Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 24.02.2016 00:08, Dan Eble wrote:
>> Is this a case where attaching an arpeggio to a chord with ^ or _
>> should make a difference, or do I misunderstand the point of those
>> characters?
>
> Yes, you do. They change the direction of the entire
Hi Simon,
Am 24.02.2016 um 21:50 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 23.02.2016 22:22, Noeck wrote:
>> the names \arpeggioUp and \arpeggioDown are still free and
>> would me much more lilypondish.
>
> More imprecise, really. It’s really only the direction of the arrow
> that’s changed, not the
Hi Simon,
> Surely it is a question of priorities. Do such alternating patterns occur
> more often than situations with arpeggio direction changing once in a while,
> but each change holds for several subsequent chords? That’s the question. (I
> cannot answer.)
I think my solution addresses
On 23.02.2016 22:22, Noeck wrote:
the names \arpeggioUp and \arpeggioDown are still free and
would me much more lilypondish.
More imprecise, really. It’s really only the direction of the arrow
that’s changed, not the direction of the whole grob.
Best, Simon
On 24.02.2016 00:08, Dan Eble wrote:
Is this a case where attaching an arpeggio to a chord with ^ or _ should make a
difference, or do I misunderstand the point of those characters?
Yes, you do. They change the direction of the entire grob, not the
arpeggio-direction indicated by the arrow.
On 23.02.2016 16:14, Abraham Lee wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Malte Meyn > wrote:
Am 23.02.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros:
I'm trying to write a function to make easier for me to change
arrow
Am 24.02.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Dan Eble:
> Is this a case where attaching an arpeggio to a chord with ^ or _ should make
> a difference, or do I misunderstand the point of those characters?
That was also discussed in the old thread. Not conclusive but with more
insights than I have:
On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:22 , Noeck wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion
>> before, but it didn't result in any core changes.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html
>
>> Dev Team,
>>
>>
Hi,
> I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion
> before, but it didn't result in any core changes.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html
> Dev Team,
>
> Any reason \arpeggioArrowUp and \arpeggioArrowDown can't be defined this
> way
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.02.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros:
>
>> I'm trying to write a function to make easier for me to change arrow
>> directions in arpeggios.
>>
>
> I would prefer an event function with a tweak:
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo