On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
There are two critical issues that we're going to have to start
seriously thinking about now if 2.18 is going to happen anytime soon:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2733
I'm not comfortable marking this critical
There are two critical issues that we're going to have to start seriously
thinking about now if 2.18 is going to happen anytime soon:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2733
I'm not comfortable marking this critical: not because it is not critical for
Laura, nor because it may
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for a long time, in which it may be
worth pushing the translate_axis
On 27 mars 2013, at 07:54, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:04:39PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can
build it, Graham, if you're over hours.
It's already building.
Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can build
it, Graham, if you're over hours.
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:04:39PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can
build it, Graham, if you're over hours.
It's already building. I've been trying to build it for the past
few days, but I can only do it after booting
Thanks for all answers.
On 8 January 2012 23:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 8 stycznia 2012 10:11 użytkownik James pkx1...@gmail.com napisał:
Start by looking here:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
According to our motto the aim of LilyPond is music engraving to
everyone - i'd say it's a very good goal. It would mean that a
person with average computer skills (like navigating a web browser and
using word processor) should be able to create
Hello,
2012/1/8 Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com:
What's the aim of Lilypond?
err..
LilyPond is a music engraving program, devoted to producing the
highest-quality sheet music possible. It brings the aesthetics of
traditionally engraved music to computer printouts.
And why isn't it
On Jan 8, 2012, at 2:54 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
Are there some guidelines how to write new code to work in the same
manner as the already written code?
We have a contributor's guide. It is not complete, but that's
W dniu 8 stycznia 2012 02:54 użytkownik Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca napisał:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
* Let's assume that I would like to help in developing Lilypond, but
I don't have my own idea, what part of it I could
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
As for all the emails that were written it the last two days, I believe
that a sort of coordination is needed in each project.
We have the amount of coordination that we have chosen.
* Let's assume that I would like
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\layout {
\layout-from { \compressFullBarRests
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'common-shortest-duration =
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
What i want to say is, i'm afraid you might have forgotten how it
feels to be a non-programmer. It's not a joke that for average person
that wants to produce some notation, it's hard enough to use text
input.
In the light of the focus of the
David,
2012/1/7 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I really don't quite get the point of complaining that I provide
alternative ways of accessing functionality. Nobody forces you to make
use of them.
2012/1/7 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
In the light of the focus of the work I have been doing for
First of all I would like to apologize for misjudging Lilypond project.
As for all the emails that were written it the last two days, I believe
that a sort of coordination is needed in each project. Maybe for some of
them there must be one boss with many programmers and designers, while for
other
2012/1/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\layout {
\layout-from { \compressFullBarRests
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'common-shortest-duration =
#(ly:make-moment 6 10)
}
etc...
}
ok...
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction in which we are going.
I'm sure that other people have their pet projects as well. The
ensemble of these
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:14 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction in which we are going.
I'm sure that other people
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:14 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\with \settingsFrom { \compressFullBarRests }
}
\context {
\Staff
\with \settingsFrom { \accidentalStyle modern }
}
}
}
\end{lilypond}
\ph is a music function written in
On 3 January 2012 21:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a TeX specialist, system programmer, Emacs specialist, the GNU
maintainer (and a rather pitiful one) for AUCTeX (lytex and itexi
anybody? preview-latex for Lilypond?)
Mmm... Preview for Lilypond? Sounds like a
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
On 3 January 2012 21:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a TeX specialist, system programmer, Emacs specialist, the GNU
maintainer (and a rather pitiful one) for AUCTeX (lytex and itexi
anybody? preview-latex for
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\with \settingsFrom { \compressFullBarRests }
}
\context {
\Staff
\with \settingsFrom { \accidentalStyle modern }
}
}
}
\end{lilypond}
2012/1/4 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
hello,
On 3 Jan 2012, at 22:26, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I might have given you a wrong impression, i don't think its really
that bad. There is some teamwork, but no leader indeed.
to use an English expression ... poppycock!
Janek
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\settingsFrom is actually returning a Scheme expression for \with to
use. It makes things rather simpler than more complex, even though it
constitutes a Scheme expression.
