around always places grob outside slur

2008-08-27 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 00:11 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: Hello, Here's a patch which makes 'around work properly for slur avoidance, i.e., the script is only moved when there's a collision. LGTM ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Sad news

2008-08-24 Thread Joe Neeman
This morning, I was contacted by a friend of Rune Zedeler, who informed me that Rune took his own life on the 2nd of July. Rune had been a member of the LilyPond community for many years, both as a programmer and as an active participant on the mailing lists. He will be very much missed.

Re: [PATCH] Flexible accidentals code from /dev/rune

2008-08-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:57 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No thanks, I just pushed the second patch and I've done a much smaller and cleaner version of the first one. This works great! (there was just a glitch

Re: [PATCH] Flexible accidentals code from /dev/rune

2008-08-20 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 22:02 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2008/8/19 Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No thanks, I just pushed the second patch and I've done a much smaller and cleaner version of the first one. This works great! (there was just a glitch in a doc string, which I have

Re: [PATCH] Flexible accidentals code from /dev/rune

2008-08-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 13:09 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I'll try to have another look at it, but from what I recall, there were serious issues with the code (it still has a bunch of FIXME and commented out parts). If you want to have this patch in, you need to rework it so a. you

Re: [PATCH] Flexible accidentals code from /dev/rune

2008-08-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 20:41 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2008/8/19 Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've been having a look at dev/rune over the last week or so and I'm pretty sure I can get a minimal version with the new accidental functionality prepared in the next day or two (minus

Re: spacing problem

2008-08-18 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 20:01 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: They can usually do that if you can limit the range to a single release. I've done bisecting. This is the problematic commit: commit 2b8a93c3007d1789ac67c86b0ed63fbae003fc6e Author: Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon

Re: spacing problem

2008-08-16 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They can usually do that if you can limit the range to a single release. I've done bisecting. This is the problematic commit: commit 2b8a93c3007d1789ac67c86b0ed63fbae003fc6e Author: Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Need help merging dev/rune into master

2008-08-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 13:11 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, my mail bounced from Rune's address. Does anyone know how to contact him? [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the one which is publically available. That seems

Re: Need help merging dev/rune into master

2008-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 08:45 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: Greetings, Rune has just told me he's too busy to work on Lily right now, but I really really need the accidentals code he's put on his branch. The point is, I have to print the score and go to the opera house tomorrow, so this is

Re: GDP -- Revised second draft of Fretted strings

2008-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 17:49 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Dear Lilypond Users and Developers, We're pleased to announce a revised second draft of NR 2.4 Fretted strings. This draft includes the new predefined-fretboards functionality that enables transposable guitar fret diagrams.

Re: Need help merging dev/rune into master

2008-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 14:15 +1000, Joe Neeman wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 08:45 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: Greetings, Rune has just told me he's too busy to work on Lily right now, but I really really need the accidentals code he's put on his branch. The point is, I have

Re: Hello and question about the list

2008-07-16 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 14:40 -0500, Eric Knapp wrote: I guess that posts like this are not welcome on the devel list. Please accept my apologies for polluting and I will post questions on the user list instead. user is probably the correct list, as long as you are only adding scheme code that

Re: proposed enhancement to vertical stretching logic

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've now re-implemented the stretch method with parameters that should exactly reproduce the current stretching (i.e. equal amounts of space are inserted), but now

Re: GDP question about piano templates dynamics

2008-06-30 Thread Joe Neeman
On 6/29/08, Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, at least that explains what the New_fingering_engraver is! As long as the engraver is under construction, is it easy to make the skyline 'disappear' between dynamic marks so that it behaves more like the figured bass engraver (see

Re: proposed enhancement to vertical stretching logic

2008-06-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Reinhold started a recent thread on -user about some problems with the current vertical spacing behaviour, particularly when stretching large systems to fill a page:

Re: RFC: book parts

2008-06-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Nicolas Sceaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When typesetting a book with many scores and with possibly some text sections, page breaking may become an inextricable issue: 1) the default, optimal, page breaker, which gives the best result wrt line and page

