Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: Here's a new patch that you can use instead of the previous one. (Since you've reverted it.) Please let me know how that works! Jan, where are we on this? - do you want to officially git revert Valentin's previous

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
reverting is OK since the patch is wrong ad Valentin asks for it, right? Let me think about that. What I would like is for Valentin to fix it the way he thinks it's best. Eg: two patches, one simple git revert --no-edit and the new patch. I don't like reverting other people's patches. Graham

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-07 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote: Let me think about that.  What I would like is for Valentin to fix it the way he thinks it's best.  Eg: two patches, one simple git revert --no-edit and the new patch.  I don't like reverting other people's patches. I

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I only posted an amended patch because Graham said he had reverted my first patch. Here's a patch against master. Applied, pushed, thanks! Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl

2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-04 Thread Graham Percival
Since GUB master still cannot build lilypond due to that target_cpu error, I've reverted my local tree back to 2a8f076a015ac06b37a7f86537cf47691e65e745 which is the commit we used for 2.13.40. Carl, Neil, and Valentin have made great progress on the volleyball regression bugs. I'm going to

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Since GUB master still cannot build lilypond due to that target_cpu error, I've reverted my local tree back to    2a8f076a015ac06b37a7f86537cf47691e65e745 which is the commit we used for 2.13.40. Here's a new

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Since GUB master still cannot build lilypond due to that target_cpu error, I've reverted my local tree back to    

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Since GUB master still cannot build lilypond due to that target_cpu error, I've

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

2010-12-04 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 12/4/10 1:32 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Since GUB master still cannot build lilypond due to that