Um... i would really love to be able to type
\layout {
Adding Luke to recipients again... (please remember to include him as
he's not signed to our mailing lists),
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
Regarding all those fragments of Janek's and David's emails: For some time
I have been observing how
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\settingsFrom is actually returning a Scheme expression for \with to
use. It makes things rather simpler than more complex, even though it
constitutes a Scheme expression.
Um... i would really love to be
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction in which we are going.
I think that it is very difficult to set these goals because different things
interest different people. I know that Bertrand and I
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:03:08AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
There is a _reason_ the remaining OSX and Windows based developers
are doing (definitely important) documentation and web site work.
They are to a large degree locked out and dependent on
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
There is a _reason_
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
No. I have an Ubuntu VM which I use for quick experiments and a very
fast Ubuntu PC which I use for full builds. But I support lilypond
because I _use_ it for typesetting music on a _Windows_
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David. Given that we develop within a GNU environment, bugs
specific to
On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David. Given that we
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David.
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David. Given that we develop within a
Hello,
On 3 January 2012 12:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
One in-the-middle approach is to check out package managers that are
offering LilyPond releases. I know, for example, that brew offers a
version of LilyPond on Mac OS X. If we provide a list of package
managers and how-tos for the
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On 3 January 2012 12:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will
2012/1/3 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
It so happens that none of these Critical issues are really
fixable by reverting a single commit.
[...]
ok, thanks for this explanation!
Is finding them an easy (no knowledge
needed, a complete set of dumbed-down instructions can be given
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
The Learning Guide and the Notation Guide need a complete rereading and
reorganization, and it is not like the Extending Guide is in
significantly better shape.
I'd like to fix them too, but i don't have
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
The Learning Guide and the Notation Guide need a complete rereading and
reorganization, and it is not like the Extending Guide is in
significantly better shape.
I'd like
good progress on
the GUB-related critical issues.
URL:http://xkcd.com/386/
yep.
Let's cut to the chase: I am an evil semi-overlord. I jealously
guard my ssh login to lilypond.org (along with Han-Wen's and
Jan's), I am fickle, and I like to play with small kittens. Due
to my evil fickle nature, I
after dev release vs
stable?
Yeah, especially since Carl was *already* making good progress on
the GUB-related critical issues.
URL:http://xkcd.com/386/
yep.
Let's cut to the chase: I am an evil semi-overlord. I jealously
guard my ssh login to lilypond.org (along with Han-Wen's and
Jan's
?
Yeah, especially since Carl was *already* making good progress on
the GUB-related critical issues.
URL:http://xkcd.com/386/
yep.
Let's cut to the chase: I am an evil semi-overlord. I jealously
guard my ssh login to lilypond.org (along with Han-Wen's and
Jan's), I am fickle, and I like
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
LilyPond needs to get into a state where, say, half the
engravers are written and maintained in Scheme. And by Scheme I don't
mean Scheme at the level Nicolas can barely handle but Scheme a
Fortran
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
LilyPond needs to get into a state where, say, half the
engravers are written and maintained in Scheme. And by Scheme I don't
mean Scheme at the level Nicolas can barely
Hi Luke,
nice to see you joining the discussion :)
W dniu 3 stycznia 2012 23:06 użytkownik Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com napisał:
That's like + from me!
In general, i agree that we should think in a more 'release-oriented'
way (last stable release was half a year ago, so we
hello,
On 3 Jan 2012, at 22:26, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luke,
nice to see you joining the discussion :)
W dniu 3 stycznia 2012 23:06 użytkownik Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com napisał:
That's like + from me!
In general, i agree that we should think
I see the following critical issues:
2160document LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT
2100Patch: CG: explanation of branches for the impatient
1948Windows install clobbered system PATH
1943lilypond after 2.15.8 fails on x86 Macs
1933Lilypond-book requires msvcrt again
1933, 1943, 1948
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:59:47PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I see the following critical issues:
-snip-
There is, actually, a wagonload of other changes underfoot that does not
appear quite compatible with releasing a version called stable to me.