Re: Arg still having problems with the gub build

2008-06-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 20:11 +, Mark Hanlon wrote: Hello everyone, I'm still having problems with doing the gub lilypond build. I decided to start from scratch, delete everything, and start again. I'm now getting even less far than before :) Awesome, I'm a great developer! I run

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

2008-06-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 00:07 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What if you change __x86__ to __i386__? (Sorry to turn you into a guinea pig, but I don't have an array of different x86 configurations at my disposal). Great

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

2008-05-31 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:20 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:02 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Could someone put this into a init_fpu() function with appropriate #ifdefs, and call that from main

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:02 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Could someone put this into a init_fpu() function with appropriate #ifdefs, and call that from main() ? Done. Thanks! 2008/5/28 John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2008/05/26, I wrote: #include fpu_control.h and adding

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

2008-05-25 Thread Joe Neeman
2008/5/19 John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I just installed Fedora 9 on my x86 (32 bits) laptop, which comes with gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8). I can compile LilyPond binary succesfully, but running it on any input file makes it hang on an infinite loop, most often after

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

2008-05-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:41 +0200, John Mandereau wrote: On 2008/05/23, Joe Neeman wrote: Does re-building without optimisations help? Yes, it does! Building with GCC 4.3.0 and without -O2 flag makes LilyPond produce the same output [*] as with GCC 4.1.2 with optimisations, but it is also

Re: (patch proposition) note-by-number augmentation dot position

2008-05-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Risto Vääräniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Joe, 2008/5/17 Joe Neeman : Sorry for the long delay. I certainly agree that the new behaviour looks better. I'm a bit concerned, though, that you only use special cases for 8th and 16th notes. Why

Re: [PATCH] Re: Vertical position of cue instrument names

2008-05-17 Thread Joe Neeman
2008/5/5 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Sonntag, 4. Mai 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels: Hi Reinhold These fix most of the problems: \override InstrumentSwitch #'outside-staff-priority = 100 \override InstrumentSwitch #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT but not the baseline

Re: AccidentalSuggestion problem

2008-05-17 Thread Joe Neeman
2008/5/9 Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/5/8 Risto Vääräniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I played around a bit with your example and found out that LP behaves very inconsistently. If I just comment out the \break (and move fis g to the next line) I get different results than when I just

Re: [PATCH] Scheme function ly:string-duration

2008-05-17 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 13:31 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: Thanks for your comments, Joe. I'm struggling a bit with sscanf () though. I tried your suggestion of if (sscanf (s.c_str (), %d) != s.size ()) ... but it fails with a segfault; when compiling, I get two warnings: that there's not

Re: [PATCH] Scheme function ly:string-duration

2008-05-16 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, In the thread about creating custom metronome markups (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-04/msg00629.html) and the subsequent discussion at The LilyPond Report, Valentin expressed the wish for a

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 463 - followVoice/setStaffSwitch weirdness

2008-05-16 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Attached is a patch which fixes issue 463, together with a regression test. Thanks. I'll commit it once savannah starts recognising my new ssh key... ___ lilypond-devel

Re: (patch proposition) note-by-number augmentation dot position

2008-05-16 Thread Joe Neeman
2008/5/2 Risto Vääräniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/4/25 Risto Vääräniemi : In current LP version the \note and \note-by-number put augmentation dots very close to the flags. Sometimes they even collide. On the other hand if the stem length is increased the dots are not moved any

Re: lybook-db and make xxx-clean

2008-04-27 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM, John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:12:26 +1000 Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Incomplete test-clean and web-clean

Re: lybook-db and make xxx-clean

2008-04-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe Neeman wrote: It seems that some changes in the way lilypond-books output is stored have broken certain build rules, particularly ones that clean stuff. For example, $ make check $ make test-clean $ time

lybook-db and make xxx-clean

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Neeman
It seems that some changes in the way lilypond-books output is stored have broken certain build rules, particularly ones that clean stuff. For example, $ make check $ make test-clean $ time make check real0m31.410s user0m25.598s sys0m4.084s $ make test-clean rm -fr out/lybook-db $

Re: Table of contents broken?