It seems strange to me that the _above_
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:59:47PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I see the following critical issues:
-snip-
There is, actually, a wagonload of other changes underfoot that does not
appear quite compatible with releasing a version called
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
This was the result of between 25 to 40 emails in August 2011 on
lilypond-devel. A quick scan didn't reveal your name amongst
those emails, but we simply cannot afford to
should attack these critical issues at all
costs, let me know and i'll consider it.
We could certainly consider dropping support for OSX or windows.
That would eliminate 80% (or more!) of our user base, including
everybody who works on our documentation, plus certain extremely
valuable developer
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
This was the result of between 25 to 40 emails in August 2011 on
lilypond-devel. A quick scan didn't reveal your name amongst
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:03:08AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
We could certainly consider dropping support for OSX or windows.
That sort of token solidarity is actually counterproductive:
if you believe that non-releases lead to non-users,
possible to say i think
that we shouldn't make a stable release despite having 0 critical
issues, because current master is shabby and we have some major
changes going in the codebase.
I think that the problem may be that we don't organize our work (and
don't want to according to GOP7
http://lilypond.org
(sorry for double-post)
2012/1/2 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
If you are aware of any other issues which fall under the
definition (i.e. a reproducible failure to
currently open
critical regression, does it mean that's impossible to tell or simply
noone tried to find them?
It so happens that none of these Critical issues are really
fixable by reverting a single commit.
- lilypond-book came from a general rewrite of lilypond-book.
- osx came from me
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:03:08AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
We could certainly consider dropping support for OSX or windows.
That sort of token solidarity is actually counterproductive:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is
to revert the flawed fix.
Reason: we get rid of a critical issue.
The original
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is
to revert the
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:42 AM
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few
hours) is
to revert the flawed fix.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:04:59AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
But this bug has been reported as occuring non-deterministically even in
successive runs on the same machine, and there are rather few things
that can introduce such stochastic behavior (another possibility would
be timer-triggered
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:04:59AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
But this bug has been reported as occuring non-deterministically even in
successive runs on the same machine, and there are rather few things
that can introduce such stochastic
2011/7/31 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 07:45:20 schrieb Graham Percival:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1732
This is unfortunate, since it means that we can't have a release
candidate on Aug 01.
Without a reproducible test case, it's simply not possible
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:26:11AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Modern operating systems don't give your code any leftovers from a
previous run. That would be a security violation.
I'm certain that I've seen an uninitialized variable being
123456789 in some cases, and 0 in others. I sincerly
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:26:11AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Modern operating systems don't give your code any leftovers from a
previous run. That would be a security violation.
I'm certain that I've seen an uninitialized variable being
On 31/07/11 17:47, David Kastrup wrote:
Windows 2000 (not NT-based IIRC) does not usefully employ memory
protection IIRC, so likely Cygwin does not add all too much on top.
Windows 2000 most definitely IS NT-based. You're thinking of Windows ME,
which is the last of the DOS7/Win9x line.
Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk writes:
On 31/07/11 17:47, David Kastrup wrote:
Windows 2000 (not NT-based IIRC) does not usefully employ memory
protection IIRC, so likely Cygwin does not add all too much on top.
Windows 2000 most definitely IS NT-based. You're thinking of Windows ME,
that they would like to have stable releases
more regularly. Some people have expressed a willingness to work
on a team, i.e. spending a few hours a week on stuff that
(potentially) doesn't interest them in the least, simply to keep
momentum.
I implore those people to investigate + fix Critical issues. I
know
Hey guys,
I've been busy/distracted/sick for the past week, and I'll
continue to be busy/distracted/sick for the next ten days. I'm
also fed up with announcing a release candidate and then
discovering that there's a known critical issue that wasn't on the
tracker a day later.
1) if you're
is
the problem?
Well on one hand, none of today's Critical Issues in Lilypond,
are on the list of priorities for our project. So even if we had
20 full-time developers, it wouldn't help with releasing the next
stable version.
On the other hand, we have implemented some major new
functionality
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:29:11AM -0500, Boris Shingarov wrote:
The Lilypond project has a very specific set of objectives. There
is a defined set of procedures, a roadmap, a set of criteria of
what is acceptable to go into the codebase, etc.