2007-12-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:23:00 Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Le 9 déc. 07 à 12:13, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit : Le 9 déc. 07 à 11:58, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit : Le 8 déc. 07 à 23:41, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit : I'm trying to use \table-of-contents in a large mass (a full score with 17

Re: voltaOnThisStaff not working as expected

2007-11-30 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 03:27:37 Mats Bengtsson wrote: It seems that this property has been removed in the implementation and that the Volta_engraver by default has been moved to the Score context (I seem to recall that I proposed a similar solution many years ago). So, to get volta brackets on the

a locale-independent search/replace?

2007-11-24 Thread Joe Neeman
Does anyone know how to write a simple search and replace for a UTF-8 string that works regardless of the current locale? In order to fix bug 499, I tried to write a simple function that replaces all whitespace by spaces. My first attempt was pretty stupid -- I forgot that the string was in

Re: make web fails [was: Re: quick addition before 2.11.35]

2007-11-17 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:28:09 John Mandereau wrote: Le vendredi 16 novembre 2007 à 13:53 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit : Well, how did it fail? What was the log message? Ah, I got this failure with page-turn-page-breaking-badturns.ly regtest again. When I try to view EPS output with

git master no longer builds

2007-11-05 Thread Joe Neeman
There seems to be a documentation problem in git master; typing make (even on a cleanly checked out copy) gives me many repetitions of the following: LANG= makeinfo --enable-encoding -I ./out --output=./out/lilypond.info out/lilypond.nexi out/lilypond.nexi:11: warning: unrecognized encoding

Re: lilypond consistent crash

2007-09-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:11:27 Trevor Bača wrote: On 9/23/07, Adam James Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I'm pretty frustrrated at the moment - wondering if anyone has exeperienced a similar problem. I unfortunately don't have a small snippet to describe the problem, because

Re: Syntax highlighting in LilyPad?

2007-09-20 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:54:25 Valentin Villenave wrote: Hello, Sometimes (frequently enough, as I'm kind of an efficient LilyPond preacher), one of my pupils brings me his laptop and proudly tells me look Valentin, I've installed LilyPond; now please show me how to use it! (yeah, I told

Re: bug with barlines?

2007-09-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 07:58, Graham Percival wrote: I believe this is http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=377 You could help Joe by creating a minimal example. Don't bother -- I have a fix in my working copy. Joe ___

Re: bug with barlines?

2007-09-03 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 04:04, Till Rettig wrote: Hi, I won't get mensurstriche-barlines anymore with the last few 2.11.x versions. It used to be, with the command \override BarLine #'transparent = ##t in the score context, that only the barlines on staves would be made transparent, not

Re: compiling

2007-09-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sunday 02 September 2007 13:29, you wrote: Is there a particular reason that you are trying to compile? Compiling lilypond is fairly involved and we try to discourage it. There are binary packages on the lilypond website that should work on Feisty. Can you please explain to me what is

Re: compiling

2007-09-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 03:08, c.m.bryan wrote: Update: make check ends with the following: Processing... Running lilypond.../home/chris/Desktop/lilypond-2.11.30/out/bin/lilypond: Symbol `scm_i_freelist' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking GNU LilyPond 2.11.30

Re: collision barline with accidental

2007-08-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 15:30, Werner LEMBERG wrote: [git 2007-08-19 13d78fe] While Joe's latest changes to the horizontal spacing are giving good results, here's a special case where it fails. Thanks, the spacing part of this issue is fixed. Thanks too! Shall I file a bug

Re: collision barline with accidental

2007-08-20 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 20 August 2007 15:29, Werner LEMBERG wrote: [git 2007-08-19 13d78fe] While Joe's latest changes to the horizontal spacing are giving good results, here's a special case where it fails. Thanks, the spacing part of this issue is fixed. ___

Re: serious spacing problems with triplets

2007-07-28 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 28 July 2007 17:41, Werner LEMBERG wrote: [lilypond git from today] While many on this list praise the new spacing stuff, I'm currently experiencing severe problems with it. The example below shows that accidentals collide with stems. This must NEVER EVER happen! Thanks, this

Re: dumb stacking page breaker

2007-07-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 16 July 2007 05:49, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sunday 15 July 2007 08:37, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Should Page_breaking::pack_systems_on_least_pages also compute the Page_spacing_result force_, demerits_, etc, slots, even though they are not used

Re: dumb stacking page breaker

2007-07-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sunday 15 July 2007 08:37, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] To fit with this, I'd suggest that you move Stacking_page_breaking::compute_page_breaks to something like Page_breaking::pack_systems_on_least_pages and change its interface to match the other

Re: vertical spacing problem when space is 0

2007-07-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thursday 12 July 2007 00:12, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Hi, A regression was introduced a few days ago regarding the spacing of lines when next-space is set to 0 (this used to be fixed). On ragged-bottom pages, the spacing is fine in spite of the programming errors (insane blocking force), but

Re: dot changes break Gregorian notation

2007-07-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Joe, your latest changes break the \augmentum stuff in Gregorian notation. Thanks, this is fixed. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: dot changes break Gregorian notation

2007-07-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thursday 12 July 2007 07:02, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Another regression, BTW, is that now hyphens *always* appear between lyrics syllables, at least in Gregorian notation. Before your changes, hyphens by default have been suppressed in case text syllables can be placed near to each other.

Re: todays git: staffs printing on top of each other

2007-07-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 22:45, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Hi, I updated to todays git because of the fix for issue 375. But a new bug is present which causes staffs to print on top of each other when there is more than 1 page and there are slurs in the lowest staff that are broken to the next

Re: dumb stacking page breaker

2007-07-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thursday 12 July 2007 07:07, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Joe, Here is a patch where a stacking-page-breaking function is implemented. May you review it, and tell me if there is something wrong or some bad coding, before I go on with documentation and regression tests? The first tests I have

Re: dot changes break Gregorian notation

2007-07-11 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Joe, your latest changes break the \augmentum stuff in Gregorian notation. (Do a search for `augmentum' and compare the example on the web page created from the current git with the one in

Re: dumb stacking page breaker

2007-07-10 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 00:09, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: I'd like to write something like that using the new infrastructure. 1) compute the line breaks in the most straightforward way, that is without considering page breaks or the number of systems per page. Just lines as regular as

Re: bug report

2007-06-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 16 June 2007 08:51, Masahiro NIitsuma wrote: Hi I find a bug. When I use deutsch.ly, bes can't be compiled. This is not a bug. When you use deutsch.ly, there is no 'bes'. The note a whole step below C is called 'b'. ___

Re: [patch] breakable markups

2007-06-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sunday 03 June 2007 23:01, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Nicolas Sceaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, While thinking about an automatic way to build tables of contents (with a few \header variables, a \table-of-contents command, et voilà), I realized that an other problem needs to be solved

Re: uninitialized memory

2007-05-20 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 21 May 2007 05:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Hi Joe, in Page_breaking::system_count_bounds (vectorBreak_position const chunks, bool min) a vector is resized and then indexed. Can you document why this will never result in unitialized memory being

Re: uncompress_solution() fix

2007-05-20 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 21 May 2007 08:26, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Hi Joe, can you review my commit ** commit e0bffa5a02d173f02a2f259eb2916d06c777d5f8 Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun May 20 19:24:09 2007 -0300 Fix disappearing last page problem. - Add

Re: [patch] top level page breaking directives

2007-05-08 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 07 May 2007 18:54, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: A new patch: - \pageBreak, \noPageBreak, etc, can be used at top-level or inside a score, as Mats suggested; - the issue regarding the (sometimes) ineffectiveness of \pageBreak at toplevel is fixed by specifying a