This is true of any (well-organized) project.
%{ Fellow Contributors,
The patches look like they do the job, and give clean regression tests,
but the developers are hesitant. I am not a programmer, and I cannot
read minds, but I can tell you what makes *me* hesitant.
Look at issue 1120. A lyric syllable covering more than one note spread
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:33:10 -0800, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
... because that fixes 1120 more
solidly and removes the cause for issues 1474 and 1472,
Well, reverting ee0488 removes the cause of our /noticing/ issue 1472
(multi-measure rests colliding with key signatures).
The
Pushed to Rietveld:http://codereview.appspot.com/4056043
Note that there is a trailing whitespace error on line 47 of the diff.
Cheers,
MS
On Jan 20, 2011, at 5:13 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:33:10 -0800, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
... because that fixes 1120
I'll take care of 1472, but I need a copy of Valentin's opera.
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Work on Critical issues has pretty much wound down. Carl asked
about the status of 1474 recently; I'd like to take that a step
further and ask for a dedicated volunteer to act as shepherd for
each issue.
- you *don't* need to program, or even understand programming
(but that would
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Did you know that English is an absolutely stupid language? The
word biweekly can mean either 4 times each 14 days, or 1 time
each 14 days!
What's wrong with fortnightly?
--
David Kastrup
___
I'll take on 1474
Bernard
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:27AM -0500, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'll take care of 1472, but I need a copy of Valentin's opera.
Valentin's opera is available as a git checkout:
http://repo.or.cz/w/opera_libre.git
but did you mean 1475 instead? Benk has claimed it.
I tried briefly
I'll take care of 1472, but I need a copy of Valentin's opera.
Valentin's opera is available as a git checkout:
http://repo.or.cz/w/opera_libre.git
but did you mean 1475 instead? Benk has claimed it.
I tried briefly looking at the opera a few days ago, but it didn't
compile in 2.12.3 or
On 1/19/11, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
I tried briefly looking at the opera a few days ago, but it didn't
compile in 2.12.3 or 2.13.46, so I gave up after a few minutes.
Finding a minimal example that works in both 2.12.3 and 2.13.46
might be tricky,
tonight I'll prepare a smaller
2011/1/19 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On 1/19/11, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
I tried briefly looking at the opera a few days ago, but it didn't
compile in 2.12.3 or 2.13.46, so I gave up after a few minutes.
Finding a minimal example that works in both 2.12.3 and
2011/1/19 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
it's no problem for me to recompile lilypond
30 or 40 times.
Finding a commit out of 40 by git-bisect shouldn't need to recompile
more than log2(40)=5.32 , this gives 6 times in the worst case.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:32:21PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/1/19 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
it's no problem for me to recompile lilypond
30 or 40 times.
Finding a commit out of 40 by git-bisect shouldn't need to recompile
more than log2(40)=5.32 , this gives 6
Graham et all,
I have read all of the postings and am up to date - I meant what next as a
general question to the community in the sense of would anyone who was
actually involved in the pushing of this commit (Joe - I see your name
associated with it - how much work did you do on it?) like to
On 1/19/11 2:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Graham et all,
I have read all of the postings and am up to date - I meant what next as a
general question to the community in the sense of would anyone who was
actually involved in the pushing of this commit (Joe - I
On 1/19/11 2:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Graham et all,
I have read all of the postings and am up to date - I meant what next as a
general question to the community in the sense of would anyone who was
actually involved in the pushing of this commit (Joe - I
Got it.
Then, here is the state of things:
1/6
Bug is first reported on the bug list.
1/7
Neil reports adding a default 'extra-spacing-height to key signature.
1/10
Keith confirms that this works and that he gets a clean make check.
1/13
Phil holmes reports the regression on the bugtracker
On 1/19/11 4:33 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Got it.
Then, here is the state of things:
1/6
Bug is first reported on the bug list.
1/7
Neil reports adding a default 'extra-spacing-height to key signature.
1/10
Keith confirms that this works and that he gets a clean
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