Re: [patch] top level page breaking directives

2007-05-05 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sunday 06 May 2007 03:10, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Han-Wen, Joe, Here is a patch which implements top-level page breaking directives, for instance: Great! I think this has been a needed feature for some time. I just have one comment with the implementation, though. +void

Re: input/tolsr/

2007-05-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Friday 04 May 2007 14:30, Graham Percival wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: My gripe with it is that we're using the repository as a form of communication. I think you will get more useful input if you use email discussions for communication. If you position tolsr as dumping ground, that

Re: break-align-symbol vs. break-align-symbols

2007-05-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 18:51, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Joe, has break-align-symbol been completely removed in favour of break-align-symbols? No. The grobs to which you can align (eg. Clef, BarLine) have the break-align-symbol property and the objects that are aligned (eg. BarNumber) have the

Re: centered dynamic in PianoStaff

2007-04-22 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 23 April 2007 05:20, Till Rettig wrote: Have still a problem with those stems connecting from one system of piano staff to the other. The systems get somehow unaturally spread, and I suppose this tweak causing this. Then the stems (which are just manually set to a specific length to

Re: centered dynamic in PianoStaff

2007-04-20 Thread Joe Neeman
On Friday 20 April 2007 17:44, Werner LEMBERG wrote: The template for centered dynamics in a PianoStaff fails miserably in the current git. I can't find an obvious mistake in the template itself, so it seems to be a problem with the vertical layout engine... What do you mean by fails

Re: centered dynamic in PianoStaff

2007-04-20 Thread Joe Neeman
line so that it is set to ##f (this might be a good idea by default). Till Joe Neeman wrote: On Friday 20 April 2007 17:44, Werner LEMBERG wrote: The template for centered dynamics in a PianoStaff fails miserably in the current git. I can't find an obvious mistake in the template itself

Re: TeX-related things are very slow when I have lots of files

2007-04-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 14 April 2007 14:29, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Now lets create some files: $ make -C Documentation/user web # Ctrl-C after a minute or so $ time mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mode_setup; end. real0m32.998s user0m28.638s sys 0m4.336s Try this for both

Re: TeX-related things are very slow when I have lots of files

2007-04-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 14 April 2007 18:01, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Try this for both cases: KPATHSEA_DEBUG=-1 mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mode_setup; end. Thanks for the quick reply. I've tried this and attached the (heavily snipped) output. The main thing I noticed is that it is

TeX-related things are very slow when I have lots of files

2007-04-13 Thread Joe Neeman
Hi all, I've been struggling with a problem for several days now -- I'm unable to run configure without first deleting all my out-www directories and I can't finish make web. Configure seems to hang forever on checking for working metafont mode... and make web hangs on bibtex. So I did some

Re: VerticalAxisGroup versus VerticalAlignment?

2007-04-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 02 April 2007 22:54, Trevor Bača wrote: Hi, How are VerticalAxisGroup and VerticalAlignment supposed to differ? Is one slated for deprecation? Not as far as I know. A VerticalAxisGroup is just a way to group together lots of grobs which are then aligned vertically (by the

Re: Vertical spacing documentation

2007-03-29 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 07:39, Graham Percival wrote: Joe Neeman wrote: Here is an update to the documentation on vertical spacing. I've removed the section on two-pass spacing and replaced it with a couple of paragraphs on how to tweak the one-pass spacing (it's rather less complicated

Re: valgrind barfs

2007-03-18 Thread Joe Neeman
On Monday 19 March 2007 14:30, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Hi, running valgrind on the latest lilypond version with input/les-nereides.ly produces numerous warnings. This is with ubuntu 6.06 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==26981==at 0x81F37DD:

Vertical spacing documentation

2007-03-18 Thread Joe Neeman
Here is an update to the documentation on vertical spacing. I've removed the section on two-pass spacing and replaced it with a couple of paragraphs on how to tweak the one-pass spacing (it's rather less complicated than the 2-pass stuff, so I think it doesn't need it own section). diff --git

progress with gub

2007-03-06 Thread Joe Neeman
I have an x86 chroot now and gub completes make -f lilypond.make bootstrap. But if I try make -f lilypond.make all, I get: executing pipe git --git-dir /home/joe/lilypond/downloads/lilypond.git log --max-count=1 --pretty=oneline -git.sv.gnu.org-lilypond.git fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD'

Re: lilypond web site

2007-03-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:26, Graham Percival wrote: Ian Stirling wrote: I clicked on the W3C icon at the bottom of the home page and was shown ten errors by the Markup Validation Service. Thanks for the warning. The errors seem to be in the News items, but I don't know enough about

gub fails on odcctools

2007-03-01 Thread Joe Neeman
make -f lilypond.make bootstrap fails on odcctools. I've stuck the full output at the bottom of this email just in case it has something I've missed, but the basic problem is that (struct ranlib).ran_un doesn't have an element ran_name. I've traced this to the definition of struct ranlib in

Re: gub fails on odcctools

2007-03-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Friday 02 March 2007 10:05, Joe Neeman wrote: make -f lilypond.make bootstrap fails on odcctools. I've stuck the full output at the bottom of this email just in case it has something I've missed, but the basic problem is that (struct ranlib).ran_un doesn't have an element ran_name. Sorry

GUB fails on make bootstrap

2007-02-27 Thread Joe Neeman
Checking out the gub branch from git and running make bootstrap gives me the following error: module-name: lib/linux.py downloading http://lilypond.org/download/gub-sources/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_i386.deb ... downloading

Re: severe layout bug

2007-02-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 24 February 2007 19:28, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Thanks, fixed in git. It's better, though, if you send these to the bug list. OK. BTW, are you getting reports of items which I directly enter into the bug data base? I get the emails that the bug tracker sends if that's what you

Re: another severe layout bug

2007-02-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 24 February 2007 19:31, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Here is a very simple counterexample: lilypond fails with `Can't fit systems on page -- ignoring between-system-padding' warnings for no good reason, messing up the output. This is a very serious bug. Thanks, fixed in git.

Re: severe layout bug

2007-02-23 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 16:23, Werner LEMBERG wrote: [This is git 52c3eafc2f58157f678fca96328920a832c430eb, 2007-02-19 16:14:13] \version 2.11.19 \header { texidoc = The new vertical layout algorithm must obey @code{minimum-Y-extent} of the @code{VerticalAxisGroup}. Here is a

Re: another severe layout bug

2007-02-23 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 16:35, Werner LEMBERG wrote: [This is git 52c3eafc2f58157f678fca96328920a832c430eb, 2007-02-19 16:14:13] In my opinion, this and the other bug I've just reported should have highest priority! lilypond is nearly unusable currently. Werner

Re: Latest GIT version broken?

2007-01-31 Thread Joe Neeman
On 1/31/07, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Am I the only one who can't use the latest GIT version? As soon as I try to compile a .ly file, I get a GUILE error: In lily/text-interface.cc, change line 29 from LY_ASSERT_TYPE (scm_is_string, props, 3); to LY_ASSERT_TYPE

Re: Controlling vertical spacing exactly - mini HOWTO

2007-01-31 Thread Joe Neeman
Hi Graham Max (and everyone), I've been reading through chapter 11 on vertical spacing and getting some vertical spacing examples ready for the manual. And on reflection I think I've now figured out why it's been tricky for me to get a good conceptual handle on vertical spacing. So I'd like to

Re: skyline vs. y-aligned-side

2007-01-27 Thread Joe Neeman
On 1/27/07, Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Sorry, I missed that question. The easiest solution is: git commit --amend This command allows you to edit the command message. If you forgot a file, you can add it with: git commit --amend file NOTE NOTE NOTE! You

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >